TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Binghamton  12-17 (0.414)  |  America East
All-Play Percentage: 0.179 (294th)
Schedule Strength: 0.267 (341st)
Record Quality: -0.277 (308th)
Avg. Season Rank: 289.72 (296th)
Pace: 68.09 (167th)
Momentum: 1.26 (121st)
Off. Momentum: -0.22 (214th)
Def. Momentum: 1.48 (71st)
Consistency: -7.98 (35th)
Res. Consistency: -10.20 (71st)
Away From Home: 1.90 (29th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.50 (241st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.24 21.07 67.06 84.35 40.88 30.33 33.44 28.66 36.14 25.37 55.13 8.52 11.86 3.71 35.95 33.97 30.07 2.06
RANK: 307th 320th 317th 184th 301st 197th 156th 60th 250th 313th 284th 302nd 252nd 301st 200th 55th 316th 252nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.94 26.75 -- 86.07 44.18 29.59 32.67 30.20 41.72 26.28 59.96 12.97 14.64 5.83 34.38 35.09 30.53 2.04
RANK: 233rd 257th -- 254th 208th 132nd 148th 338th 321st 64th 203rd 328th 272nd 278th 106th 338th 45th 137th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Binghamton likely fits the bill. Ranked 294th overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 12-17. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 10) in the America East (average ranking 261.3). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.267 (which ranks 341st in the nation), Binghamton has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to Binghamton. The team is ranked 307th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 94 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Binghamton has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 12.97, which ranks 328th in D1. Binghamton also struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.07 vs. AO, they are 320th in the overall rankings for that category.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Binghamton still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #233 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Binghamton has done a lackluster job this year when defending the mid-range shot. The squad is ranked 321st nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 41.7% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Making matters worse, AO will take advantage of that weakness and put up mid-range shots in abundance. Of AO's total field goals, a huge portion of them (35.1%) will be from those in-between locations.

Binghamton is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 35th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm. On the road, Binghamton performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 29th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Binghamton performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.16%, Binghamton is more efficient than normal 63% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 13% of the time.
When playing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, Binghamton usually performs better than average. Binghamton is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.31. In all other contests, Binghamton performs better than average 25% of the time.
Binghamton is typically worse vs. teams that prefer the outside shot. Against foes that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.04, Binghamton performs above their norm 37% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Binghamton edges New Hampshire in America East quarters
(3/6/2022 3:46:35 PM) DURHAM, N.H. (AP) — Jacob Falko had 21 points as Binghamton edged past New Hampshire 72-69 in a quarterfinal of the America East Conference playoffs o...
Falko scores 20 to lead Binghamton past NJIT 68-57
(1/22/2022 10:03:47 PM) NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Jacob Falko had 20 points as Binghamton beat NJIT 68-57 on Saturday night.
Balanced Binghamton beats D-III SUNY-Oneonta 79-55
(12/11/2021 5:01:12 PM) VESTAL, N.Y. (AP) — Hakon Hjalmarsson, George Tinsley and Jacob Falko scored 15 points apiece as Binghamton routed SUNY-Oneonta 79-55 on Saturday. Tin...
Binghamton goes up against SUNY-Oneonta
(12/9/2021 3:31:26 PM) SUNY-Oneonta vs. Binghamton (2-6)
McCoy scores 27 to lead Boston U. past Binghamton 68-63
(12/4/2021 4:22:47 PM) BOSTON (AP) — Javante McCoy had a season-high 27 points as Boston University narrowly beat Binghamton 68-63 on Saturday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25326th326th218th306thAmerica East233rd146th349th274th270th330th
2023-24269th269th193rd240thAmerica East255th201st315th322nd272nd290th
2022-23300th300th260th290thAmerica East229th217th290th268th103rd318th
2021-22294th294th253rd308thAmerica East167th35th341st241st29th296th
2020-21296th296th318th340thAmerica East243rd340th270th295th2nd322nd
2019-20339th339th291st325thAmerica East157th72nd277th194th327th338th
2018-19337th337th314th324thAmerica East238th320th270th260th38th342nd
2017-18305th305th282nd320thAmerica East245th104th321st145th155th278th
2016-17318th318th269th306thAmerica East279th176th283rd324th214th304th
2015-16313th313th318th316thAmerica East318th209th306th197th136th316th
2014-15319th319th342nd333rdAmerica East248th196th220th222nd232nd333rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25324th225th238th357th248th235th171st333rd316th77th322nd349th308th342nd165th320th25th86th
2023-24253rd184th307th297th157th308th272nd214th193rd64th174th348th223rd142nd283rd201st48th38th
2022-23303rd279th257th211th249th321st304th3rd118th359th137th316th237th243rd313th4th356th223rd
2021-22307th320th317th184th301st197th156th60th250th313th284th302nd252nd301st200th55th316th252nd
2020-21260th338th307th192nd246th24th135th117th130th354th176th291st190th205th19th111th354th355th
2019-20245th337th51st121st311th8th227th222nd79th341st293rd304th328th352nd7th231st344th352nd
2018-19322nd349th345th148th304th32nd225th218th225th294th265th300th308th325th40th226th296th324th
2017-18318th304th346th144th311th142nd223rd144th237th215th325th305th156th271st142nd143rd224th215th
2016-17317th298th168th251st310th92nd272nd206th153rd291st318th250th291st334th73rd193rd276th289th
2015-16341st230th261st308th340th140th343rd213th287th309th295th262nd218th274th95th180th268th277th
2014-15320th119th279th313th309th228th305th232nd304th203rd290th287th137th208th184th197th138th149th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25302nd256th--345th197th293rd145th165th227th286th208th352nd340th185th237th104th217th170th
2023-24261st316th--237th177th120th273rd309th171st121st158th254th200th230th93rd306th111th179th
2022-23271st329th--199th232nd24th138th357th320th78th234th180th333rd278th21st360th63rd241st
2021-22233rd257th--254th208th132nd148th338th321st64th203rd328th272nd278th106th338th45th137th
2020-21316th85th--341st281st156th351st323rd278th263rd119th277th319th212th75th279th189th248th
2019-20347th258th--352nd330th238th310th258th345th320th236th315th338th330th117th180th231st245th
2018-19319th53rd--348th291st183rd351st315th155th256th229th325th339th335th89th281st163rd221st
2017-18266th158th--227th271st89th329th277th294th198th153rd124th70th152nd72nd270th179th240th
2016-17302nd167th--247th287th231st301st169th289th204th260th223rd233rd264th201st157th175th173rd
2015-16183rd146th--243rd189th195th87th218th223rd213th230th310th267th241st164th193rd193rd191st
2014-15278th141st--213th268th264th326th75th172nd241st227th328th190th158th252nd61st225th175th