Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Charleston So. 18-16 (0.529) | Big South

All-Play Percentage: 0.543 (162^nd)	Schedule Strength: 0.450 (224^th)	Record Quality: -0.047 (195^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 210.58 (212^th)
Pace: 70.44 (79^th)	Momentum: 1.65 (98^th)	Off. Momentum: -1.63 (301^st)	Def. Momentum: 3.28 (17^th)
Consistency: -10.65 (292^nd)	Res. Consistency: -9.49 (25^th)	Away From Home: -0.41 (213^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -3.22 (331^st)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.27

20.42

67.51

85.82

42.55

35.58

35.00

23.46

37.99

26.79

56.57

14.40

11.51

4.15

41.46

27.33

31.21

2.10

RANK:

235^th

329^th

295^th

75^th

235^th

73^rd

145^th

93^rd

84^th

298^th

260^th

40^th

291^st

332^nd

96^th

110^th

314^th

307^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.90

26.62

80.57

43.15

31.34

34.80

19.61

32.24

29.62

59.20

14.23

12.91

6.04

38.90

24.34

36.76

2.02

RANK:

105^th

205^th

62^nd

121^st

147^th

182^nd

117^th

35^th

130^th

145^th

328^th

118^th

171^st

190^th

147^th

184^th

185^th

ANALYSIS:
Charleston So. is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Ranked 162nd overall (out of 353) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 18-16. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 11) in the Big South (average ranking 208.3).

Based on their performances this year, Charleston So. will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 100 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #105 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Charleston So. has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 35th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 32.2% of their attempts from that distance. Charleston So. also does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 40th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 14.40.

