TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Campbell  12-18 (0.400)  |  Big South
All-Play Percentage: 0.111 (312th)
Schedule Strength: 0.325 (333rd)
Record Quality: -0.316 (306th)
Avg. Season Rank: 302.76 (308th)
Pace: 69.40 (196th)
Momentum: 1.94 (80th)
Off. Momentum: 3.10 (37th)
Def. Momentum: -1.16 (218th)
Consistency: -10.46 (330th)
Res. Consistency: -12.65 (254th)
Away From Home: 2.63 (12th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.25 (211th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.33 28.39 70.22 80.30 40.90 30.91 31.39 20.74 33.83 28.66 56.27 10.11 10.21 4.17 38.49 25.83 35.69 2.03
RANK: 277th 175th 158th 256th 284th 101st 302nd 278th 251st 174th 253rd 220th 338th 335th 85th 277th 153rd 239th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.91 31.77 -- 80.59 49.39 25.63 39.72 22.02 37.02 32.94 65.18 11.67 15.40 8.76 31.81 27.32 40.87 1.91
RANK: 319th 285th -- 101st 344th 34th 343rd 97th 214th 308th 323rd 244th 196th 311th 53rd 111th 319th 321st

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, Campbell should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. They are ranked #312 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 12-18. Of the 11 schools in the Big South (average ranking 242.0), they're currently ranked as our #10 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.325 (which ranks 333rd nationally), Campbell has had one of the cushiest slates in all of college basketball.

Defense is not exactly a strength for Campbell this year. The team is ranked 319th in defensive efficiency and allows more than 110 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Campbell allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 39.7% of their three-pointers (ninth from the bottom in the nation), 65.2% of their near-proximity attempts (323rd), and 49.4% of their total shots from the field (eighth from the bottom). Campbell also gives up too many chances to easily score off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 8.8% of all second-chance opportunities (311th nationally).

Campbell doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 95 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #277 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Campbell poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 10.21 in potential points scored off of second chances (338th nationally), and they convert just 4.2% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 335th) as well. Campbell also won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 302nd in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.4% of their attempts from long vs. AO.

Campbell has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 330th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict. When playing on the road, Campbell has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 12th in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, Campbell often performs worse than normal. Campbell is more efficient than usual 38% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.03. In their other contests, Campbell performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25243rd243rd218th262ndCAA282nd360th284th339th230th249th
2023-24320th320th249th285thCAA217th296th286th97th220th313th
2022-23205th205th219th248thBig South332nd232nd270th60th20th233rd
2021-22218th218th159th236thBig South343rd59th324th77th64th183rd
2020-21173rd173rd99th162ndBig South348th262nd261st233rd122nd223rd
2019-20261st260th217th286thBig South309th279th347th64th124th230th
2018-19178th176th101st151stBig South257th38th242nd156th218th200th
2017-18210th210th169th248thBig South211th251st327th53rd282nd213th
2016-17273rd272nd177th236thBig South297th274th326th268th8th295th
2015-16312th312th247th306thBig South196th330th333rd211th12th308th
2014-15291st290th304th322ndBig South331st292nd290th179th243rd289th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25267th332nd58th227th228th165th291st246th260th152nd177th145th335th358th148th241st141st174th
2023-24279th253rd186th349th177th215th176th334th282nd114th188th190th353rd344th133rd316th57th122nd
2022-23151st91st246th310th83rd235th204th337th235th37th104th254th250th211th192nd330th16th65th
2021-22224th337th308th96th169th156th186th177th259th143rd119th171st288th323rd177th197th161st174th
2020-21135th250th270th310th28th264th11th112th44th287th65th280th354th288th225th87th250th189th
2019-20265th345th147th186th215th151st165th185th285th208th166th130th342nd339th137th191st205th223rd
2018-19143rd268th26th106th202nd22nd193rd250th28th241st226th162nd223rd305th31st262nd264th316th
2017-18138th228th30th234th159th71st55th269th226th238th214th61st344th326th60th268th222nd281st
2016-17260th290th45th269th256th119th185th226th169th248th291st256th344th330th98th214th219th245th
2015-16277th175th158th256th284th101st302nd278th251st174th253rd220th338th335th85th277th153rd239th
2014-15281st229th347th285th264th20th113th338th346th240th233rd241st306th312th17th336th196th325th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25189th72nd--203rd296th113th103rd141st212th310th333rd171st150th236th104th133rd304th301st
2023-24338th11th--353rd311th355th319th59th344th245th280th323rd226th282nd342nd20th153rd56th
2022-23261st197th--193rd241st331st217th28th114th197th323rd229th237th192nd328th20th190th81st
2021-22171st94th--137th243rd193rd298th270th214th60th299th208th69th165th208th287th71st89th
2020-21248th56th--247th305th218th62nd171st341st212th321st142nd170th346th192nd158th197th176th
2019-20241st313th--91st282nd28th127th245th181st218th313th250th214th293rd41st265th239th302nd
2018-19251st247th--43rd301st208th256th115th320th75th318th95th113th291st272nd148th114th94th
2017-18280th193rd--170th305th165th230th190th314th182nd310th131st79th154th158th197th180th175th
2016-17280th312th--183rd228th176th136th124th147th251st265th320th296th296th160th111th251st232nd
2015-16319th285th--101st344th34th343rd97th214th308th323rd244th196th311th53rd111th319th321st
2014-15294th320th--75th302nd84th193rd111th256th232nd297th338th229th229th114th141st271st268th