TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Campbell  14-18 (0.438)  |  CAA
All-Play Percentage: 0.114 (320th)
Schedule Strength: 0.333 (286th)
Record Quality: -0.200 (285th)
Avg. Season Rank: 305.24 (313th)
Pace: 67.38 (217th)
Momentum: -2.84 (295th)
Off. Momentum: 0.60 (160th)
Def. Momentum: -3.44 (332nd)
Consistency: -10.27 (296th)
Res. Consistency: -14.14 (298th)
Away From Home: -0.46 (220th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.03 (97th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.19 24.54 71.95 80.49 44.08 30.77 34.32 17.26 36.43 32.46 57.41 11.26 9.15 3.46 38.23 21.44 40.33 1.98
RANK: 279th 253rd 186th 349th 177th 215th 176th 334th 282nd 114th 188th 190th 353rd 344th 133rd 316th 57th 122nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 113.46 20.08 -- 90.76 46.85 38.60 36.82 20.00 44.40 32.15 60.41 13.67 13.95 6.28 42.54 22.03 35.43 2.07
RANK: 338th 11th -- 353rd 311th 355th 319th 59th 344th 245th 280th 323rd 226th 282nd 342nd 20th 153rd 56th

ANALYSIS:
Campbell presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They have a record of 14-18 and are ranked 320th overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #12 team (out of 14) in the CAA (average ranking 215.7).

Campbell has one of the most inept defenses in the NCAA. Allowing about 113 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they're ranked way down at #338 in defensive efficiency. Campbell allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked tenth from the bottom in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 90.76 vs. AO. Campbell also performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked 344th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 44.4% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Thankfully, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots vs. Campbell as they typically would, as only 22.0% of their field goal attempts will come from in-between locations. If Campbell does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.08 vs. AO, which ranks 11th-best in the country.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Campbell still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #279 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Campbell poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.15 in potential points scored off of second chances (tenth from the bottom nationally), and they convert just 3.5% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 344th) as well. Campbell also happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 349th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 80.49 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Campbell does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.50%, Campbell performs above average 17% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 77% of the time.
Campbell performs worse against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.47, Campbell is more efficient than normal 17% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 77% of the time.
When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, Campbell usually performs better than average. Campbell is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.87. In all other contests, Campbell performs better than average 35% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25243rd243rd218th262ndCAA282nd360th284th339th230th249th
2023-24320th320th249th285thCAA217th296th286th97th220th313th
2022-23205th205th219th248thBig South332nd232nd270th60th20th233rd
2021-22218th218th159th236thBig South343rd59th324th77th64th183rd
2020-21173rd173rd99th162ndBig South348th262nd261st233rd122nd223rd
2019-20261st260th217th286thBig South309th279th347th64th124th230th
2018-19178th176th101st151stBig South257th38th242nd156th218th200th
2017-18210th210th169th248thBig South211th251st327th53rd282nd213th
2016-17273rd272nd177th236thBig South297th274th326th268th8th295th
2015-16312th312th247th306thBig South196th330th333rd211th12th308th
2014-15291st290th304th322ndBig South331st292nd290th179th243rd289th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25267th332nd58th226th230th166th291st246th260th152nd178th146th334th358th149th241st140th175th
2023-24279th253rd186th349th177th215th176th334th282nd114th188th190th353rd344th133rd316th57th122nd
2022-23151st91st246th310th83rd235th204th337th235th37th104th254th250th211th192nd330th16th65th
2021-22224th337th308th96th169th156th186th177th259th143rd119th171st288th323rd177th197th161st174th
2020-21135th250th270th310th28th264th11th112th44th287th65th280th354th288th225th87th250th189th
2019-20265th345th147th186th215th151st165th185th285th208th166th130th342nd339th137th191st205th223rd
2018-19143rd268th26th106th202nd22nd193rd250th28th241st226th162nd223rd305th31st262nd264th316th
2017-18138th228th30th234th159th71st55th269th226th238th214th61st344th326th60th268th222nd281st
2016-17260th290th45th269th256th119th185th226th169th248th291st256th344th330th98th214th219th245th
2015-16277th175th158th256th284th101st302nd278th251st174th253rd220th338th335th85th277th153rd239th
2014-15281st229th347th285th264th20th113th338th346th240th233rd241st306th312th17th336th196th325th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25190th72nd--202nd296th113th104th141st215th310th333rd168th149th236th102nd134th305th301st
2023-24338th11th--353rd311th355th319th59th344th245th280th323rd226th282nd342nd20th153rd56th
2022-23261st197th--193rd241st331st217th28th114th197th323rd229th237th192nd328th20th190th81st
2021-22171st94th--137th243rd193rd298th270th214th60th299th208th69th165th208th287th71st89th
2020-21248th56th--247th305th218th62nd171st341st212th321st142nd170th346th192nd158th197th176th
2019-20241st313th--91st282nd28th127th245th181st218th313th250th214th293rd41st265th239th302nd
2018-19251st247th--43rd301st208th256th115th320th75th318th95th113th291st272nd148th114th94th
2017-18280th193rd--170th305th165th230th190th314th182nd310th131st79th154th158th197th180th175th
2016-17280th312th--183rd228th176th136th124th147th251st265th320th296th296th160th111th251st232nd
2015-16319th285th--101st344th34th343rd97th214th308th323rd244th196th311th53rd111th319th321st
2014-15294th320th--75th302nd84th193rd111th256th232nd297th338th229th229th114th141st271st268th