The offense for Charleston So., on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 235th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charleston So. does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 4.1% of all second-chance opportunities (332nd nationally). Charleston So. also does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.42 vs. AO, they are 329th in the overall rankings for that category. Charleston So. lastly has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.23, which ranks 328th in D1.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/6/2018	vs Columbia International	---	W 100-68	1-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/9/2018	@ Florida₂₉	L 56.21 - 71.70	L 46-76	1-1	87.74	49.77	▼ 37.97	105.78	97.06	▲ 8.72	▼ 29.25
Tue 11/13/2018	vs S. Carolina St.₃₃₃	W 79.54 - 62.45	W 89-72	2-1	111.41	111.79	▲ 0.38	91.64	101.13	▼ 9.49	▼ 9.11
Fri 11/16/2018	@ Mid Tennessee₂₅₃	W 69.38 - 66.85	L 73-76	2-2	101.26	98.55	▼ 2.71	91.76	96.21	▼ 4.45	▼ 7.16
Mon 11/19/2018	vs Trinity Baptist	---	W 98-49	3-2	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/23/2018	vs Coppin State₃₄₀ *	W 76.85 - 61.12	W 93-67	4-2	104.71	125.00	▲ 20.29	83.35	99.22	▼ 15.87	▲ 4.42
Tue 11/27/2018	@ Marquette₄₈	L 64.15 - 78.64	L 55-76	4-3	94.31	81.18	▼ 13.13	108.42	105.84	▲ 2.58	▼ 10.55
Sat 12/1/2018	vs North Florida₁₇₅	W 76.03 - 71.42	L 70-76	4-4	100.25	85.00	▼ 15.25	98.52	96.32	▲ 2.20	▼ 13.05
Tue 12/11/2018	@ Furman₇₈	L 63.10 - 73.22	L 69-77	4-5	93.50	96.36	▲ 2.86	102.34	109.10	▼ 6.76	▼ 3.90
Sat 12/15/2018	@ North Florida₁₇₅	L 72.47 - 74.99	L 61-68	4-6	100.25	75.55	▼ 24.70	98.52	77.27	▲ 21.25	▼ 3.45
Tue 12/18/2018	@ Clemson₃₉	L 58.27 - 73.13	L 51-78	4-7	87.19	77.07	▼ 10.12	102.02	108.98	▼ 6.96	▼ 17.08
Fri 12/21/2018	vs Johnson & Wales (NC)	---	W 86-61	5-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sun 12/30/2018	vs Piedmont International	---	W 111-65	6-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 1/5/2019	vs High Point₂₃₅	W 69.08 - 61.41	L 50-51	6-8	100.31	78.15	▼ 22.16	93.25	88.94	▲ 4.31	▼ 17.85
Thu 1/10/2019	@ Hampton₁₅₇	L 72.69 - 77.10	L 82-94	6-9	101.01	97.06	▼ 3.95	101.61	106.93	▼ 5.32	▼ 9.27
Sat 1/12/2019	@ Longwood₂₄₁	W 70.21 - 68.69	W 101-91	7-9	102.48	135.83	▲ 33.35	94.36	109.83	▼ 15.47	▲ 17.88
Sat 1/19/2019	vs Campbell₁₇₈	W 72.45 - 68.09	L 72-73	7-10	102.90	108.27	▲ 5.37	100.81	113.10	▼ 12.29	▼ 6.92
Thu 1/24/2019	@ Radford₁₂₉	L 65.36 - 71.85	L 78-86	7-11	99.07	123.46	▲ 24.39	103.53	138.49	▼ 34.96	▼ 10.57
Sat 1/26/2019	vs Gardner-Webb₁₇₁	W 73.93 - 69.70	W 74-60	8-11	102.40	94.38	▼ 8.02	101.53	75.51	▲ 26.02	▲ 18.00
Wed 1/30/2019	vs Presbyterian₁₆₉	W 75.30 - 71.26	W 85-84	9-11	104.04	132.42	▲ 28.38	102.69	131.73	▼ 29.04	▼ 0.66
Sat 2/2/2019	@ USC Upstate₃₃₁	W 74.41 - 64.11	W 90-71	10-11	107.31	131.07	▲ 23.76	88.02	89.57	▼ 1.55	▲ 22.21
Thu 2/7/2019	vs Winthrop₁₇₀	W 79.18 - 74.83	L 72-76	10-12	103.69	93.18	▼ 10.51	102.45	101.20	▲ 1.25	▼ 9.26
Sat 2/9/2019	@ UNC Asheville₃₄₈	W 72.66 - 58.84	W 85-75	11-12	111.85	127.78	▲ 15.93	86.20	106.73	▼ 20.53	▼ 4.60
Wed 2/13/2019	@ Gardner-Webb₁₇₁	L 70.53 - 73.18	L 74-77	11-13	102.40	110.92	▲ 8.52	101.53	107.11	▼ 5.58	▲ 2.94
Sat 2/16/2019	vs Radford₁₂₉	W 68.61 - 68.52	W 53-52	12-13	99.07	81.30	▼ 17.77	103.53	81.28	▲ 22.25	▲ 4.48
Thu 2/21/2019	vs USC Upstate₃₃₁	W 77.83 - 60.63	W 92-60	13-13	107.31	129.65	▲ 22.34	88.02	84.31	▲ 3.71	▲ 26.05
Sat 2/23/2019	@ Winthrop₁₇₀	L 75.59 - 78.55	L 78-80 (2OT)	13-14	103.69	99.64	▼ 4.05	102.45	94.65	▲ 7.80	▲ 3.75
Wed 2/27/2019	vs UNC Asheville₃₄₈	W 75.87 - 55.48	W 77-48	14-14	111.85	126.35	▲ 14.50	86.20	81.74	▲ 4.46	▲ 18.96
Sat 3/2/2019	@ Presbyterian₁₆₉	L 71.89 - 74.84	W 72-65	15-14	104.04	102.15	▼ 1.89	102.69	80.17	▲ 22.52	▲ 20.63
Tue 3/5/2019	vs USC Upstate₃₃₁	W 77.83 - 60.63	W 71-52	16-14	107.31	110.62	▲ 3.31	88.02	85.83	▲ 2.19	▲ 5.50
Thu 3/7/2019	vs Winthrop₁₇₀ *	W 77.38 - 76.69	W 77-63	17-14	103.69	102.70	▼ 0.99	102.45	86.30	▲ 16.15	▲ 15.16
Fri 3/8/2019	vs Radford₁₂₉ *	L 66.98 - 70.18	L 54-63	17-15	99.07	85.71	▼ 13.36	103.53	103.28	▲ 0.25	▼ 13.11
Thu 3/21/2019	vs FAU₁₆₅	W 68.44 - 64.47	W 68-66	18-15	94.58	99.00	▲ 4.42	93.44	100.64	▼ 7.20	▼ 2.78
Tue 3/26/2019	@ Hampton₁₅₇	L 72.69 - 77.10	L 67-73	18-16	101.01	84.96	▼ 16.05	101.61	87.91	▲ 13.70	▼ 2.35
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Charleston So. does worse vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.94, Charleston So. performs above average 19% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 89% of the time.
	Charleston So. performs better against squads that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 105.03, Charleston So. is more efficient than normal 69% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 7% of the time.
	When playing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, Charleston So. usually performs better than average. Charleston So. is more efficient than normal 69% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.39%. In all other contests, Charleston So. performs better than average 7% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Buccaneers hold off late Florida Atlantic charge in CIT First Round win (3/22/2019 4:34:00 AM) CHARLESTON, S.C. - Charleston Southern held off a second-half Florida Atlantic charge as the Buccaneers topped the visiting Owls in the CollegeInsider.com Tournament on Thursday night in the Buc Dome, 68-66. Christian Keeling appeared to put the game away ...
	What led to Winthrop's first tournament-opening loss since 2011-12 season? (3/7/2019 10:27:00 PM) Seventeen giveaways helped Charleston Southern keep the Eagles at bay in the second half of a 77-63 win, and the Bucs advanced to Friday's semifinal against Radford. Winthrop, meanwhile, headed for a rare early exit. "Not used to going home after Game 1 ...
	Charleston Southern upsets Winthrop at Big South Tournament (3/7/2019 9:21:00 PM) Third-seeded Winthrop and sixth-seeded Charleston Southern tested that theory on Thursday ... the Buccaneers got the better of the third contest, winning 77-63 to advance to the semifinals on Friday against Radford. CSU (17-14) led from start to finish ...
	Bucs lead from start to finish; Knock off No. 3 Winthrop in Big South Championships quarterfinal round (3/7/2019 9:11:00 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. - No. 6 Charleston Southern never trailed as the Buccaneers topped No. 3 Winthrop in the quarterfinal round of the Big South Men's Basketball Championships, 77-63. The Bucs (17-14) led at the halftime break, 38-32, and went up by as many ...
	Efianayi leads Gardner-Webb past Charleston Southern 77-74 (2/13/2019 11:14:00 PM) Charleston Southern rallied early in the second half and Christian Keeling added two 3-pointers to the spurt that took the Buccaneers (11-13, 5-6) into a 60-57 lead with 10:24 to play. A Johnson 3-pointer got the Bulldogs back on top for good, 63-60 ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	315	0.135	10-22 (0.313)	0.313	-0.258	Big South	67.12	-9.14	0.433	0.65	0.18	291.45
2023-24	318	0.122	10-20 (0.333)	0.333	-0.260	Big South	67.61	-9.05	0.427	0.19	0.55	322.42
2022-23	307	0.157	10-21 (0.323)	0.323	-0.274	Big South	66.74	-9.89	0.356	-2.54	-1.09	297.40
2021-22	341	0.048	6-25 (0.194)	0.194	-0.490	Big South	69.18	-8.87	0.351	-0.60	-0.92	337.55
2020-21	330	0.076	3-18 (0.143)	0.143	-0.505	Big South	71.63	-9.13	0.412	1.33	1.77	310.07
2019-20	316	0.105	14-18 (0.438)	0.438	-0.257	Big South	68.79	-11.16	0.310	-2.35	1.58	312.84
2018-19	162	0.543	18-16 (0.529)	0.529	-0.047	Big South	70.44	-10.65	0.450	-3.22	-0.41	210.58
2017-18	251	0.286	15-16 (0.484)	0.484	-0.186	Big South	68.66	-9.84	0.369	-2.00	-1.12	289.55
2016-17	306	0.129	12-19 (0.387)	0.387	-0.258	Big South	70.56	-8.44	0.374	-0.13	1.25	297.08
2015-16	299	0.149	9-21 (0.300)	0.300	-0.321	Big South	69.50	-7.52	0.447	-0.35	0.55	290.80
2014-15	202	0.426	19-12 (0.613)	0.613	0.029	Big South	66.84	-10.64	0.414	-1.46	-0.49	232.26

