TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Elon  17-16 (0.515)  |  CAA
All-Play Percentage: 0.372 (230th)
Schedule Strength: 0.354 (279th)
Record Quality: -0.103 (231st)
Avg. Season Rank: 188.35 (186th)
Pace: 64.46 (314th)
Momentum: -6.35 (357th)
Off. Momentum: -0.53 (233rd)
Def. Momentum: -5.81 (360th)
Consistency: -10.41 (299th)
Res. Consistency: -17.45 (353rd)
Away From Home: -0.67 (222nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.97 (13th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.57 30.11 75.68 85.12 42.72 35.09 34.36 22.13 37.37 27.90 57.48 9.48 16.59 7.53 41.22 26.00 32.78 2.08
RANK: 176th 75th 65th 278th 225th 132nd 160th 168th 179th 320th 218th 312th 82nd 52nd 115th 151st 302nd 294th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 114.67 24.78 -- 97.16 42.62 41.04 34.26 23.64 39.12 32.48 55.72 17.36 18.99 7.95 42.24 24.33 33.43 2.09
RANK: 303rd 87th -- 364th 105th 359th 189th 278th 243rd 207th 73rd 364th 361st 348th 308th 185th 64th 56th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Elon should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Carrying a record of 17-16, they are currently rated #230 overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 14 schools in the CAA (average ranking 225.9), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Based on the data, Elon will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 108 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #176 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Elon does a pretty solid job of scoring points off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 7.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 52nd nationally). Elon also converts a fair amount of its free throws. Making 75.7% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 65th nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-75 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 30.11 vs. AO. If Elon does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's penchant for allowing too many easy buckets off of giveaways. The squad has a rating of 17.36 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of steals, which ranks worst in the college game.

The defense for Elon, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 303rd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 115 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Elon allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked last in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 97.16 vs. AO. Elon also gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 18.99 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (fourth from the bottom nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 8.0% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 348th) as well.

Elon has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked eighth from the bottom in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, Elon usually performs better than average. Elon is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.99. In all other contests, Elon performs better than average 46% of the time.
Elon is typically worse vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.19, Elon performs above their norm 36% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 77% of the time.
When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Elon often performs better than normal. Elon is more efficient than usual 74% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.60%. In their other contests, Elon performs better than the norm 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25230th229th183rd231stCAA314th299th279th13th222nd186th
2023-24317th317th271st288thCAA184th91st289th180th113th306th
2022-23324th323rd342nd349thColonial266th102nd289th22nd102nd333rd
2021-22239th239th305th259thColonial269th336th110th272nd246th254th
2020-21180th180th163rd181stColonial306th333rd187th294th284th211th
2019-20248th248th276th269thColonial294th229th202nd226th86th277th
2018-19292nd292nd289th307thColonial121st342nd271st211th138th321st
2017-18259th259th230th232ndColonial199th242nd183rd122nd88th232nd
2016-17148th147th134th155thColonial204th157th165th71st99th162nd
2015-16160th160th186th166thColonial52nd282nd133rd297th10th167th
2014-15278th278th216th254thColonial30th223rd244th34th144th255th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25176th75th65th278th225th132nd160th168th179th320th218th312th82nd52nd115th151st302nd294th
2023-24266th168th244th289th289th59th185th277th287th282nd262nd147th144th192nd35th264th262nd314th
2022-23324th318th173rd255th305th118th344th222nd74th266th288th262nd218th275th105th203rd245th268th
2021-22245th297th60th176th271st62nd235th243rd100th263rd277th277th234th321st60th249th268th307th
2020-21212th337th60th70th284th19th139th164th162nd316th297th182nd282nd319th32nd185th338th343rd
2019-20219th286th144th209th292nd7th65th207th102nd350th307th288th242nd256th3rd206th350th353rd
2018-19255th323rd214th185th265th9th222nd182nd55th352nd136th352nd311th316th8th174th352nd351st
2017-18214th348th207th89th245th4th206th239th46th346th168th312th305th321st4th260th349th351st
2016-17197th320th190th86th249th8th187th224th160th329th177th335th299th276th11th253rd334th346th
2015-16140th286th301st102nd156th12th165th292nd174th277th79th221st192nd196th16th305th296th336th
2014-15284th216th236th265th280th78th185th132nd295th342nd163rd230th278th340th65th109th339th331st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25303rd87th--364th105th359th189th278th243rd207th73rd364th361st348th308th185th64th56th
2023-24340th111th--321st310th322nd265th80th191st283rd342nd191st326th347th286th43rd229th145th
2022-23310th127th--342nd172nd360th272nd135th193rd64th260th319th256th258th352nd61st31st15th
2021-22255th345th--83rd182nd181st195th71st225th208th112th316th311th246th215th91st241st199th
2020-21125th234th--76th162nd239th153rd77th34th141st299th278th37th22nd282nd91st175th113th
2019-20309th330th--98th226th259th312th80th118th128th223rd226th93rd85th283rd87th153rd108th
2018-19288th84th--309th242nd290th305th141st100th227th246th312th178th210th248th103rd169th141st
2017-18297th30th--349th186th347th292nd266th288th74th174th317th202nd297th329th209th29th15th
2016-17104th7th--350th70th325th57th345th236th20th195th258th157th141st273rd337th6th19th
2015-16189th91st--246th243rd43rd198th329th311th155th218th257th275th281st32nd326th119th237th
2014-15217th271st--46th304th101st170th278th317th31st345th244th254th332nd140th328th56th110th