TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 LA Tech  15-18 (0.455)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.517 (177th)
Schedule Strength: 0.542 (109th)
Record Quality: -0.036 (192nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 165.32 (163rd)
Pace: 67.30 (207th)
Momentum: -2.71 (293rd)
Off. Momentum: -1.98 (324th)
Def. Momentum: -0.72 (180th)
Consistency: -8.70 (117th)
Res. Consistency: -8.75 (15th)
Away From Home: 0.15 (95th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.15 (119th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.97 23.49 72.04 85.59 43.71 33.09 33.93 18.40 38.81 34.10 55.84 12.19 13.96 5.67 38.66 21.49 39.84 1.99
RANK: 165th 261st 167th 133rd 181st 110th 181st 332nd 126th 31st 269th 94th 190th 122nd 118th 336th 29th 114th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.27 28.38 -- 79.16 45.20 32.56 37.49 19.31 36.82 27.29 60.33 10.73 12.99 4.81 41.13 24.39 34.48 2.07
RANK: 181st 306th -- 17th 249th 245th 336th 17th 131st 77th 225th 185th 100th 109th 321st 38th 159th 73rd

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, LA Tech should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Their record this season is 15-18, and the club is ranked 177th overall (out of 363) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 11) in Conference USA (average ranking 138.0).

If there is a strength for LA Tech this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 165th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. LA Tech will make a strong effort to get off as many field goals close to the basket as they can. The ball-club is 29th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. Curiously enough, though they shoot a fair amount of field goals from the inside, they don't really make a whole bunch of them, converting only 55.8% of their near-proximity attempts vs. AO.

LA Tech plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 181st nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. LA Tech has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 17th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 79.16 vs. AO. If LA Tech does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's inability to stop opponents from sinking threes. AO will convert 37.5% of their three-point attempts, and the team ranks 28th-worst in that category because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
LA Tech is typically better vs. teams that are typically efficient on offense. Against foes that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 106.52, LA Tech performs above their norm 80% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 35% of the time.
When facing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, LA Tech often performs better than normal. LA Tech is more efficient than usual 71% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 84.68. In their other contests, LA Tech performs better than the norm 31% of the time.
LA Tech does worse vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.81, LA Tech performs above average 38% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25132nd132nd97th113thConference USA311th317th139th189th101st122nd
2023-24100th100th47th105thConference USA253rd108th195th256th51st93rd
2022-23177th176th230th192ndConference USA207th117th109th119th95th163rd
2021-2298th98th51st82ndConference USA97th152nd156th297th257th91st
2020-2172nd72nd25th46thConference USA119th116th136th193rd276th104th
2019-2069th69th38th71stConference USA263rd287th196th204th162nd58th
2018-19151st151st101st131stConference USA273rd107th204th2nd256th145th
2017-18146th146th173rd175thConference USA217th126th141st164th163rd154th
2016-1792nd92nd54th105thConference USA152nd91st291st298th297th75th
2015-16173rd172nd57th112thConference USA35th43rd261st131st325th145th
2014-1580th80th21st55thConference USA32nd16th172nd133rd292nd89th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25158th204th92nd311th89th201st112th327th49th50th208th235th216th42nd166th323rd23rd84th
2023-24125th19th260th182nd179th260th147th235th283rd41st231st215th14th22nd268th232nd44th45th
2022-23165th261st167th133rd181st110th181st332nd126th31st269th94th190th122nd118th336th29th114th
2021-22120th149th107th135th156th107th240th291st110th80th156th93rd104th45th115th297th93rd179th
2020-21114th67th253rd126th114th237th224th264th290th20th113th127th119th88th255th271st19th37th
2019-2088th266th287th102nd57th128th32nd304th295th25th122nd84th184th104th145th316th37th98th
2018-19183rd77th336th105th218th154th216th163rd203rd156th212th177th65th94th176th171st172nd184th
2017-18149th118th225th159th195th129th106th294th202nd54th299th203rd180th259th129th301st62nd128th
2016-1793rd173rd142nd116th106th163rd94th211th211th82nd121st80th110th132nd175th222nd101st146th
2015-16192nd125th305th233rd165th215th266th306th327th24th151st58th183rd179th205th307th17th47th
2014-1596th282nd221st29th110th119th232nd117th116th144th57th6th57th22nd175th153rd209th196th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25114th179th--299th87th267th33rd90th109th314th89th317th212th183rd220th57th278th219th
2023-2476th193rd--149th48th204th215th158th19th178th19th252nd150th51st211th165th191st170th
2022-23181st306th--17th249th245th336th17th131st77th225th185th100th109th321st38th159th73rd
2021-2266th164th--92nd57th234th105th168th66th70th88th94th228th193rd254th192nd91st77th
2020-2147th120th--71st55th294th98th70th90th78th83rd65th69th36th326th84th100th43rd
2019-2077th159th--100th71st273rd55th32nd310th183rd26th12th215th73rd308th31st207th121st
2018-19130th165th--122nd163rd186th130th185th231st117th189th38th292nd122nd201st203rd138th146th
2017-18161st171st--138th163rd105th264th90th247th287th41st134th126th49th111th99th294th293rd
2016-17107th23rd--222nd145th208th293rd276th132nd96th126th184th131st108th183rd268th82nd102nd
2015-16150th81st--147th216th146th153rd67th240th289th152nd10th137th181st162nd57th297th270th
2014-1573rd56th--170th151st27th167th288th203rd243rd81st62nd206th218th19th299th247th305th