TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Cent. Conn. St.  25-7 (0.781)  |  Northeast
All-Play Percentage: 0.452 (199th)
Schedule Strength: 0.177 (364th)
Record Quality: 0.101 (123rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 212.56 (214th)
Pace: 65.65 (255th)
Momentum: -2.15 (275th)
Off. Momentum: -1.69 (293rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.46 (191st)
Consistency: -8.69 (73rd)
Res. Consistency: -12.00 (141st)
Away From Home: 1.40 (21st)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.21 (70th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.68 20.13 73.20 87.46 43.77 31.51 32.97 24.18 39.62 31.77 57.63 13.74 11.21 4.84 36.03 27.65 36.32 2.00
RANK: 273rd 359th 143rd 168th 178th 251st 235th 106th 89th 184th 212th 92nd 328th 292nd 252nd 108th 182nd 131st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.13 20.59 -- 91.26 43.15 36.35 30.74 20.27 41.32 34.64 57.25 11.23 15.40 6.33 39.83 22.22 37.95 2.02
RANK: 94th 7th -- 336th 124th 294th 26th 135th 316th 297th 115th 115th 244th 222nd 245th 81st 231st 175th

ANALYSIS:
Regardless of what the win percentage says, Cent. Conn. St. isn't a very good team this year. Their record this season is 25-7, and the club is ranked 199th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of nine) in the NEC (average ranking 309.2). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.177 (which ranks last in the nation), Cent. Conn. St. has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

Cent. Conn. St. has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #94 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 104 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cent. Conn. St. is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.59 vs. AO, they are currently rated seventh in the country in that category. Cent. Conn. St. has also done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 26th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 30.7% of their attempts from afar. If Cent. Conn. St. does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 91.26 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 29th-worst in college basketball.

Unfortunately, Cent. Conn. St. is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 273rd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cent. Conn. St. does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.13 vs. AO, they are sixth from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. Cent. Conn. St. also does a fairly poor job cleaning the offensive glass. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 11.21 in potential points scored off of second chances (328th nationally).

When playing on the road, Cent. Conn. St. has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 21st in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, Cent. Conn. St. often performs better than normal. Cent. Conn. St. is more efficient than usual 65% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.68%. In their other contests, Cent. Conn. St. performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25199th199th19th123rdNEC255th73rd364th70th21st214th
2023-24279th279th81st203rdNEC222nd59th362nd330th18th295th
2022-23333rd333rd319th338thNEC315th307th358th216th270th338th
2021-22352nd352nd330th338thNEC301st124th327th197th186th352nd
2020-21333rd333rd315th343rdNEC39th219th301st79th111th331st
2019-20347th347th349th348thNEC117th61st279th207th136th350th
2018-19336th335th282nd327thNEC123rd242nd315th66th23rd311th
2017-18315th315th230th277thNEC314th77th330th170th67th303rd
2016-17339th339th339th343rdNEC305th286th333rd234th111th337th
2015-16350th350th350th351stNEC192nd249th342nd252nd258th351st
2014-15342nd342nd343rd346thNEC264th242nd332nd215th201st340th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25273rd359th143rd168th178th251st235th106th89th184th212th92nd328th292nd252nd108th182nd131st
2023-24278th207th250th262nd260th231st286th177th307th177th158th181st242nd225th216th161st152nd146th
2022-23309th338th260th88th326th177th257th88th276th220th323rd337th210th277th224th111th249th203rd
2021-22353rd253rd272nd308th356th116th203rd200th355th325th351st256th340th352nd83rd162nd314th316th
2020-21324th310th210th272nd302nd143rd268th227th304th245th255th143rd350th304th118th204th208th242nd
2019-20346th310th261st279th341st291st79th70th326th275th348th181st329th287th278th52nd250th139th
2018-19320th244th13th123rd345th242nd322nd104th287th133rd350th261st138th323rd252nd108th151st108th
2017-18308th262nd259th313th222nd238th294th216th280th171st163rd318th252nd178th186th179th126th132nd
2016-17333rd262nd347th184th317th332nd205th177th342nd16th336th293rd21st126th327th175th14th10th
2015-16338th335th238th176th331st287th178th54th317th204th346th338th93rd127th290th52nd212th105th
2014-15329th349th109th71st320th275th262nd41st233rd146th341st325th123rd160th292nd50th190th95th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2594th7th--336th124th294th26th135th316th297th115th115th244th222nd245th81st231st175th
2023-24240th128th--290th249th119th326th163rd129th333rd174th134th353rd356th81st132nd318th316th
2022-23349th145th--336th312th204th308th269th278th266th261st296th168th285th129th224th198th220th
2021-22305th125th--229th333rd239th309th28th271st317th315th241st164th330th216th15th322nd251st
2020-21315th171st--159th345th191st282nd75th320th259th333rd157th133rd72nd203rd68th271st227th
2019-20342nd286th--307th322nd204th350th56th72nd341st265th269th300th315th141st22nd337th305th
2018-19346th269th--168th328th321st336th17th178th184th323rd276th50th120th328th19th185th89th
2017-18291st129th--280th254th283rd328th121st198th243rd177th334th208th199th247th92nd203rd146th
2016-17328th240th--184th335th209th333rd77th319th272nd279th330th227th292nd198th62nd272nd227th
2015-16351st120th--341st343rd133rd286th88th335th350th276th315th336th344th54th31st342nd335th
2014-15335th12th--350th320th275th274th95th295th347th255th337th303rd334th155th28th320th286th