TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Belmont  23-7 (0.767)  |  Ohio Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.771 (81st)
Schedule Strength: 0.493 (169th)
Record Quality: 0.240 (61st)
Avg. Season Rank: 104.99 (105th)
Pace: 69.66 (217th)
Momentum: -1.14 (223rd)
Off. Momentum: -0.01 (206th)
Def. Momentum: -1.13 (218th)
Consistency: -7.34 (23rd)
Res. Consistency: -9.70 (71st)
Away From Home: -0.62 (222nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.15 (114th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.00 21.70 79.02 83.79 46.17 42.52 34.07 13.07 41.11 28.20 66.77 6.98 10.43 4.57 50.75 15.60 33.65 2.17
RANK: 56th 334th 4th 65th 76th 3rd 216th 350th 16th 186th 24th 347th 328th 329th 2nd 351st 216th 345th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.33 24.95 -- 84.22 44.08 27.04 33.75 27.35 39.10 29.82 58.01 10.14 14.17 7.25 32.11 32.48 35.41 1.97
RANK: 179th 77th -- 277th 162nd 66th 80th 310th 286th 234th 116th 123rd 155th 226th 38th 296th 191st 268th

ANALYSIS:
Belmont has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. Haslametrics has them ranked 81st overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 23-7. Of the 12 schools in the OVC (average ranking 211.3), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Belmont succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 56th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Belmont lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks second in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 34.1% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Belmont is also deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 79.0% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked fourth nationally in free throw percentage. Though they typically convert their shots from the line, the downside is that they hardly ever manage to get there. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of 21.70 vs. AO (18th-worst in the nation). Belmont is lastly superb at converting jumpers in between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 16th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 41.1% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. If Belmont does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a second-chance conversion percentage of just 4.6% vs. AO, which ranks 23rd-worst in the nation.

The defense for Belmont, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 179th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Belmont is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #347 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 6.98 vs. AO.

Belmont is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 23rd in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Belmont is typically better vs. teams that tend to get off more shots. Against foes that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.10, Belmont performs above their norm 55% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 11% of the time.
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, Belmont often performs worse than normal. Belmont is more efficient than usual 21% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.03%. In their other contests, Belmont performs better than the norm 60% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25115th115th65th66thMVC30th136th116th68th5th126th
2023-24101st101st111th101stMVC22nd339th121st281st269th134th
2022-23131st131st74th101stMVC99th158th176th246th313th145th
2021-2295th93rd32nd64thOVC86th256th186th357th297th53rd
2020-21111th111th6th55thOVC113th106th323rd279th204th109th
2019-20115th115th15th87thOVC63rd148th301st167th152nd102nd
2018-1942nd42nd13th36thOVC34th262nd211th230th7th70th
2017-1876th76th37th79thOVC238th213th239th112th261st86th
2016-1781st81st24th61stOVC217th23rd169th114th222nd105th
2015-16122nd122nd98th129thOVC48th171st186th57th172nd110th
2014-15127th127th64th111thOVC63rd188th218th197th138th151st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2585th335th233rd89th97th31st17th239th134th265th138th108th148th90th44th260th295th333rd
2023-2499th245th112th293rd51st62nd47th318th111th240th44th94th290th165th34th307th204th298th
2022-2356th345th84th40th69th44th22nd223rd117th175th92nd133rd165th272nd68th259th232nd289th
2021-2284th298th100th202nd31st66th220th350th60th31st26th9th297th192nd63rd351st32nd167th
2020-2171st319th88th51st61st41st186th320th277th39th14th73rd260th265th74th335th64th191st
2019-20110th344th193rd27th98th27th196th271st155th125th34th100th309th275th50th296th178th271st
2018-1920th257th90th68th16th38th71st339th142nd26th25th96th248th140th65th344th48th167th
2017-1839th339th123rd63rd44th2nd64th351st83rd113th39th315th245th150th3rd351st154th337th
2016-1756th334th4th65th76th3rd216th350th16th186th24th347th328th329th2nd351st216th345th
2015-1638th273rd59th251st19th5th106th348th43rd255th2nd297th309th160th3rd347th231st340th
2014-1562nd338th213th84th60th5th86th340th24th187th66th197th291st202nd5th345th220th341st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25178th65th--278th189th286th106th185th206th180th277th301st304th305th262nd167th144th122nd
2023-24108th80th--218th111th228th103rd256th117th107th218th256th83rd140th215th247th101st111th
2022-23209th155th--308th198th64th294th313th101st302nd163rd138th280th190th32nd294th267th317th
2021-22108th25th--221st156th204th170th209th137th176th170th140th103rd157th193rd189th150th163rd
2020-21145th32nd--302nd182nd138th213th311th182nd196th173rd133rd295th253rd87th286th161st219th
2019-20104th28th--229th172nd124th268th312th104th108th227th58th249th280th96th311th84th170th
2018-1980th35th--272nd107th103rd94th339th305th99th62nd82nd266th227th69th335th78th186th
2017-18157th33rd--310th140th206th120th322nd279th96th132nd76th86th41st134th313th67th116th
2016-17179th77th--277th162nd66th80th310th286th234th116th123rd155th226th38th296th191st268th
2015-16279th216th--245th230th221st234th321st290th39th291st209th304th300th182nd315th20th60th
2014-15227th47th--239th270th228th111th190th205th192nd336th266th218th241st208th164th166th162nd