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	98.85	31.88	66.89	81.86	41.05	33.85	30.49	16.60	38.93	31.41	53.56	7.95	13.01	4.59	41.35	20.28	38.37	2.03
2023-24	93.51	22.06	72.86	86.00	39.29	31.10	31.71	31.25	39.01	23.66	49.63	6.80	11.55	4.24	36.16	36.34	27.51	2.09
2022-23	100.75	22.28	71.57	87.72	42.24	32.38	33.02	28.54	42.11	26.79	53.54	10.60	16.61	7.14	36.92	32.54	30.54	2.06
2021-22	91.03	20.80	67.75	83.85	39.12	35.80	31.66	22.18	35.53	25.87	52.54	10.81	15.66	6.30	42.70	26.45	30.85	2.12
2020-21	88.34	22.11	71.68	79.14	39.15	33.49	31.42	22.99	33.28	22.66	56.53	10.57	11.20	3.14	42.32	29.06	28.63	2.14
2019-20	91.62	17.61	76.13	83.89	39.96	35.47	31.48	28.65	35.82	19.77	61.17	8.29	6.93	2.51	42.28	34.15	23.57	2.19
2018-19	99.27	20.42	67.51	85.82	42.55	35.58	35.00	23.46	37.99	26.79	56.57	14.40	11.51	4.15	41.46	27.33	31.21	2.10
2017-18	96.34	24.08	73.38	83.31	41.58	28.53	32.92	29.10	35.37	25.68	58.23	13.18	12.10	5.37	34.25	34.93	30.82	2.03
2016-17	97.78	27.99	67.54	82.46	42.23	28.30	32.59	30.57	38.76	23.59	58.31	9.54	11.67	5.27	34.32	37.07	28.61	2.06
2015-16	95.39	21.28	62.15	84.40	41.64	35.26	33.68	25.21	35.59	23.94	59.74	8.61	12.40	5.42	41.77	29.86	28.36	2.13
2014-15	99.95	27.45	70.13	84.58	40.28	37.26	33.72	23.25	35.31	24.06	55.25	11.35	14.22	5.51	44.06	27.49	28.45	2.16

