TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 ETSU  16-14 (0.533)  |  Southern
All-Play Percentage: 0.400 (212th)
Schedule Strength: 0.429 (238th)
Record Quality: -0.068 (210th)
Avg. Season Rank: 180.31 (176th)
Pace: 68.34 (34th)
Momentum: -1.24 (241st)
Off. Momentum: -3.28 (340th)
Def. Momentum: 2.04 (25th)
Consistency: -7.60 (22nd)
Res. Consistency: -6.34 (1st)
Away From Home: 0.79 (81st)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.05 (32nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.51 26.86 72.78 82.36 39.92 36.91 35.76 22.51 33.31 22.94 53.10 16.86 15.48 5.11 44.81 27.33 27.85 2.17
RANK: 198th 247th 66th 156th 299th 9th 109th 273rd 264th 338th 307th 2nd 160th 308th 8th 283rd 342nd 349th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.68 33.79 -- 78.21 44.29 30.66 35.79 21.85 34.92 25.71 62.38 13.21 16.60 7.97 39.20 27.93 32.87 2.06
RANK: 222nd 315th -- 40th 210th 286th 241st 41st 149th 77th 277th 307th 274th 281st 325th 69th 109th 50th

ANALYSIS:
ETSU has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Carrying a record of 16-14, they are currently rated #212 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 10) in the Southern (average ranking 238.8).

Though their defense is far from abysmal, ETSU is not really proficient on that end of the court either. Allowing about 104 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they are ranked #222 in defensive efficiency. ETSU commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.79 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #315 in the country in that category. If ETSU does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their willingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of steals. The team has a solid rating of 16.86 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks second-best in college basketball.

ETSU doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #198 in the nation in offensive efficiency. ETSU is one of the more deficient teams in the nation as it pertains to scoring off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 5.1% of all second-chance opportunities (308th nationally). ETSU also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 307th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 53.1% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

ETSU is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 22nd in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, ETSU usually performs better than average. ETSU is more efficient than normal 69% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.15%. In all other contests, ETSU performs better than average 8% of the time.
ETSU is typically better vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.55%, ETSU performs above their norm 78% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 26% of the time.
When facing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, ETSU often performs worse than normal. ETSU is more efficient than usual 15% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.55%. In their other contests, ETSU performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25165th165th124th162ndSouthern289th281st280th211th326th157th
2023-24186th185th170th158thSouthern188th39th171st184th91st228th
2022-23246th245th280th281stSouthern260th34th259th170th8th247th
2021-22184th184th209th203rdSouthern249th165th144th95th163rd161st
2020-21134th134th172nd151stSouthern318th303rd119th153rd271st130th
2019-2068th68th6th22ndSouthern300th115th184th21st26th63rd
2018-19116th116th49th90thSouthern134th113th218th200th83rd98th
2017-18104th104th34th78thSouthern198th38th242nd121st124th97th
2016-1776th76th21st44thSouthern79th36th144th282nd154th73rd
2015-16165th165th68th107thSouthern53rd204th197th232nd84th173rd
2014-15212th211th156th210thSouthern34th22nd238th32nd81st176th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25183rd134th335th79th261st81st146th224th314th172nd260th139th68th123rd108th237th203rd247th
2023-24241st111th320th80th320th80th291st229th285th149th299th74th3rd76th101st247th183rd238th
2022-23260th172nd318th219th207th268th308th161st179th141st168th243rd73rd100th262nd150th126th109th
2021-2296th289th195th34th135th60th86th193rd236th177th113th104th111th183rd94th233rd228th264th
2020-21137th168th242nd131st203rd29th70th230th213th282nd213th90th207th183rd39th243rd290th320th
2019-2084th88th194th151st107th144th118th249th200th106th116th57th244th182nd142nd251st112th166th
2018-19109th253rd340th114th47th202nd97th179th57th95th93rd66th6th5th215th184th118th115th
2017-18150th210th180th148th135th211th151st231st294th48th144th39th159th122nd226th240th50th71st
2016-17121st108th213th325th48th254th73rd285th44th61st133rd11th269th87th222nd267th36th50th
2015-16151st254th136th149th155th94th58th198th81st210th251st61st145th130th105th212th224th254th
2014-15198th247th66th156th299th9th109th273rd264th338th307th2nd160th308th8th283rd342nd349th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25123rd264th--75th183rd89th272nd148th250th224th73rd137th235th227th117th181st266th264th
2023-24144th321st--50th174th91st75th55th183rd275th169th282nd148th246th134th80th314th293rd
2022-23235th84th--277th202nd316th130th159th127th182nd330th342nd257th318th290th117th144th96th
2021-22281st102nd--308th246th338th188th100th310th210th275th61st290th227th313th57th142nd69th
2020-21137th285th--56th134th225th205th31st51st176th168th135th126th143rd287th48th224th145th
2019-2058th182nd--21st207th26th51st195th131st126th298th63rd19th156th65th249th218th269th
2018-19134th195th--36th202nd60th332nd218th80th105th163rd191st251st166th106th270th162nd212th
2017-1857th224th--95th77th82nd38th217th63rd158th105th172nd167th185th107th241st178th212th
2016-1760th247th--11th100th78th143rd87th220th141st44th316th170th198th167th132nd226th218th
2015-16206th310th--62nd203rd128th176th113th193rd178th210th225th239th265th180th145th222nd202nd
2014-15222nd315th--40th210th286th241st41st149th77th277th307th274th281st325th69th109th50th