TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Denver  17-17 (0.500)  |  Summit League
All-Play Percentage: 0.269 (266th)
Schedule Strength: 0.340 (275th)
Record Quality: -0.147 (258th)
Avg. Season Rank: 236.25 (242nd)
Pace: 69.89 (60th)
Momentum: -4.16 (325th)
Off. Momentum: -6.20 (362nd)
Def. Momentum: 2.04 (49th)
Consistency: -10.33 (302nd)
Res. Consistency: -12.64 (215th)
Away From Home: 0.73 (96th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.75 (45th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.52 26.57 70.76 86.35 42.77 36.01 32.91 22.77 44.57 27.57 54.18 10.20 14.25 4.84 41.70 26.37 31.93 2.10
RANK: 191st 176th 246th 135th 248th 47th 251st 176th 19th 296th 286th 243rd 138th 242nd 52nd 185th 308th 323rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 113.84 27.32 -- 87.25 47.68 29.56 36.38 27.07 45.41 30.62 60.58 10.64 13.46 6.00 33.88 31.03 35.09 1.99
RANK: 343rd 234th -- 275th 339th 88th 301st 320th 353rd 168th 283rd 119th 188th 251st 67th 311th 135th 233rd

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Denver should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Carrying a record of 17-17, they are currently rated #266 overall (out of 362) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the nine schools in the Summit League (average ranking 231.6), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

Denver has a very sieve-like defense that gives up points way too easily. The team is ranked 343rd in efficiency on that end of the court and gives up more than 113 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Denver performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked tenth from the bottom nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 45.4% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Denver is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #339 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.7% of their total attempts from the floor.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in offensive efficiency, Denver isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Scoring roughly 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #191 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Denver fares worse than most teams when it comes to converting from locations close to the hoop. The team is ranked 286th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 54.2% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. If Denver does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully hit from mid-range locations on the court. The team makes 44.6% of their in-between field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 19th in the NCAA.

Denver has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 325th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Denver is typically worse vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.47%, Denver performs above their norm 11% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.
When facing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, Denver often performs worse than normal. Denver is more efficient than usual 23% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.09. In their other contests, Denver performs better than the norm 71% of the time.
Denver does better vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.23%, Denver performs above average 69% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 29% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25294th294th313th302ndSummit League230th54th185th56th186th302nd
2023-24266th265th193rd258thSummit League60th302nd275th45th96th242nd
2022-23301st300th220th276thSummit League98th71st343rd312th275th287th
2021-22276th276th290th286thSummit League226th101st300th276th121st294th
2020-21332nd332nd342nd353rdSummit League77th10th225th163rd312th340th
2019-20282nd282nd335th319thSummit League42nd42nd185th77th271st296th
2018-19319th319th328th320thSummit League204th335th227th341st317th322nd
2017-18226th226th182nd204thSummit League243rd329th202nd303rd274th250th
2016-17198th197th158th186thSummit League251st196th219th224th127th166th
2015-16176th176th175th178thSummit League349th307th222nd162nd27th193rd
2014-15215th215th258th244thSummit League350th330th223rd260th242nd219th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25300th284th141st308th230th287th212th28th30th351st320th243rd239th228th253rd17th347th254th
2023-24191st176th246th135th248th47th251st176th19th296th286th243rd138th242nd52nd185th308th323rd
2022-23296th59th171st363rd118th356th305th298th146th28th217th306th133rd73rd341st246th3rd2nd
2021-22222nd219th212th315th160th173rd39th239th195th260th210th351st348th325th127th209th206th230th
2020-21308th228th139th324th277th245th221st176th265th266th261st339th332nd336th200th134th204th184th
2019-20299th103rd240th346th193rd335th268th143rd130th159th265th195th198th173rd318th85th83rd36th
2018-19286th321st18th240th236th241st199th86th158th243rd247th305th282nd296th224th69th236th183rd
2017-18242nd217th242nd332nd127th308th26th123rd198th206th229th347th140th182nd284th95th145th89th
2016-17150th199th117th283rd63rd307th36th87th26th212th184th340th266th172nd279th69th179th92nd
2015-16182nd310th13th349th72nd87th33rd350th193rd127th166th339th351st339th33rd348th37th223rd
2014-15172nd327th7th338th59th42nd85th350th236th114th87th335th350th350th18th350th46th250th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25256th364th--8th299th14th209th276th359th65th170th306th96th230th53rd334th145th250th
2023-24343rd234th--275th339th88th301st320th353rd168th283rd119th188th251st67th311th135th233rd
2022-23307th102nd--326th235th284th258th152nd144th295th243rd359th120th187th230th87th251st192nd
2021-22315th240th--251st269th246th273rd65th314th302nd159th326th256th308th213th44th290th231st
2020-21343rd351st--20th347th99th343rd134th340th96th315th300th68th309th173rd206th163rd169th
2019-20261st288th--110th229th247th100th23rd186th248th269th246th188th197th268th20th268th174th
2018-19334th152nd--293rd281st309th353rd64th129th249th150th300th31st49th284th44th208th137th
2017-18218th256th--187th155th309th96th154th179th85th284th289th14th34th309th147th87th54th
2016-17279th255th--235th191st211th260th194th150th192nd168th282nd203rd194th179th186th165th180th
2015-16185th304th--12th244th53rd238th41st81st226th236th264th258th334th143rd81st295th284th
2014-15276th331st--9th330th18th255th42nd224th297th311th264th276th328th34th97th338th333rd