TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Arizona  27-8 (0.771)  |  Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.926 (28th)
Schedule Strength: 0.674 (62nd)
Record Quality: 0.435 (15th)
Avg. Season Rank: 26.20 (24th)
Pace: 68.57 (272nd)
Momentum: -2.17 (277th)
Off. Momentum: -2.13 (314th)
Def. Momentum: -0.04 (141st)
Consistency: -9.39 (220th)
Res. Consistency: -11.70 (173rd)
Away From Home: -0.83 (216th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.76 (308th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.35 29.39 76.51 81.07 51.34 26.29 36.57 26.99 44.77 27.78 71.71 8.72 15.68 10.23 32.43 33.30 34.27 1.98
RANK: 13th 43rd 33rd 212th 2nd 303rd 99th 59th 3rd 203rd 1st 289th 119th 12th 306th 51st 193rd 98th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.61 21.90 -- 85.11 42.12 30.52 34.48 28.65 34.00 25.94 60.10 11.15 13.44 6.91 35.86 33.66 30.48 2.05
RANK: 96th 34th -- 298th 76th 172nd 115th 332nd 43rd 78th 171st 201st 90th 184th 115th 326th 54th 115th

ANALYSIS:
Arizona is one of the teams in the upper echelon of college basketball this year. They are ranked #28 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 27-8. Of the 12 schools in the Pac-12 (average ranking 95.3), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Arizona is undoubtedly one of the best in the business on offense. The team is rated 13th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 115 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Arizona is a very dangerous team when it comes to shooting the rock, ranking in the top-25 in three of our four major field goal categories. They are most proficient from two-point range, making good on 44.8% of their mid-range jumpers (third in the nation), 71.7% of their near-proximity chances (first), and 51.3% of their total shots from the field (second) vs. AO. Arizona also does an outstanding job finishing any scoring chances they obtain from offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 10.2% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 12th nationally).

Arizona is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 96th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 99 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Arizona does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.90 vs. AO, they are currently rated 34th in the country in that category. Arizona has also been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 43rd in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 34.0% of their attempts from that distance. To capitalize on that weakness, this team will make AO shoot from mid-range locations more than they usually would. Of AO's total field goals, a large portion of them (33.7%) will be from mid-range.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Arizona often performs worse than normal. Arizona is more efficient than usual 10% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.61%. In their other contests, Arizona performs better than the norm 56% of the time.
Arizona does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.16%, Arizona performs above average 29% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
Arizona performs better against squads that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.25%, Arizona is more efficient than normal 73% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 29% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2513th13th80th29thBig 1242nd217th7th350th214th11th
2023-247th7th25th5thPac-1219th228th13th207th350th3rd
2022-238th8th12th12thPac-1220th206th41st68th106th10th
2021-227th7th2nd2ndPac-1222nd141st74th196th185th7th
2020-2116th16th79th34thPac-12197th265th53rd98th120th30th
2019-2015th15th72nd33rdPac-12141st276th42nd309th337th10th
2018-1994th94th153rd100thPac-12206th198th68th243rd264th62nd
2017-1828th26th20th15thPac-12272nd220th62nd308th216th24th
2016-1724th24th3rd6thPac-12286th48th60th138th75th26th
2015-1619th19th42nd21stPac-12195th91st56th174th332nd20th
2014-154th4th6th6thPac-1288th114th37th52nd252nd12th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-259th17th22nd77th7th299th43rd156th60th28th16th61st77th16th320th174th50th29th
2023-2415th15th234th159th11th268th22nd307th147th6th47th28th16th7th280th313th6th17th
2022-2311th27th235th322nd2nd241st4th252nd67th162nd1st220th272nd56th195th225th114th132nd
2021-227th12th105th172nd4th236th18th296th221st13th6th91st58th25th239th302nd8th42nd
2020-2112th2nd70th110th37th305th10th64th181st114th53rd241st36th60th313th69th137th61st
2019-2034th12th84th106th70th245th100th37th129th266th26th54th95th156th269th42nd285th183rd
2018-19154th128th117th184th178th197th141st143rd318th195th97th217th193rd276th192nd146th191st182nd
2017-1813th43rd33rd212th2nd303rd99th59th3rd203rd1st289th119th12th306th51st193rd98th
2016-1721st9th35th209th18th292nd33rd86th23rd139th30th255th177th39th287th82nd135th70th
2015-1618th11th62nd218th14th289th20th132nd58th81st28th294th86th8th285th126th72nd50th
2014-157th1st33rd256th6th330th54th93rd6th117th16th96th40th9th325th69th79th36th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2533rd106th--158th21st190th107th323rd51st37th19th18th17th8th203rd331st35th74th
2023-247th12th--195th12th202nd22nd330th99th31st16th185th29th29th188th328th25th68th
2022-2330th13th--302nd19th315th34th342nd17th10th159th336th99th53rd281st329th3rd21st
2021-2218th43rd--314th11th192nd98th334th1st88th63rd201st152nd80th139th330th46th110th
2020-2153rd135th--176th44th221st66th276th124th67th38th75th256th136th233rd274th65th79th
2019-2014th150th--81st9th191st31st271st11th26th54th3rd32nd16th226th303rd31st49th
2018-1955th154th--74th106th126th47th293rd77th41st265th47th42nd124th168th317th46th105th
2017-1896th34th--298th76th172nd115th332nd43rd78th171st201st90th184th115th326th54th115th
2016-1733rd50th--255th34th247th15th225th57th149th83rd41st40th30th222nd202nd118th120th
2015-1634th4th--332nd41st118th29th344th66th132nd110th104th34th42nd61st329th72nd173rd
2014-153rd98th--14th10th67th74th295th27th13th8th4th2nd2nd130th340th33rd100th