TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Austin Peay  9-22 (0.290)  |  Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.080 (334th)
Schedule Strength: 0.418 (207th)
Record Quality: -0.323 (332nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 293.66 (302nd)
Pace: 65.55 (312th)
Momentum: -5.66 (349th)
Off. Momentum: -2.01 (326th)
Def. Momentum: -3.65 (338th)
Consistency: -10.16 (296th)
Res. Consistency: -14.68 (320th)
Away From Home: -1.63 (294th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.59 (304th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.44 21.98 71.47 85.36 40.16 32.02 31.75 26.83 32.48 26.51 58.09 10.72 14.49 4.97 37.51 31.43 31.05 2.06
RANK: 323rd 323rd 196th 143rd 333rd 145th 298th 92nd 353rd 305th 198th 176th 160th 219th 153rd 96th 310th 273rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.51 30.08 -- 82.38 47.99 26.81 33.94 21.36 39.27 34.21 64.45 12.20 14.53 5.94 32.54 25.93 41.53 1.91
RANK: 324th 337th -- 89th 351st 26th 169th 74th 241st 346th 344th 291st 236th 264th 49th 93rd 359th 352nd

ANALYSIS:
Austin Peay presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Their record this season is 9-22, and the club is ranked 334th overall (out of 363) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 14) in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 208.1).

Austin Peay will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #324 in defensive efficiency. Austin Peay is one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #351 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.0% of their total attempts from the floor. Austin Peay also fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked 344th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 64.5% of their attempts from close-up. And with such little resistance, AO will merrily cut, slash, and drive right to the hoop as often as possible. Of AO's total field goals, a big portion of them (41.5%) will be from short-distance.

Austin Peay doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #323 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Austin Peay is downright rotten when shooting the mid-range jumper. The team is ranked 353rd in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 32.5% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. Exacerbating the situation, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting only 40.2% of all their attempts from the floor vs. AO. Austin Peay also struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.98 vs. AO, they are 323rd in the overall rankings for that category.

Austin Peay has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 349th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, Austin Peay often performs worse than normal. Austin Peay is more efficient than usual 35% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.62. In their other contests, Austin Peay performs better than the norm 82% of the time.
Austin Peay does better vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 45.47%, Austin Peay performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 39% of the time.
Austin Peay performs better against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.13, Austin Peay is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 25% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25287th287th256th258thAtlantic Sun216th362nd211th155th244th286th
2023-24271st271st170th214thAtlantic Sun301st299th261st187th211th280th
2022-23334th333rd327th332ndAtlantic Sun312th296th207th304th294th302nd
2021-22307th307th253rd253rdOVC305th156th203rd311th191st292nd
2020-21214th214th175th237thOVC255th32nd315th171st210th205th
2019-20157th157th88th145thOVC202nd96th253rd343rd273rd163rd
2018-19115th115th64th122ndOVC88th91st254th104th316th137th
2017-18192nd191st147th177thOVC87th302nd225th326th303rd183rd
2016-17294th294th272nd269thOVC98th93rd184th262nd234th301st
2015-16236th236th186th204thOVC80th202nd214th315th68th258th
2014-15311th311th328th318thOVC61st13th183rd140th124th305th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25275th290th216th106th312th129th257th278th281st59th351st191st236th215th151st289th73rd128th
2023-24163rd182nd255th48th216th173rd171st106th204th172nd229th212th117th186th222nd124th218th179th
2022-23323rd323rd196th143rd333rd145th298th92nd353rd305th198th176th160th219th153rd96th310th273rd
2021-22325th321st273rd185th336th40th285th90th252nd356th204th180th137th153rd37th87th357th351st
2020-21156th267th57th29th223rd164th241st47th278th241st86th221st31st36th223rd63rd287th222nd
2019-2094th48th202nd89th154th252nd86th57th272nd192nd107th154th42nd39th277th63rd221st125th
2018-1960th71st166th31st128th236th50th33rd71st170th215th193rd24th43rd283rd50th219th133rd
2017-18184th85th324th160th147th322nd169th47th228th138th125th186th63rd49th326th47th141st57th
2016-17163rd104th182nd267th138th186th183rd135th13th283rd206th295th278th265th165th112th261st228th
2015-16186th31st311th333rd106th314th169th199th190th114th132nd124th102nd31st281st157th48th44th
2014-15314th106th258th193rd321st270th338th138th339th110th269th207th77th61st269th130th91st79th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25285th267th--88th321st24th360th63rd108th351st196th148th106th136th30th72nd362nd358th
2023-24347th341st--153rd352nd56th243rd218th259th277th354th20th342nd353rd56th227th282nd315th
2022-23324th337th--89th351st26th169th74th241st346th344th291st236th264th49th93rd359th352nd
2021-22248th320th--50th306th124th163rd140th274th147th350th233rd148th244th177th180th192nd201st
2020-21285th228th--35th349th83rd342nd79th304th200th326th294th234th344th131st117th276th265th
2019-20225th136th--96th309th88th324th112th251st266th221st101st171st292nd100th137th295th282nd
2018-19200th221st--71st287th93rd192nd146th210th171st320th57th189th329th133rd182nd215th227th
2017-18221st293rd--11th304th73rd290th36th271st212th243rd113th17th171st152nd64th284th260th
2016-17345th131st--331st336th267th275th102nd348th332nd284th256th350th350th187th54th286th244th
2015-16272nd102nd--222nd294th271st188th75th283rd246th308th326th203rd302nd257th58th236th158th
2014-15279th186th--53rd328th110th331st19th220th295th283rd340th105th331st158th23rd322nd288th