TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Drexel  18-15 (0.545)  |  CAA
All-Play Percentage: 0.471 (193rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.340 (291st)
Record Quality: -0.055 (203rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 197.94 (195th)
Pace: 63.03 (355th)
Momentum: 2.05 (91st)
Off. Momentum: 2.66 (49th)
Def. Momentum: -0.61 (206th)
Consistency: -9.30 (164th)
Res. Consistency: -8.14 (2nd)
Away From Home: 0.12 (135th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.17 (194th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.77 21.01 69.59 89.42 44.41 33.28 35.25 27.54 41.20 28.60 58.16 7.61 12.29 4.22 37.22 30.80 31.98 2.05
RANK: 212th 355th 270th 82nd 148th 193rd 105th 37th 46th 305th 193rd 358th 293rd 330th 219th 40th 320th 241st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.63 25.01 -- 92.25 43.75 32.44 32.73 23.15 40.80 36.66 55.35 15.08 16.54 6.53 35.17 25.09 39.74 1.95
RANK: 183rd 92nd -- 352nd 154th 127th 98th 255th 301st 342nd 61st 339th 316th 249th 58th 211th 299th 320th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Drexel should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Ranked 193rd overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 18-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 14) in the CAA (average ranking 225.9).

Offensively, Drexel finds itself in the lower half of the rankings. The team is rated 212th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 106 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Drexel does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.01 vs. AO, they are tenth from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. Drexel also has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 15.08, which ranks 339th in D1. If Drexel does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully hit from mid-range locations on the court. The team makes 41.2% of their in-between field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 46th in the NCAA.

Drexel doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #183 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Drexel is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #358 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.61 vs. AO. Drexel also allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked 352nd in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 92.25 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Drexel performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.03%, Drexel is more efficient than normal 90% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 32% of the time.
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Drexel usually performs better than average. Drexel is more efficient than normal 71% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 111.59. In all other contests, Drexel performs better than average 27% of the time.
Drexel is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 46.36%, Drexel performs above their norm 80% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 36% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25193rd193rd154th203rdCAA355th164th291st194th135th195th
2023-24122nd122nd94th123rdCAA314th344th218th285th337th120th
2022-23206th206th166th216thColonial347th363rd306th281st316th206th
2021-22158th158th181st161stColonial241st3rd143rd140th59th150th
2020-21150th149th112th144thColonial320th192nd203rd284th98th143rd
2019-20245th245th253rd230thColonial224th119th211th159th300th216th
2018-19261st261st249th249thColonial148th184th232nd276th226th242nd
2017-18254th254th264th257thColonial139th222nd227th3rd152nd261st
2016-17266th266th312th285thColonial69th100th171st215th197th253rd
2015-16240th240th344th278thColonial329th143rd99th95th124th240th
2014-15256th256th274th248thColonial330th327th191st156th2nd251st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25212th355th270th82nd148th193rd105th37th46th305th193rd358th293rd330th219th40th320th241st
2023-24121st156th149th77th149th282nd141st90th299th89th113th345th123rd119th297th107th118th74th
2022-23266th220th329th160th252nd114th336th151st79th273rd177th249th211th228th115th157th284th276th
2021-22148th311th232nd38th117th229th192nd46th31st172nd175th159th260th279th263rd61st221st137th
2020-21112th259th20th188th97th232nd5th73rd175th259th182nd328th247th275th233rd78th254th185th
2019-20234th292nd170th207th201st213th127th144th224th187th212th231st60th22nd213th137th166th151st
2018-19142nd115th36th92nd187th274th238th102nd91st78th254th311th55th225th291st114th103rd69th
2017-18207th233rd200th55th230th182nd316th146th169th80th215th211th102nd184th219th165th115th119th
2016-17218th223rd295th121st231st159th222nd207th316th96th190th183rd121st107th173rd212th111th159th
2015-16242nd107th224th114th300th265th177th23rd309th280th274th335th163rd299th275th25th294th157th
2014-15256th267th51st123rd310th92nd202nd94th272nd311th296th303rd252nd337th107th96th322nd299th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25183rd92nd--352nd154th127th98th255th301st342nd61st339th316th249th58th211th299th320th
2023-24130th47th--307th149th90th85th338th240th176th162nd192nd101st153rd54th326th131st240th
2022-23139th20th--324th183rd9th233rd361st65th211th265th290th152nd257th3rd361st150th319th
2021-22181st69th--278th223rd22nd125th332nd281st271st191st53rd101st200th14th331st240th324th
2020-21202nd30th--333rd256th9th92nd348th259th313th216th228th306th261st3rd338th265th343rd
2019-20286th132nd--310th291st16th82nd241st254th349th219th344th320th308th8th210th347th350th
2018-19328th127th--331st335th85th307th268th310th321st284th217th63rd176th29th230th290th314th
2017-18303rd137th--338th264th62nd240th206th258th347th135th315th338th314th25th136th330th333rd
2016-17275th256th--156th283rd129th226th139th180th243rd297th204th251st218th121st149th253rd245th
2015-16215th327th--38th288th15th220th187th270th247th242nd38th62nd191st18th242nd291st322nd
2014-15213th168th--291st207th75th131st170th73rd333rd214th134th329th226th46th134th319th320th