TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Hampton  17-16 (0.515)  |  CAA
All-Play Percentage: 0.449 (201st)
Schedule Strength: 0.385 (238th)
Record Quality: -0.074 (218th)
Avg. Season Rank: 251.85 (252nd)
Pace: 64.89 (294th)
Momentum: 5.03 (15th)
Off. Momentum: 1.61 (98th)
Def. Momentum: 3.42 (20th)
Consistency: -9.76 (216th)
Res. Consistency: -13.26 (233rd)
Away From Home: -0.65 (218th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.71 (153rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.18 26.56 70.86 91.80 41.22 33.19 32.19 30.69 37.04 27.92 56.55 11.95 16.64 5.87 36.15 33.43 30.41 2.06
RANK: 223rd 201st 235th 22nd 305th 195th 279th 11th 190th 319th 250th 194th 78th 189th 249th 19th 344th 251st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.56 33.00 -- 83.07 46.00 28.20 33.82 19.88 35.29 34.99 61.90 11.71 13.85 6.30 33.95 23.93 42.12 1.92
RANK: 206th 344th -- 27th 278th 9th 157th 118th 93rd 311th 293rd 144th 125th 219th 25th 171st 346th 350th

ANALYSIS:
If you see Hampton on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. Haslametrics has them ranked 201st overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 17-16. Of the 14 schools in the CAA (average ranking 225.9), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Hampton sports an offensive attack that is mediocre at best. Rated at #223 in offensive efficiency, they score about 105 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Hampton would not consider converting field goal attempts to be a strength. The team is rated #305 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 41.2% of their attempts vs. AO. If Hampton does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 91.80 vs. AO, which ranks #22 in college basketball.

Hampton doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #206 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Hampton fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.00 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #344 in the country in that category. If Hampton does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 83.07 vs. AO, which ranks 27th-best in college basketball.

Hampton has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 15th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Hampton is typically better vs. teams that do not defend well on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.04%, Hampton performs above their norm 89% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 38% of the time.
When facing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Hampton often performs worse than normal. Hampton is more efficient than usual 31% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.15. In their other contests, Hampton performs better than the norm 79% of the time.
Hampton does better vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 87.50, Hampton performs above average 77% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25201st201st183rd218thCAA294th216th238th153rd218th252nd
2023-24338th338th332nd342ndCAA65th346th259th139th148th343rd
2022-23355th355th342nd344thColonial69th306th291st197th244th356th
2021-22330th330th303rd329thBig South42nd196th314th144th214th334th
2020-21319th318th220th278thBig South89th52nd328th111th15th316th
2019-20310th310th241st297thBig South64th298th294th234th241st337th
2018-19157th157th181st216thBig South30th89th251st92nd243rd198th
2017-18292nd292nd161st247thMEAC34th75th345th265th252nd288th
2016-17314th313th230th281stMEAC131st17th340th84th208th321st
2015-16255th255th78th160thMEAC51st157th343rd304th131st261st
2014-15246th245th189th233rdMEAC13th156th329th291st99th270th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25223rd201st235th22nd305th195th279th11th190th319th250th194th78th189th249th19th344th251st
2023-24338th255th203rd168th351st209th349th163rd335th158th332nd255th91st173rd212th159th162nd156th
2022-23327th164th293rd126th354th237th320th91st328th202nd350th304th33rd168th250th101st221st162nd
2021-22350th157th276th261st348th297th332nd31st198th315th354th344th161st226th281st24th308th172nd
2020-21281st274th149th297th261st182nd141st134th143rd313th302nd312th290th222nd147th101st300th271st
2019-20167th39th204th122nd209th300th292nd15th126th281st141st313th91st98th308th22nd294th140th
2018-19130th116th2nd51st269th191st191st36th181st228th256th185th141st134th228th52nd271st199th
2017-18272nd189th38th130th280th332nd336th27th271st123rd234th176th107th152nd336th26th142nd43rd
2016-17331st295th106th154th336th285th310th60th343rd193rd300th214th106th191st295th54th199th100th
2015-16250th63rd249th93rd305th210th341st138th334th80th215th308th92nd117th235th158th114th102nd
2014-15291st60th294th232nd297th261st285th104th242nd225th292nd137th103rd184th252nd83rd203rd130th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25206th344th--27th278th9th157th118th93rd311th293rd144th125th219th25th171st346th350th
2023-24332nd155th--351st240th282nd156th140th262nd329th249th339th247th321st205th79th273rd230th
2022-23357th295th--217th354th219th356th161st310th238th315th92nd261st337th204th134th235th200th
2021-22235th340th--205th198th84th65th236th332nd264th118th44th357th332nd81st225th260th285th
2020-21320th279th--347th183rd302nd237th80th136th335th121st261st351st337th235th35th299th234th
2019-20344th326th--269th324th216th304th212th209th213th343rd64th348th352nd187th186th166th167th
2018-19197th279th--151st171st137th129th209th33rd183rd283rd26th183rd189th138th219th190th208th
2017-18282nd287th--272nd230th200th241st144th186th280th193rd226th345th271st145th114th252nd235th
2016-17228th296th--89th269th49th298th107th186th281st176th198th182nd191st62nd119th304th311th
2015-16257th93rd--234th273rd183rd248th129th260th280th223rd117th102nd200th153rd114th265th250th
2014-15163rd311th--55th187th51st235th184th213th156th144th114th62nd79th81st234th214th258th