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	113.06	27.07	--	89.31	47.55	27.27	32.53	27.30	46.32	34.74	60.32	15.00	11.53	5.56	30.53	30.57	38.90	1.92
2023-24	107.30	26.08	--	89.05	44.78	29.29	30.75	27.77	45.18	32.00	57.27	13.30	12.97	5.26	32.89	31.18	35.93	1.97
2022-23	112.88	28.14	--	85.99	46.46	35.11	36.04	21.83	41.57	29.05	62.72	11.32	14.97	6.09	40.83	25.39	33.78	2.07
2021-22	110.90	25.19	--	83.52	47.97	32.06	35.85	21.79	40.34	29.67	66.66	10.92	12.73	5.95	38.39	26.09	35.52	2.03
2020-21	104.60	28.55	--	85.29	44.06	32.30	33.31	24.14	33.70	28.85	64.78	16.42	16.22	5.78	37.87	28.30	33.83	2.04
2019-20	105.60	22.81	--	83.80	46.99	30.85	34.49	23.72	41.14	29.23	64.94	13.06	15.04	6.98	36.82	28.30	34.88	2.02
2018-19	99.90	26.62	--	80.57	43.15	31.34	34.80	19.61	32.24	29.62	59.20	14.23	12.91	6.04	38.90	24.34	36.76	2.02
2017-18	106.14	27.36	--	78.38	46.38	33.30	38.73	18.73	40.78	26.34	60.04	11.38	14.64	7.60	42.49	23.90	33.61	2.09
2016-17	113.86	33.01	--	81.57	47.79	31.24	37.63	23.69	40.63	26.63	66.08	10.01	14.71	7.75	38.30	29.05	32.65	2.06
2015-16	110.29	29.89	--	82.31	46.76	31.77	37.45	24.60	36.41	25.94	67.96	10.95	14.64	6.62	38.59	29.89	31.52	2.07
2014-15	105.83	27.21	--	82.62	44.89	32.59	36.65	26.95	38.53	23.08	63.96	11.67	15.86	8.37	39.45	32.62	27.93	2.12

