TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 FAU  25-9 (0.735)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.848 (56th)
Schedule Strength: 0.590 (92nd)
Record Quality: 0.368 (25th)
Avg. Season Rank: 35.26 (30th)
Pace: 68.93 (102nd)
Momentum: -2.53 (276th)
Off. Momentum: -2.28 (318th)
Def. Momentum: -0.25 (163rd)
Consistency: -9.52 (220th)
Res. Consistency: -9.97 (34th)
Away From Home: -0.98 (271st)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.05 (92nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 114.75 30.27 71.95 85.72 47.78 32.27 34.24 17.73 43.43 35.72 62.18 12.95 12.21 4.65 37.65 20.68 41.67 1.96
RANK: 34th 40th 185th 165th 36th 151st 180th 327th 32nd 30th 66th 100th 232nd 268th 151st 331st 34th 88th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.46 21.88 -- 86.53 42.98 30.93 32.84 27.13 41.93 28.48 54.98 8.59 11.87 4.58 35.74 31.35 32.91 2.03
RANK: 80th 25th -- 236th 106th 158th 97th 322nd 306th 88th 67th 12th 61st 62nd 125th 320th 70th 133rd

ANALYSIS:
FAU has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. They have a record of 25-9 and are ranked 56th overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 14 schools in the AAC (average ranking 134.8), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

FAU succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 34th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 114 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. FAU allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.59, which ranks #12 in the country. FAU also has a keen ability to drain field goals between the three-point line and the low post. The squad is ranked 32nd nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 43.4% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. However, even with their high conversion rate on mid-range attempts, this team usually settles for shots from other spots on the floor. Only about 20.7% of their overall attempts vs. AO are from those in-between locations. The squad likewise lands in the top-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, making good on about 47.8% of their total attempts vs. AO.

FAU plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 80th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 100 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. FAU is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.88 vs. AO, they are currently rated 25th in the country in that category. FAU also does a fairly satisfactory job to deny opponents chances to score off of the offensive glass. They have a rating of 11.87 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 61st in the country).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, FAU often performs better than normal. FAU is more efficient than usual 73% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.91%. In their other contests, FAU performs better than the norm 26% of the time.
FAU does worse vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.38, FAU performs above average 10% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 54% of the time.
FAU performs better against squads that prefer the outside shot. When facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.01, FAU is more efficient than normal 60% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 26% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25122nd122nd176th141stAAC90th163rd110th284th138th102nd
2023-2456th56th30th25thAAC102nd220th92nd92nd271st30th
2022-2319th19th1st11thConference USA180th262nd102nd111th121st40th
2021-22129th129th153rd188thConference USA146th271st213th251st333rd170th
2020-21165th164th133rd211thConference USA176th243rd214th224th285th209th
2019-20192nd192nd166th197thConference USA115th80th190th183rd237th237th
2018-19165th165th170th190thConference USA142nd235th178th76th191st166th
2017-18212th212th268th268thConference USA103rd165th155th119th127th240th
2016-17271st271st288th296thConference USA72nd207th209th238th26th256th
2015-16289th289th327th295thConference USA178th193rd176th209th194th282nd
2014-15288th288th309th304thConference USA232nd206th198th93rd164th236th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2589th105th263rd149th93rd160th99th306th217th30th148th193rd71st99th170th310th32nd95th
2023-2434th40th185th165th36th151st180th327th32nd30th66th100th232nd268th151st331st34th88th
2022-2334th161st200th31st73rd27th80th347th37th26th180th59th188th72nd48th349th51st199th
2021-22125th208th173rd182nd116th100th139th300th38th103rd199th135th128th120th96th304th102nd201st
2020-21199th157th324th117th233rd104th158th286th319th69th238th80th79th151st114th302nd78th165th
2019-20226th342nd225th58th238th66th242nd93rd226th303rd87th111th211th157th86th109th312th309th
2018-19276th281st34th156th318th42nd294th90th68th344th266th229th166th272nd43rd86th348th345th
2017-18291st239th104th35th319th338th302nd1st248th287th294th166th78th118th341st2nd310th82nd
2016-17287th259th145th72nd300th221st325th91st250th141st270th224th72nd115th239th104th182nd131st
2015-16321st269th119th230th323rd181st263rd178th341st192nd312th130th222nd284th170th171st181st182nd
2014-15269th339th274th124th243rd74th170th128th220th301st193rd306th206th214th87th132nd309th302nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25216th137th--303rd127th170th298th179th88th322nd52nd237th316th240th124th144th287th272nd
2023-2480th25th--236th106th158th97th322nd306th88th67th12th61st62nd125th320th70th133rd
2022-2326th32nd--242nd22nd186th72nd345th134th33rd9th1st83rd89th163rd344th24th74th
2021-22147th237th--62nd214th41st315th249th246th179th96th104th143rd71st64th291st226th279th
2020-21164th331st--28th179th74th292nd214th293rd79th47th10th24th9th125th272nd126th171st
2019-20148th152nd--80th236th123rd266th232nd303rd74th165th139th139th218th166th259th88th137th
2018-1972nd106th--125th90th224th100th250th181st61st120th174th30th34th240th262nd58th72nd
2017-18122nd199th--185th133rd64th67th246th182nd221st110th206th53rd33rd60th248th224th268th
2016-17229th203rd--180th245th37th313th281st234th223rd151st255th208th192nd35th281st221st285th
2015-16223rd217th--273rd211th4th266th330th162nd310th131st283rd339th314th1st322nd293rd346th
2014-15286th207th--266th322nd1st53rd350th342nd279th281st289th232nd290th1st350th252nd346th