TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 LA Tech  20-12 (0.625)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.639 (132nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.492 (139th)
Record Quality: 0.123 (112th)
Avg. Season Rank: 127.33 (122nd)
Pace: 64.48 (311th)
Momentum: 2.54 (68th)
Off. Momentum: 0.14 (190th)
Def. Momentum: 2.39 (41st)
Consistency: -10.65 (315th)
Res. Consistency: -14.75 (304th)
Away From Home: 0.39 (102nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.13 (190th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.61 26.42 74.80 84.31 45.80 33.09 35.12 15.41 41.15 35.81 57.67 11.22 13.82 7.72 39.24 18.28 42.48 1.97
RANK: 158th 206th 92nd 313th 90th 199th 113th 327th 47th 49th 208th 235th 217th 41st 165th 322nd 24th 85th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.52 27.24 -- 89.94 41.87 35.46 30.96 19.40 35.67 35.08 56.32 14.26 15.01 6.04 39.42 21.57 39.01 2.00
RANK: 115th 179th -- 299th 86th 268th 32nd 90th 107th 313th 90th 316th 212th 184th 220th 57th 280th 219th

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, LA Tech is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Haslametrics has them ranked 132nd overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 20-12. Of the 10 schools in Conference USA (average ranking 144.2), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, LA Tech will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 106 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #115 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. LA Tech has done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 32nd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.0% of their attempts from afar.

LA Tech plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 158th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 109 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. LA Tech will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is 24th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 57.7% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. LA Tech is also one of the better teams in the country when it comes to converting scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 7.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 41st nationally). If LA Tech does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's penchant for allowing too many easy buckets off of giveaways. The squad has a rating of 14.26 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of steals, which ranks 49th-worst in the college game.

LA Tech has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 315th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
LA Tech is typically better vs. teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.98%, LA Tech performs above their norm 82% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 33% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, LA Tech often performs better than normal. LA Tech is more efficient than usual 91% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 13.62. In their other contests, LA Tech performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
LA Tech does worse vs. clubs that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.02, LA Tech performs above average 40% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 86% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25132nd132nd97th112thConference USA311th315th139th190th102nd122nd
2023-24100th100th47th105thConference USA253rd108th195th256th51st93rd
2022-23177th176th230th192ndConference USA207th117th109th119th95th163rd
2021-2298th98th51st82ndConference USA97th152nd156th297th257th91st
2020-2172nd72nd25th46thConference USA119th116th136th193rd276th104th
2019-2069th69th38th71stConference USA263rd287th196th204th162nd58th
2018-19151st151st101st131stConference USA273rd107th204th2nd256th145th
2017-18146th146th173rd175thConference USA217th126th141st164th163rd154th
2016-1792nd92nd54th105thConference USA152nd91st291st298th297th75th
2015-16173rd172nd57th112thConference USA35th43rd261st131st325th145th
2014-1580th80th21st55thConference USA32nd16th172nd133rd292nd89th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25158th206th92nd313th90th199th113th327th47th49th208th235th217th41st165th322nd24th85th
2023-24125th19th260th182nd179th260th147th235th283rd41st231st215th14th22nd268th232nd44th45th
2022-23165th261st167th133rd181st110th181st332nd126th31st269th94th190th122nd118th336th29th114th
2021-22120th149th107th135th156th107th240th291st110th80th156th93rd104th45th115th297th93rd179th
2020-21114th67th253rd126th114th237th224th264th290th20th113th127th119th88th255th271st19th37th
2019-2088th266th287th102nd57th128th32nd304th295th25th122nd84th184th104th145th316th37th98th
2018-19183rd77th336th105th218th154th216th163rd203rd156th212th177th65th94th176th171st172nd184th
2017-18149th118th225th159th195th129th106th294th202nd54th299th203rd180th259th129th301st62nd128th
2016-1793rd173rd142nd116th106th163rd94th211th211th82nd121st80th110th132nd175th222nd101st146th
2015-16192nd125th305th233rd165th215th266th306th327th24th151st58th183rd179th205th307th17th47th
2014-1596th282nd221st29th110th119th232nd117th116th144th57th6th57th22nd175th153rd209th196th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25115th179th--299th86th268th32nd90th107th313th90th316th212th184th220th57th280th219th
2023-2476th193rd--149th48th204th215th158th19th178th19th252nd150th51st211th165th191st170th
2022-23181st306th--17th249th245th336th17th131st77th225th185th100th109th321st38th159th73rd
2021-2266th164th--92nd57th234th105th168th66th70th88th94th228th193rd254th192nd91st77th
2020-2147th120th--71st55th294th98th70th90th78th83rd65th69th36th326th84th100th43rd
2019-2077th159th--100th71st273rd55th32nd310th183rd26th12th215th73rd308th31st207th121st
2018-19130th165th--122nd163rd186th130th185th231st117th189th38th292nd122nd201st203rd138th146th
2017-18161st171st--138th163rd105th264th90th247th287th41st134th126th49th111th99th294th293rd
2016-17107th23rd--222nd145th208th293rd276th132nd96th126th184th131st108th183rd268th82nd102nd
2015-16150th81st--147th216th146th153rd67th240th289th152nd10th137th181st162nd57th297th270th
2014-1573rd56th--170th151st27th167th288th203rd243rd81st62nd206th218th19th299th247th305th