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	315^th	315	315^th	315	319^th	319	310^th	310	Big South	Big South	147^th	147	135^th	135	174^th	174	46^th	46	125^th	125	296^th	296
2023-24	318^th	318	318^th	318	309^th	309	309^th	309	Big South	Big South	189^th	189	162^nd	162	181^st	181	79^th	79	111^th	111	328^th	328
2022-23	307^th	307	306^th	306	313^th	313	318^th	318	Big South	Big South	247^th	247	265^th	265	271^st	271	302^nd	302	237^th	237	303^rd	303
2021-22	341^st	341	341^st	341	344^th	344	352^nd	352	Big South	Big South	90^th	90	138^th	138	261^st	261	147^th	147	281^st	281	342^nd	342
2020-21	330^th	330	330^th	330	340^th	340	350^th	350	Big South	Big South	85^th	85	162^nd	162	232^nd	232	39^th	39	41^st	41	314^th	314
2019-20	316^th	316	316^th	316	242^nd	242	300^th	300	Big South	Big South	226^th	226	346^th	346	335^th	335	289^th	289	31^st	31	323^rd	323
2018-19	162^nd	162	162^nd	162	156^th	156	195^th	195	Big South	Big South	79^th	79	292^nd	292	224^th	224	331^st	331	213^th	213	212^th	212
2017-18	251^st	251	251^st	251	201^st	201	269^th	269	Big South	Big South	262^nd	262	268^th	268	299^th	299	274^th	274	251^st	251	293^rd	293
2016-17	306^th	306	306^th	306	264^th	264	297^th	297	Big South	Big South	159^th	159	115^th	115	302^nd	302	112^th	112	44^th	44	298^th	298
2015-16	299^th	299	299^th	299	300^th	300	310^th	310	Big South	Big South	187^th	187	23^rd	23	219^th	219	127^th	127	111^th	111	296^th	296
2014-15	202^nd	202	202^nd	202	103^rd	103	160^th	160	Big South	Big South	104^th	104	309^th	309	258^th	258	226^th	226	220^th	220	230^th	230

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	320^th	320	40^th	40	331^st	331	358^th	358	311^th	311	179^th	179	334^th	334	305^th	305	121^st	121	203^rd	203	334^th	334	351^st	351	255^th	255	313^th	313	110^th	110	290^th	290	126^th	126	197^th	197
2023-24	340^th	340	329^th	329	147^th	147	152^nd	152	349^th	349	197^th	197	304^th	304	16^th	16	188^th	188	357^th	357	355^th	355	356^th	356	265^th	265	298^th	298	207^th	207	16^th	16	354^th	354	309^th	309
2022-23	214^th	214	312^th	312	187^th	187	43^rd	43	262^nd	262	131^st	131	234^th	234	49^th	49	32^nd	32	292^nd	292	324^th	324	182^nd	182	52^nd	52	25^th	25	179^th	179	69^th	69	322^nd	322	271^st	271
2021-22	331^st	331	329^th	329	303^rd	303	214^th	214	342^nd	342	45^th	45	261^st	261	262^nd	262	280^th	280	300^th	300	334^th	334	172^nd	172	60^th	60	51^st	51	39^th	39	260^th	260	304^th	304	327^th	327
2020-21	337^th	337	286^th	286	165^th	165	287^th	287	340^th	340	87^th	87	285^th	285	185^th	185	322^nd	322	341^st	341	239^th	239	193^rd	193	257^th	257	331^st	331	60^th	60	154^th	154	333^rd	333	327^th	327
2019-20	300^th	300	352^nd	352	32^nd	32	75^th	75	318^th	318	45^th	45	277^th	277	36^th	36	225^th	225	348^th	348	112^th	112	314^th	314	352^nd	352	353^rd	353	61^st	61	44^th	44	351^st	351	346^th	346
2018-19	235^th	235	329^th	329	295^th	295	75^th	75	235^th	235	73^rd	73	145^th	145	93^rd	93	84^th	84	298^th	298	260^th	260	40^th	40	291^st	291	332^nd	332	96^th	96	110^th	110	314^th	314	307^th	307
2017-18	264^th	264	250^th	250	112^th	112	104^th	104	292^nd	292	248^th	248	291^st	291	28^th	28	252^nd	252	285^th	285	216^th	216	48^th	48	286^th	286	280^th	280	260^th	260	28^th	28	290^th	290	185^th	185
2016-17	227^th	227	145^th	145	275^th	275	132^nd	132	251^st	251	220^th	220	288^th	288	23^rd	23	71^st	71	328^th	328	211^th	211	249^th	249	306^th	306	299^th	299	226^th	226	24^th	24	330^th	330	248^th	248
2015-16	276^th	276	349^th	349	343^rd	343	73^rd	73	262^nd	262	23^rd	23	239^th	239	131^st	131	163^rd	163	337^th	337	147^th	147	298^th	298	292^nd	292	296^th	296	35^th	35	161^st	161	341^st	341	339^th	339
2014-15	173^rd	173	227^th	227	149^th	149	64^th	64	289^th	289	8^th	8	205^th	205	248^th	248	175^th	175	325^th	325	252^nd	252	170^th	170	224^th	224	286^th	286	11^th	11	276^th	276	336^th	336	347^th	347

