TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Tulsa  13-20 (0.394)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.303 (255th)
Schedule Strength: 0.446 (163rd)
Record Quality: -0.128 (243rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 254.17 (254th)
Pace: 65.98 (225th)
Momentum: 0.33 (165th)
Off. Momentum: 1.73 (90th)
Def. Momentum: -1.41 (246th)
Consistency: -10.37 (293rd)
Res. Consistency: -13.58 (250th)
Away From Home: 0.40 (99th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.12 (329th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.60 26.93 68.86 85.00 43.10 33.84 31.88 20.56 37.27 30.60 59.41 11.35 13.50 5.26 39.81 24.19 36.00 2.04
RANK: 259th 189th 296th 282nd 213th 179th 289th 215th 182nd 229th 151st 231st 232nd 254th 147th 198th 194th 220th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.31 26.81 -- 90.61 44.12 34.92 33.47 22.38 37.70 33.31 59.60 13.86 17.10 8.33 38.54 24.70 36.76 2.02
RANK: 223rd 161st -- 324th 179th 244th 134th 228th 196th 245th 207th 300th 335th 356th 177th 196th 183rd 180th

ANALYSIS:
If you see Tulsa on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. Their record this season is 13-20, and the club is ranked 255th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #12 team (out of 13) in the AAC (average ranking 159.4).

Offensively, Tulsa finds itself in the lower half of the rankings. The team is rated 259th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tulsa isn't the greatest at protecting the ball on offense and, as a result, opponents tend to score more quick points off of steals than they normally would. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.86, which ranks 300th in D1.

Tulsa doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #223 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Tulsa is one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 8.3% of all second-chance opportunities (ninth from the bottom nationally), and with a rating of 17.10, they're 335th in potential points surrendered off of the offensive boards as well. Tulsa also struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 324th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 90.61 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, Tulsa usually performs better than average. Tulsa is more efficient than normal 80% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.18%. In all other contests, Tulsa performs better than average 9% of the time.
Tulsa is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 28.76, Tulsa performs above their norm 31% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 80% of the time.
When facing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, Tulsa often performs better than normal. Tulsa is more efficient than usual 83% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.34%. In their other contests, Tulsa performs better than the norm 37% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25255th255th281st243rdAAC225th293rd163rd329th99th254th
2023-24209th209th181st166thAAC50th79th167th231st353rd204th
2022-23335th335th354th301stAAC191st88th97th338th250th259th
2021-22157th157th285th218thAAC189th78th107th70th307th147th
2020-21132nd132nd200th149thAAC287th79th97th181st315th111th
2019-2073rd73rd54th51stAAC287th170th91st137th318th95th
2018-19112th111th135th101stAAC104th186th80th55th305th121st
2017-18113th113th104th108thAAC193rd225th132nd93rd290th118th
2016-17157th157th207th144thAAC209th78th77th211th325th153rd
2015-1669th68th98th68thAAC150th325th73rd189th304th57th
2014-15106th106th60th61stAAC188th301st118th302nd246th96th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25259th189th296th282nd213th179th289th215th182nd229th151st231st232nd254th147th198th194th220th
2023-24226th54th119th358th178th206th257th287th180th238th122nd35th325th252nd121st252nd149th201st
2022-23317th341st356th180th278th80th316th245th140th229th222nd252nd289th235th79th253rd224th275th
2021-22145th132nd151st249th107th246th94th183rd70th140th207th95th315th209th236th172nd111th102nd
2020-21159th153rd254th169th133rd183rd267th238th247th77th66th222nd92nd50th189th247th79th116th
2019-20149th37th173rd272nd113th294th178th192nd273rd81st110th94th89th110th282nd173rd67th56th
2018-19139th21st200th311th82nd281st136th192nd200th168th50th293rd216th122nd241st161st114th100th
2017-18112th17th110th294th151st154th132nd225th300th229th72nd321st154th142nd121st202nd195th219th
2016-17152nd14th86th349th136th218th178th277th326th214th70th336th241st247th152nd234th118th175th
2015-1676th33rd263rd191st51st201st208th264th101st41st67th103rd249th185th202nd267th35th74th
2014-15203rd53rd288th178th221st251st278th240th308th30th192nd244th228th290th253rd239th30th44th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25223rd161st--324th179th244th134th228th196th245th207th300th335th356th177th196th183rd180th
2023-24189th251st--171st181st213th209th96th50th261st225th284th252nd289th216th88th256th211th
2022-23333rd70th--348th321st329th79th72nd341st316th347th288th265th316th286th27th261st162nd
2021-22189th147th--146th167th348th271st122nd115th21st268th255th70th188th349th127th21st7th
2020-2198th242nd--49th114th315th138th60th176th31st200th152nd168th148th341st88th55th24th
2019-2030th23rd--90th51st349th61st144th269th3rd153rd106th18th23rd350th177th4th2nd
2018-1996th85th--238th47th349th97th196th166th23rd84th220th184th80th345th171st13th6th
2017-18116th7th--318th80th349th160th256th144th19th161st175th114th53rd343rd232nd8th3rd
2016-17174th169th--132nd129th318th255th200th140th22nd169th334th39th48th323rd213th27th15th
2015-16101st99th--141st69th284th219th249th97th21st87th7th206th206th292nd258th18th27th
2014-1528th50th--203rd29th295th123rd301st130th17th16th112th155th6th293rd303rd14th19th