TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Ohio  16-16 (0.500)  |  Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.576 (155th)
 Schedule Strength: 0.406 (201st)
 Record Quality: -0.056 (206th)
 Avg. Season Rank: 149.64 (149th)
Pace: 69.19 (41st)
 Momentum: -2.88 (300th)
 Off. Momentum: -1.16 (267th)
 Def. Momentum: -1.72 (258th)
Consistency: -9.46 (184th)
 Res. Consistency: -12.99 (209th)
 Away From Home: -2.78 (340th)
 Paper Tiger Factor: -0.98 (176th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.33 27.93 76.96 86.26 44.26 33.96 33.80 19.95 39.19 32.35 58.36 14.19 12.91 5.24 39.37 23.12 37.51 2.02
RANK: 149th 149th 43rd 223rd 158th 172nd 190th 226th 109th 161st 185th 73rd 259th 256th 160th 224th 144th 177th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.81 28.85 -- 83.98 45.82 29.25 36.05 19.57 37.63 35.16 58.50 11.48 11.78 4.57 34.82 23.30 41.87 1.93
RANK: 166th 249th -- 45th 264th 26th 290th 102nd 189th 316th 168th 131st 18th 39th 47th 131st 343rd 339th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Ohio should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 155th overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 16-16. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 12) in the MAC (average ranking 226.5).

Based on the data, Ohio will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #149 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Ohio does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 77.0% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 43rd nationally in free throw percentage.

Ohio plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 166th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 108 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Ohio does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 11.78 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 18th in the country), and they allow AO to convert just 4.6% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 39th) as well. Ohio also does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 45th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 83.98 vs. AO.

On the road, Ohio performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 340th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Ohio performs worse against squads that shoot the ball well from the field. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.39%, Ohio is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 82% of the time.
When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Ohio usually performs worse than average. Ohio is more efficient than normal 32% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.65%. In all other contests, Ohio performs better than average 75% of the time.
Ohio is typically worse vs. teams that are typically efficient on offense. Against foes that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 104.01, Ohio performs above their norm 36% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 78% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25155th155th196th206thMAC41st184th201st176th340th149th
2023-24139th139th111th168thMAC150th144th263rd246th141st155th
2022-23133rd133rd130th157thMAC115th282nd216th250th357th136th
2021-22124th123rd49th106thMAC157th231st270th280th189th90th
2020-2177th76th63rd69thMAC126th231st149th138th89th95th
2019-20141st141st166th185thMAC234th81st173rd236th198th170th
2018-19181st179th223rd167thMAC122nd288th81st231st308th181st
2017-18198th198th222nd208thMAC41st303rd178th209th320th178th
2016-17108th108th73rd110thMAC75th227th222nd126th191st103rd
2015-16139th137th75th105thMAC88th11th206th86th168th127th
2014-15235th235th290th225thMAC75th233rd128th169th285th208th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25149th149th43rd223rd158th172nd190th226th109th161st185th73rd259th256th160th224th144th177th
2023-24139th183rd177th137th200th38th136th335th303rd121st196th36th263rd265th38th338th125th267th
2022-2368th256th71st8th160th66th95th201st174th85th206th60th39th27th122nd254th164th209th
2021-22170th144th89th118th265th42nd254th330th300th90th225th144th187th172nd47th335th107th253rd
2020-2165th219th220th129th38th123rd52nd303rd128th45th73rd137th106th77th128th311th55th133rd
2019-20138th217th239th128th158th38th176th325th153rd113th161st187th128th117th44th328th120th261st
2018-19225th163rd348th220th137th287th298th222nd240th49th116th155th258th165th279th218th39th40th
2017-18254th229th276th301st189th240th66th174th286th189th226th159th334th332nd198th146th151st144th
2016-17140th243rd220th155th148th82nd48th316th143rd64th280th218th258th245th79th317th74th192nd
2015-16102nd285th23rd180th70th128th70th287th128th68th118th342nd246th121st126th291st68th144th
2014-15229th342nd72nd129th215th69th162nd229th150th185th228th139th166th119th81st247th205th245th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25166th249th--45th264th26th290th102nd189th316th168th131st18th39th47th131st343rd339th
2023-24143rd230th--102nd167th97th276th85th47th298th110th34th306th304th104th95th323rd306th
2022-23202nd250th--102nd247th195th208th114th89th172nd329th131st117th160th228th135th200th165th
2021-22163rd64th--168th203rd143rd93rd200th233rd202nd249th55th64th119th146th199th198th217th
2020-21112th73rd--109th145th229th141st138th40th114th305th106th66th173rd264th159th125th104th
2019-20200th220th--125th147th183rd179th66th125th260th132nd191st54th17th202nd71st277th224th
2018-19144th74th--222nd144th161st250th114th108th293rd74th166th185th87th143rd102nd279th262nd
2017-18160th92nd--197th169th148th92nd158th256th231st156th154th221st284th139th149th232nd225th
2016-1791st120th--131st130th189th91st20th88th310th88th219th109th145th189th21st322nd273rd
2015-16231st78th--270th193rd215th303rd11th170th342nd42nd221st124th61st166th3rd338th312th
2014-15255th101st--314th182nd224th277th54th249th334th50th155th64th63rd169th25th317th283rd
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.