TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 FAU  12-19 (0.387)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.397 (212th)
Schedule Strength: 0.509 (155th)
Record Quality: -0.184 (268th)
Avg. Season Rank: 239.11 (240th)
Pace: 71.23 (103rd)
Momentum: 3.16 (41st)
Off. Momentum: 3.46 (32nd)
Def. Momentum: -0.30 (163rd)
Consistency: -8.98 (165th)
Res. Consistency: -11.53 (154th)
Away From Home: 0.06 (127th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.36 (119th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.89 24.45 73.64 85.28 40.60 23.45 32.56 36.20 35.42 25.63 55.27 11.04 16.64 7.25 27.50 42.44 30.06 1.97
RANK: 291st 239th 104th 35th 319th 338th 302nd 1st 248th 287th 294th 166th 78th 118th 341st 2nd 310th 82nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.99 26.63 -- 82.25 43.56 28.08 33.25 24.23 37.36 29.95 58.24 11.20 12.79 5.21 34.14 29.45 36.41 1.98
RANK: 122nd 199th -- 185th 133rd 64th 67th 246th 182nd 221st 110th 206th 53rd 33rd 60th 248th 224th 268th

ANALYSIS:
FAU has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. They have a record of 12-19 and are ranked 212th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 14 schools in Conference USA (average ranking 163.7), they're currently ranked as our #10 team in the conference.

FAU will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 122nd in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. FAU is one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 5.2% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 33rd in the NCAA). FAU also owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 67th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 33.3% of their attempts from afar.

Unfortunately, FAU is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 291st in offensive efficiency, scoring about 95 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. FAU has a hard time converting field goals attempts on offense. The team is rated #319 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 40.6% of their attempts vs. AO. FAU also won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 302nd in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 32.6% of their attempts from long vs. AO. If FAU does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 85.28 vs. AO, which ranks #35 in college basketball.

FAU has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #41 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, FAU often performs better than normal. FAU is more efficient than usual 83% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.35. In their other contests, FAU performs better than the norm 31% of the time.
FAU does worse vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.74%, FAU performs above average 25% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
FAU performs worse against squads that convert well from the charity stripe. When facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 67.65%, FAU is more efficient than normal 40% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 88% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25122nd122nd176th141stAAC90th163rd110th284th138th102nd
2023-2456th56th30th25thAAC102nd220th92nd92nd271st30th
2022-2319th19th1st11thConference USA180th262nd102nd111th121st40th
2021-22129th129th153rd188thConference USA146th271st213th251st333rd170th
2020-21165th164th133rd211thConference USA176th243rd214th224th285th209th
2019-20192nd192nd166th197thConference USA115th80th190th183rd237th237th
2018-19165th165th170th190thConference USA142nd235th178th76th191st166th
2017-18212th212th268th268thConference USA103rd165th155th119th127th240th
2016-17271st271st288th296thConference USA72nd207th209th238th26th256th
2015-16289th289th327th295thConference USA178th193rd176th209th194th282nd
2014-15288th288th309th304thConference USA232nd206th198th93rd164th236th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2589th105th263rd149th93rd160th99th306th217th30th148th193rd71st99th170th310th32nd95th
2023-2434th40th185th165th36th151st180th327th32nd30th66th100th232nd268th151st331st34th88th
2022-2334th161st200th31st73rd27th80th347th37th26th180th59th188th72nd48th349th51st199th
2021-22125th208th173rd182nd116th100th139th300th38th103rd199th135th128th120th96th304th102nd201st
2020-21199th157th324th117th233rd104th158th286th319th69th238th80th79th151st114th302nd78th165th
2019-20226th342nd225th58th238th66th242nd93rd226th303rd87th111th211th157th86th109th312th309th
2018-19276th281st34th156th318th42nd294th90th68th344th266th229th166th272nd43rd86th348th345th
2017-18291st239th104th35th319th338th302nd1st248th287th294th166th78th118th341st2nd310th82nd
2016-17287th259th145th72nd300th221st325th91st250th141st270th224th72nd115th239th104th182nd131st
2015-16321st269th119th230th323rd181st263rd178th341st192nd312th130th222nd284th170th171st181st182nd
2014-15269th339th274th124th243rd74th170th128th220th301st193rd306th206th214th87th132nd309th302nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25216th137th--303rd127th170th298th179th88th322nd52nd237th316th240th124th144th287th272nd
2023-2480th25th--236th106th158th97th322nd306th88th67th12th61st62nd125th320th70th133rd
2022-2326th32nd--242nd22nd186th72nd345th134th33rd9th1st83rd89th163rd344th24th74th
2021-22147th237th--62nd214th41st315th249th246th179th96th104th143rd71st64th291st226th279th
2020-21164th331st--28th179th74th292nd214th293rd79th47th10th24th9th125th272nd126th171st
2019-20148th152nd--80th236th123rd266th232nd303rd74th165th139th139th218th166th259th88th137th
2018-1972nd106th--125th90th224th100th250th181st61st120th174th30th34th240th262nd58th72nd
2017-18122nd199th--185th133rd64th67th246th182nd221st110th206th53rd33rd60th248th224th268th
2016-17229th203rd--180th245th37th313th281st234th223rd151st255th208th192nd35th281st221st285th
2015-16223rd217th--273rd211th4th266th330th162nd310th131st283rd339th314th1st322nd293rd346th
2014-15286th207th--266th322nd1st53rd350th342nd279th281st289th232nd290th1st350th252nd346th