TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Ohio  23-12 (0.657)  |  Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.609 (139th)
Schedule Strength: 0.466 (206th)
Record Quality: 0.143 (105th)
Avg. Season Rank: 131.04 (127th)
Pace: 71.36 (88th)
Momentum: -3.25 (312th)
Off. Momentum: -2.97 (330th)
Def. Momentum: -0.29 (169th)
Consistency: -7.29 (11th)
Res. Consistency: -11.06 (138th)
Away From Home: 0.04 (168th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.31 (86th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.78 25.62 75.83 81.86 45.91 30.23 37.01 20.44 36.26 31.19 60.86 7.06 13.47 7.18 36.93 24.97 38.11 1.99
RANK: 102nd 285th 23rd 180th 70th 128th 70th 287th 128th 68th 118th 342nd 246th 121st 126th 291st 68th 144th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.43 26.15 -- 84.49 44.43 29.46 37.68 18.78 35.93 36.25 54.32 11.38 14.19 5.60 34.87 22.23 42.91 1.92
RANK: 231st 78th -- 270th 193rd 215th 303rd 11th 170th 342nd 42nd 221st 124th 61st 166th 3rd 338th 312th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Ohio should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They are ranked #139 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 23-12. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 12) in the MAC (average ranking 168.3).

Ohio will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 102nd in offensive efficiency and scores more than 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Ohio is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 75.8% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 23rd nationally in free throw percentage. Unfortunately, with a free throw attempt rate of just 25.62 vs. AO, they don't provide themselves a whole lot of opportunities at the foul line. Ohio also makes an effort to get off shots from the inside more so than the perimeter. The ball-club is 68th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 60.9% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category.

The defense for Ohio, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 231st in defensive efficiency, allowing about 105 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Ohio is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #342 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.06 vs. AO. Ohio also does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 303rd nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.7% of their attempts from afar. If Ohio does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from converting from locations near the basket. AO will convert just 54.3% of their near-proximity field goal attempts, and the team ranks 42nd-best in the country in that category as a result.

Ohio has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 312th in the country in positive momentum. Ohio is also one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 11th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, Ohio usually performs better than average. Ohio is more efficient than normal 61% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.90%. In all other contests, Ohio performs better than average 18% of the time.
Ohio is typically better vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 32.88%, Ohio performs above their norm 58% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Ohio often performs better than normal. Ohio is more efficient than usual 73% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In their other contests, Ohio performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25154th154th196th206thMAC41st183rd202nd177th340th149th
2023-24139th139th111th168thMAC150th144th263rd246th141st155th
2022-23133rd133rd130th157thMAC115th282nd216th250th357th136th
2021-22124th123rd49th106thMAC157th231st270th280th189th90th
2020-2177th76th63rd69thMAC126th231st149th138th89th95th
2019-20141st141st166th185thMAC234th81st173rd236th198th170th
2018-19181st179th223rd167thMAC122nd288th81st231st308th181st
2017-18198th198th222nd208thMAC41st303rd178th209th320th178th
2016-17108th108th73rd110thMAC75th227th222nd126th191st103rd
2015-16139th137th75th105thMAC88th11th206th86th168th127th
2014-15235th235th290th225thMAC75th233rd128th169th285th208th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25151st149th43rd223rd157th174th190th227th109th161st187th73rd259th256th160th224th147th175th
2023-24139th183rd177th137th200th38th136th335th303rd121st196th36th263rd265th38th338th125th267th
2022-2368th256th71st8th160th66th95th201st174th85th206th60th39th27th122nd254th164th209th
2021-22170th144th89th118th265th42nd254th330th300th90th225th144th187th172nd47th335th107th253rd
2020-2165th219th220th129th38th123rd52nd303rd128th45th73rd137th106th77th128th311th55th133rd
2019-20138th217th239th128th158th38th176th325th153rd113th161st187th128th117th44th328th120th261st
2018-19225th163rd348th220th137th287th298th222nd240th49th116th155th258th165th279th218th39th40th
2017-18254th229th276th301st189th240th66th174th286th189th226th159th334th332nd198th146th151st144th
2016-17140th243rd220th155th148th82nd48th316th143rd64th280th218th258th245th79th317th74th192nd
2015-16102nd285th23rd180th70th128th70th287th128th68th118th342nd246th121st126th291st68th144th
2014-15229th342nd72nd129th215th69th162nd229th150th185th228th139th166th119th81st247th205th245th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25166th249th--45th263rd26th292nd102nd193rd317th168th131st18th39th48th131st343rd339th
2023-24143rd230th--102nd167th97th276th85th47th298th110th34th306th304th104th95th323rd306th
2022-23202nd250th--102nd247th195th208th114th89th172nd329th131st117th160th228th135th200th165th
2021-22163rd64th--168th203rd143rd93rd200th233rd202nd249th55th64th119th146th199th198th217th
2020-21112th73rd--109th145th229th141st138th40th114th305th106th66th173rd264th159th125th104th
2019-20200th220th--125th147th183rd179th66th125th260th132nd191st54th17th202nd71st277th224th
2018-19144th74th--222nd144th161st250th114th108th293rd74th166th185th87th143rd102nd279th262nd
2017-18160th92nd--197th169th148th92nd158th256th231st156th154th221st284th139th149th232nd225th
2016-1791st120th--131st130th189th91st20th88th310th88th219th109th145th189th21st322nd273rd
2015-16231st78th--270th193rd215th303rd11th170th342nd42nd221st124th61st166th3rd338th312th
2014-15255th101st--314th182nd224th277th54th249th334th50th155th64th63rd169th25th317th283rd