TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Fordham  12-21 (0.364)  |  Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.355 (235th)
Schedule Strength: 0.513 (130th)
Record Quality: -0.109 (235th)
Avg. Season Rank: 212.56 (214th)
Pace: 68.10 (83rd)
Momentum: -2.38 (287th)
Off. Momentum: 0.92 (147th)
Def. Momentum: -3.30 (326th)
Consistency: -9.48 (188th)
Res. Consistency: -11.40 (92nd)
Away From Home: 1.22 (27th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.39 (300th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.87 28.91 71.86 87.65 42.33 36.41 32.68 18.57 37.01 32.67 56.10 12.89 18.16 6.19 41.54 21.19 37.27 2.04
RANK: 187th 112th 203rd 157th 253rd 100th 252nd 262nd 191st 151st 262nd 138th 36th 152nd 106th 270th 151st 228th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 112.69 30.32 -- 86.65 46.65 27.23 36.75 21.51 36.43 37.91 59.55 14.61 15.98 6.33 31.43 24.82 43.75 1.88
RANK: 266th 296th -- 156th 300th 3rd 317th 191st 133rd 358th 202nd 330th 282nd 223rd 6th 200th 361st 363rd

ANALYSIS:
If you see Fordham on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They have a record of 12-21 and are ranked 235th overall (out of 364) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #14 team (out of 15) in the A-10 (average ranking 141.1).

Fordham will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 112 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #266 in defensive efficiency. Fordham does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 317th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.8% of their attempts from afar. Luckily, AO will take nowhere near as many threes as they typically would, and only 31.4% of AO's field goal attempts will come from downtown.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Fordham still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 107 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #187 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Fordham has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.61, which ranks 330th in D1. If Fordham does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 18.16 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 36th in all of college hoops.

On the road, Fordham performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 27th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Fordham does better vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 16.65, Fordham performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 36% of the time.
Fordham performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.01, Fordham is more efficient than normal 62% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.
When playing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Fordham usually performs worse than average. Fordham is more efficient than normal 27% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 109.31. In all other contests, Fordham performs better than average 62% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25235th235th306th235thA-1083rd188th130th300th27th214th
2023-24192nd192nd280th219thA-10107th109th124th65th13th196th
2022-23117th116th29th70thA-1051st271st240th65th198th146th
2021-22186th186th188th182ndA-10165th70th140th66th197th209th
2020-21341st341st340th310thA-10351st345th100th48th7th303rd
2019-20247th247th310th299thA-10327th125th220th212th96th243rd
2018-19278th278th271st268thA-10285th334th263rd321st181st226th
2017-18279th279th315th261stA-10265th316th135th250th81st259th
2016-17181st181st257th200thA-10324th241st109th135th189th196th
2015-16150th149th152nd152ndA-10273rd217th180th332nd347th135th
2014-15178th178th298th251stA-10114th113th100th138th174th231st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25187th112th203rd157th253rd100th252nd262nd191st151st262nd138th36th152nd106th270th151st228th
2023-24268th177th333rd158th304th51st260th270th123rd201st342nd101st40th126th56th275th208th284th
2022-23183rd38th64th259th287th77th253rd345th285th95th295th68th28th160th59th345th72nd205th
2021-22308th170th157th181st346th74th342nd312th357th109th280th127th189th227th73rd317th109th226th
2020-21354th331st219th309th355th115th335th220th356th312th300th202nd348th353rd70th192nd295th304th
2019-20344th340th271st250th346th51st263rd199th237th335th340th220th339th347th37th189th329th335th
2018-19308th343rd240th16th342nd25th303rd79th291st295th316th196th215th301st70th119th328th325th
2017-18316th338th237th254th285th14th337th339th210th245th136th10th321st334th12th337th223rd324th
2016-17274th351st99th185th245th14th239th332nd344th167th139th10th317th309th16th334th167th304th
2015-16202nd304th227th214th178th49th248th303rd216th216th106th14th175th207th42nd303rd209th294th
2014-15197th263rd76th168th190th108th292nd149th93rd264th110th30th231st175th114th159th272nd254th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25266th296th--156th300th3rd317th191st133rd358th202nd330th282nd223rd6th200th361st363rd
2023-24128th348th--9th203rd3rd213th169th290th206th51st65th167th285th22nd244th317th340th
2022-2381st326th--24th124th4th76th146th253rd306th28th171st127th74th15th200th347th356th
2021-2261st199th--145th93rd54th40th264th260th229th40th173rd55th40th66th278th235th283rd
2020-21197th126th--272nd123rd356th163rd38th225th70th191st265th289th50th354th22nd47th8th
2019-2076th226th--77th70th333rd43rd25th162nd70th144th307th39th46th342nd28th74th24th
2018-19174th270th--96th183rd107th254th165th111th179th170th190th107th55th141st185th212th219th
2017-18201st127th--141st299th28th251st255th245th232nd290th121st294th326th32nd266th248th310th
2016-1786th263rd--5th183rd103rd200th67th78th62nd251st73rd125th201st241st138th158th138th
2015-16111th131st--23rd214th162nd170th116th150th63rd298th259th229th279th251st173rd127th113th
2014-15167th170th--156th162nd245th181st183rd136th95th237th306th228th167th261st188th97th78th