TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 High Point  14-16 (0.467)  |  Big South
All-Play Percentage: 0.297 (247th)
Schedule Strength: 0.362 (303rd)
Record Quality: -0.210 (278th)
Avg. Season Rank: 218.21 (217th)
Pace: 68.31 (284th)
Momentum: -6.41 (345th)
Off. Momentum: -4.05 (345th)
Def. Momentum: -2.36 (283rd)
Consistency: -9.18 (197th)
Res. Consistency: -14.87 (331st)
Away From Home: -2.78 (339th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.34 (117th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.40 25.31 72.27 82.68 42.40 23.53 33.98 26.40 34.08 32.75 55.17 12.10 14.27 6.24 28.46 31.93 39.61 1.89
RANK: 261st 200th 152nd 141st 250th 336th 240th 71st 292nd 36th 295th 93rd 193rd 209th 339th 74th 43rd 10th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.89 30.23 -- 81.02 45.09 29.57 34.76 19.42 34.30 32.02 61.17 12.53 17.33 7.55 36.50 23.98 39.52 1.97
RANK: 232nd 311th -- 125th 193rd 125th 134th 54th 50th 295th 208th 298th 322nd 242nd 136th 54th 303rd 285th

ANALYSIS:
High Point has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. They have a record of 14-16 and are ranked 247th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 10) in the Big South (average ranking 237.2).

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to High Point. The team is ranked 261st in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 97 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. High Point isn't the greatest at protecting the ball on offense and, as a result, opponents tend to score more quick points off of steals than they normally would. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 12.53, which ranks 298th in D1.

High Point doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #232 in the nation in defensive efficiency. High Point can be weak on rebounding, giving the opposition too many chances to score off of the offensive glass. The club has a rating of 17.33 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (322nd nationally). High Point also commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 30.23 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #311 in the country in that category. If High Point does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to prevent opponents from draining shot attempts in between the three-point line and the low post. AO will convert just 34.3% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the team is nationally ranked 50th-best in that category as a result.

High Point has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked seventh from the bottom in positive momentum because of it. On the road, High Point performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 339th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
High Point is typically better vs. teams that do not defend well on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.20%, High Point performs above their norm 61% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 11% of the time.
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, High Point often performs worse than normal. High Point is more efficient than usual 18% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.33%. In their other contests, High Point performs better than the norm 63% of the time.
High Point does worse vs. clubs that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.02, High Point performs above average 29% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2589th89th9th62ndBig South219th170th289th133rd260th108th
2023-24111th110th25th92ndBig South95th7th271st43rd94th129th
2022-23306th306th237th258thBig South8th43rd304th61st347th266th
2021-22247th246th234th271stBig South191st261st236th148th224th253rd
2020-21288th288th261st280thBig South270th136th251st132nd216th280th
2019-20343rd343rd316th331stBig South248th247th281st272nd151st346th
2018-19235th235th165th206thBig South327th224th250th59th306th229th
2017-18247th247th211th278thBig South284th197th303rd117th339th217th
2016-17280th280th202nd258thBig South267th299th316th101st106th294th
2015-16161st161st78th155thBig South247th129th270th112th196th119th
2014-15150th150th48th114thBig South270th4th248th292nd79th148th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2551st94th65th110th68th140th69th82nd2nd310th164th233rd147th64th159th91st318th274th
2023-2452nd13th17th108th156th95th254th227th54th161st145th284th32nd107th104th236th185th233rd
2022-23291st84th354th274th269th158th307th317th203rd97th275th165th49th132nd124th311th69th140th
2021-22255th192nd327th218th199th253rd245th155th260th124th172nd130th120th38th244th156th108th95th
2020-21286th57th248th166th324th333rd299th23rd219th215th348th132nd125th173rd333rd20th216th73rd
2019-20334th94th203rd290th345th267th296th171st299th162nd347th290th62nd153rd247th143rd119th103rd
2018-19280th216th249th159th239th312th332nd124th37th65th314th299th109th238th315th124th70th45th
2017-18261st200th152nd141st250th336th240th71st292nd36th295th93rd193rd209th339th74th43rd10th
2016-17278th232nd29th242nd280th320th110th66th319th197th299th187th190th250th311th51st180th71st
2015-16105th176th20th92nd108th321st68th107th173rd19th212th46th62nd70th330th120th27th13th
2014-15139th265th24th166th121st262nd65th96th137th165th170th219th222nd78th268th88th167th107th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25167th195th--255th149th186th132nd348th294th41st175th38th248th181st160th348th28th85th
2023-24232nd305th--187th206th25th182nd331st274th191st151st83rd102nd58th25th329th188th303rd
2022-23258th297th--212th252nd211th151st14th160th354th209th314th355th315th195th9th349th297th
2021-22216th314th--114th242nd173rd64th3rd95th342nd294th232nd231st221st192nd2nd348th306th
2020-21268th257th--125th248th314th267th23rd247th169th223rd191st30th127th329th25th190th77th
2019-20335th294th--141st327th328th349th13th343rd168th216th341st309th255th335th12th180th68th
2018-19176th166th--283rd112th345th36th63rd117th131st231st168th230th251st336th46th107th35th
2017-18232nd311th--125th193rd125th134th54th50th295th208th298th322nd242nd136th54th303rd285th
2016-17257th161st--200th260th286th265th91st337th186th183rd259th243rd321st286th79th176th107th
2015-16256th73rd--179th308th230th214th124th287th208th329th17th302nd341st232nd121st209th164th
2014-15188th66th--250th179th269th205th166th90th178th257th310th324th321st246th144th146th131st