TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Cent. Conn. St.  14-18 (0.438)  |  Northeast
All-Play Percentage: 0.100 (315th)
Schedule Strength: 0.317 (330th)
Record Quality: -0.210 (277th)
Avg. Season Rank: 296.89 (303rd)
Pace: 67.45 (314th)
Momentum: -0.62 (192nd)
Off. Momentum: -1.59 (293rd)
Def. Momentum: 0.97 (92nd)
Consistency: -8.20 (77th)
Res. Consistency: -12.70 (243rd)
Away From Home: 0.65 (67th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.82 (170th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.85 23.78 69.65 78.68 43.12 28.77 32.80 21.46 34.52 28.45 60.04 8.05 12.84 6.51 36.57 27.28 36.16 2.00
RANK: 308th 262nd 259th 313th 222nd 238th 294th 216th 280th 171st 163rd 318th 252nd 178th 186th 179th 126th 132nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.97 25.20 -- 84.65 46.37 33.01 38.96 21.20 37.73 30.43 60.43 13.62 14.99 7.01 39.00 25.05 35.95 2.03
RANK: 291st 129th -- 280th 254th 283rd 328th 121st 198th 243rd 177th 334th 208th 199th 247th 92nd 203rd 146th

ANALYSIS:
Cent. Conn. St. is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. They have a record of 14-18 and are ranked 315th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 10) in the NEC (average ranking 278.1). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.317 (which ranks 330th in the nation), Cent. Conn. St. has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to Cent. Conn. St.. The team is ranked 308th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 94 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Cent. Conn. St. tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.62, which ranks 334th in D1. Cent. Conn. St. is also one of the more inferior teams in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score on offense. The team is nationally ranked 313th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 78.68 vs. AO.

Cent. Conn. St. doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #291 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Cent. Conn. St. does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank 328th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 39.0% of their attempts from afar. Cent. Conn. St. also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #318 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.05 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Cent. Conn. St. does better vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.64%, Cent. Conn. St. performs above average 82% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
Cent. Conn. St. performs worse against squads that tend to get off more shots. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.37, Cent. Conn. St. is more efficient than normal 38% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 91% of the time.
When playing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Cent. Conn. St. usually performs better than average. Cent. Conn. St. is more efficient than normal 71% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 22.82. In all other contests, Cent. Conn. St. performs better than average 27% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25199th199th19th123rdNEC254th76th364th72nd22nd216th
2023-24279th279th81st203rdNEC222nd59th362nd330th18th295th
2022-23333rd333rd319th338thNEC315th307th358th216th270th338th
2021-22352nd352nd330th338thNEC301st124th327th197th186th352nd
2020-21333rd333rd315th343rdNEC39th219th301st79th111th331st
2019-20347th347th349th348thNEC117th61st279th207th136th350th
2018-19336th335th282nd327thNEC123rd242nd315th66th23rd311th
2017-18315th315th230th277thNEC314th77th330th170th67th303rd
2016-17339th339th339th343rdNEC305th286th333rd234th111th337th
2015-16350th350th350th351stNEC192nd249th342nd252nd258th351st
2014-15342nd342nd343rd346thNEC264th242nd332nd215th201st340th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25273rd359th143rd167th177th251st237th108th92nd184th209th93rd328th292nd252nd108th182nd130th
2023-24278th207th250th262nd260th231st286th177th307th177th158th181st242nd225th216th161st152nd146th
2022-23309th338th260th88th326th177th257th88th276th220th323rd337th210th277th224th111th249th203rd
2021-22353rd253rd272nd308th356th116th203rd200th355th325th351st256th340th352nd83rd162nd314th316th
2020-21324th310th210th272nd302nd143rd268th227th304th245th255th143rd350th304th118th204th208th242nd
2019-20346th310th261st279th341st291st79th70th326th275th348th181st329th287th278th52nd250th139th
2018-19320th244th13th123rd345th242nd322nd104th287th133rd350th261st138th323rd252nd108th151st108th
2017-18308th262nd259th313th222nd238th294th216th280th171st163rd318th252nd178th186th179th126th132nd
2016-17333rd262nd347th184th317th332nd205th177th342nd16th336th293rd21st126th327th175th14th10th
2015-16338th335th238th176th331st287th178th54th317th204th346th338th93rd127th290th52nd212th105th
2014-15329th349th109th71st320th275th262nd41st233rd146th341st325th123rd160th292nd50th190th95th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2593rd7th--337th123rd294th28th135th316th296th115th115th244th222nd243rd83rd231st176th
2023-24240th128th--290th249th119th326th163rd129th333rd174th134th353rd356th81st132nd318th316th
2022-23349th145th--336th312th204th308th269th278th266th261st296th168th285th129th224th198th220th
2021-22305th125th--229th333rd239th309th28th271st317th315th241st164th330th216th15th322nd251st
2020-21315th171st--159th345th191st282nd75th320th259th333rd157th133rd72nd203rd68th271st227th
2019-20342nd286th--307th322nd204th350th56th72nd341st265th269th300th315th141st22nd337th305th
2018-19346th269th--168th328th321st336th17th178th184th323rd276th50th120th328th19th185th89th
2017-18291st129th--280th254th283rd328th121st198th243rd177th334th208th199th247th92nd203rd146th
2016-17328th240th--184th335th209th333rd77th319th272nd279th330th227th292nd198th62nd272nd227th
2015-16351st120th--341st343rd133rd286th88th335th350th276th315th336th344th54th31st342nd335th
2014-15335th12th--350th320th275th274th95th295th347th255th337th303rd334th155th28th320th286th