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	276^th	276	174^th	174	--	--	280^th	280	330^th	330	5^th	5	85^th	85	351^st	351	359^th	359	302^nd	302	235^th	235	337^th	337	16^th	16	122^nd	122	1^st	1	349^th	349	272^nd	272	351^st	351
2023-24	222^nd	222	177^th	177	--	--	324^th	324	210^th	210	79^th	79	20^th	20	337^th	337	350^th	350	242^nd	242	157^th	157	307^th	307	149^th	149	148^th	148	44^th	44	315^th	315	172^nd	172	266^th	266
2022-23	353^rd	353	298^th	298	--	--	238^th	238	316^th	316	328^th	328	284^th	284	98^th	98	325^th	325	158^th	158	306^th	306	226^th	226	268^th	268	286^th	286	316^th	316	65^th	65	129^th	129	65^th	65
2021-22	337^th	337	208^th	208	--	--	134^th	134	345^th	345	244^th	244	307^th	307	59^th	59	288^th	288	216^th	216	352^nd	352	188^th	188	138^th	138	290^th	290	250^th	250	69^th	69	229^th	229	166^th	166
2020-21	281^st	281	308^th	308	--	--	313^th	313	184^th	184	256^th	256	143^rd	143	228^th	228	35^th	35	202^nd	202	328^th	328	355^th	355	342^nd	342	275^th	275	205^th	205	190^th	190	156^th	156	153^rd	153
2019-20	303^rd	303	78^th	78	--	--	259^th	259	319^th	319	187^th	187	234^th	234	227^th	227	315^th	315	219^th	219	324^th	324	312^th	312	306^th	306	333^rd	333	148^th	148	213^th	213	176^th	176	198^th	198
2018-19	105^th	105	205^th	205	--	--	62^nd	62	121^st	121	147^th	147	182^nd	182	117^th	117	35^th	35	130^th	130	145^th	145	328^th	328	118^th	118	171^st	171	190^th	190	147^th	147	184^th	184	185^th	185
2017-18	241^st	241	217^th	217	--	--	36^th	36	255^th	255	290^th	290	323^rd	323	39^th	39	310^th	310	89^th	89	165^th	165	222^nd	222	175^th	175	251^st	251	324^th	324	52^nd	52	127^th	127	69^th	69
2016-17	340^th	340	333^rd	333	--	--	162^nd	162	316^th	316	258^th	258	288^th	288	173^rd	173	325^th	325	104^th	104	319^th	319	112^th	112	194^th	194	268^th	268	262^nd	262	185^th	185	104^th	104	79^th	79
2015-16	313^th	313	213^th	213	--	--	182^nd	182	295^th	295	298^th	298	296^th	296	210^th	210	191^st	191	61^st	61	344^th	344	184^th	184	157^th	157	152^nd	152	290^th	290	205^th	205	56^th	56	45^th	45
2014-15	268^th	268	107^th	107	--	--	193^rd	193	234^th	234	325^th	325	279^th	279	243^rd	243	290^th	290	14^th	14	310^th	310	193^rd	193	224^th	224	305^th	305	326^th	326	235^th	235	13^th	13	9^th	9