TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Dayton  25-8 (0.758)  |  Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.898 (38th)
Schedule Strength: 0.618 (85th)
Record Quality: 0.400 (15th)
Avg. Season Rank: 33.31 (28th)
Pace: 65.32 (327th)
Momentum: -3.85 (318th)
Off. Momentum: -2.90 (338th)
Def. Momentum: -0.94 (203rd)
Consistency: -9.03 (160th)
Res. Consistency: -11.00 (97th)
Away From Home: -0.71 (245th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.87 (267th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.19 27.89 73.78 83.50 48.17 35.43 39.99 18.98 36.56 29.08 65.72 10.52 12.27 5.95 42.44 22.73 34.83 2.08
RANK: 32nd 121st 118th 277th 26th 66th 3rd 295th 277th 251st 14th 224th 228th 134th 42nd 284th 228th 299th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.58 18.62 -- 89.90 41.32 35.41 30.73 29.22 38.56 25.27 59.36 9.50 12.92 4.68 39.39 32.50 28.11 2.11
RANK: 54th 3rd -- 341st 54th 327th 19th 349th 158th 10th 241st 45th 145th 73rd 282nd 340th 3rd 15th

ANALYSIS:
Dayton has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. Ranked 38th overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 25-8. Of the 15 schools in the A-10 (average ranking 123.4), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Dayton succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 32nd in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 115 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Dayton is an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They convert 40.0% of their three-pointers (third in the nation), 65.7% of their near-proximity attempts (14th), and 48.2% of their total shots from the field (26th) vs. AO. Dayton will also make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 42nd in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts.

Dayton plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 54th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 99 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Dayton is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 18.62 vs. AO, they are currently rated third in the country in that category. Dayton also does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank 19th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 30.7% of their attempts from afar. If Dayton does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 89.90 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 22nd-worst in college basketball.

Dayton has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 318th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Dayton performs worse against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.13, Dayton is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 80% of the time.
When playing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Dayton usually performs worse than average. Dayton is more efficient than normal 26% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.18. In all other contests, Dayton performs better than average 71% of the time.
Dayton is typically worse vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.57%, Dayton performs above their norm 28% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2578th78th58th56thA-10268th318th87th19th72nd58th
2023-2438th38th23rd15thA-10327th160th85th267th245th28th
2022-2370th70th78th85thA-10354th333rd131st153rd297th66th
2021-2234th34th65th61stA-10335th317th125th32nd83rd60th
2020-21103rd103rd125th78thA-10307th108th95th4th223rd92nd
2019-209th9th3rd6thA-10209th11th111th18th101st8th
2018-1955th55th81st76thA-10321st180th103rd266th32nd53rd
2017-18171st170th222nd172ndA-10257th134th105th140th343rd151st
2016-1742nd42nd29th33rdA-10147th200th81st254th281st42nd
2015-1663rd63rd27th22ndA-10193rd280th79th186th101st41st
2014-1552nd52nd21st25thA-10203rd38th83rd118th265th51st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2562nd58th80th195th97th86th63rd325th286th90th117th70th182nd240th85th325th89th196th
2023-2432nd121st118th277th26th66th3rd295th277th251st14th224th228th134th42nd284th228th299th
2022-2388th121st276th190th50th141st112th192nd129th228th21st348th162nd266th133rd182nd217th233rd
2021-2265th148th294th217th17th268th54th218th262nd53rd10th195th162nd63rd267th205th52nd50th
2020-2168th214th181st308th12th161st19th192nd6th305th20th256th343rd271st117th153rd277th272nd
2019-207th120th152nd247th1st147th25th294th10th107th1st172nd335th87th116th290th88th162nd
2018-1944th205th241st162nd5th253rd218th184th26th77th3rd276th281st39th250th180th79th78th
2017-18136th294th146th295th51st57th248th236th19th319th2nd227th264th215th38th229th307th326th
2016-1759th30th194th296th52nd129th40th238th217th259th23rd55th330th318th93rd219th221st249th
2015-16136th96th232nd254th96th206th156th186th217th168th57th102nd266th258th184th179th145th147th
2014-1578th14th197th342nd33rd157th102nd271st44th304th18th43rd349th333rd79th216th250th268th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25126th143rd--120th139th174th174th178th36th143rd257th91st80th119th209th196th158th152nd
2023-2454th3rd--341st54th327th19th349th158th10th241st45th145th73rd282nd340th3rd15th
2022-2361st21st--346th30th301st19th325th148th81st60th48th258th240th237th300th39th61st
2021-2226th24th--253rd28th177th46th323rd20th87th97th48th35th42nd148th317th62nd116th
2020-21123rd78th--332nd73rd334th152nd333rd158th20th148th88th236th176th301st316th10th15th
2019-2034th115th--173rd56th52nd84th344th26th42nd218th32nd122nd80th52nd347th47th169th
2018-1985th14th--305th76th239th101st323rd22nd79th228th76th149th224th187th310th44th90th
2017-18212th66th--129th294th175th302nd344th346th2nd338th104th76th238th199th345th3rd17th
2016-1737th147th--70th47th203rd40th293rd29th12th238th1st113th165th250th322nd21st35th
2015-1613th67th--115th34th106th117th319th41st19th70th3rd52nd26th126th336th21st88th
2014-1530th23rd--80th106th123rd171st223rd76th90th142nd20th33rd42nd166th254th106th146th