TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Miami (OH)  15-17 (0.469)  |  Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.244 (274th)
Schedule Strength: 0.367 (247th)
Record Quality: -0.136 (250th)
Avg. Season Rank: 259.79 (269th)
Pace: 67.71 (181st)
Momentum: -2.63 (281st)
Off. Momentum: -5.10 (360th)
Def. Momentum: 2.47 (37th)
Consistency: -10.44 (315th)
Res. Consistency: -16.89 (354th)
Away From Home: -0.54 (232nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.82 (341st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.69 23.70 70.60 82.58 41.76 32.50 33.78 22.64 37.76 27.44 54.52 11.69 12.00 3.59 39.35 27.42 33.23 2.06
RANK: 312th 285th 249th 310th 285th 144th 203rd 182nd 236th 302nd 278th 160th 240th 340th 107th 158th 277th 282nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.02 25.97 -- 86.96 43.79 32.90 33.31 21.72 41.63 32.34 55.91 13.12 16.10 6.20 37.84 24.97 37.19 2.01
RANK: 185th 173rd -- 262nd 156th 252nd 126th 131st 291st 255th 104th 298th 335th 267th 225th 117th 221st 191st

ANALYSIS:
Miami (OH) presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They are ranked #274 (out of 362) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 15-17. Of the 12 schools in the MAC (average ranking 245.3), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Miami (OH) is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #312 in offensive efficiency. Miami (OH) does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 3.6% of all second-chance opportunities (340th nationally).

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in defensive efficiency, Miami (OH) isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #185 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Miami (OH) can be weak on rebounding, giving the opposition too many chances to score off of the offensive glass. The club has a rating of 16.10 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (335th nationally).

Miami (OH) has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 315th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Miami (OH) performs worse against squads that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.38, Miami (OH) is more efficient than normal 25% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 72% of the time.
When playing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Miami (OH) usually performs worse than average. Miami (OH) is more efficient than normal 29% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.72%. In all other contests, Miami (OH) performs better than average 75% of the time.
Miami (OH) is typically better vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.30%, Miami (OH) performs above their norm 82% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 37% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25147th147th34th96thMAC94th99th272nd245th307th181st
2023-24274th274th226th250thMAC181st315th247th341st232nd269th
2022-23257th257th280th312thMAC226th266th218th221st170th269th
2021-22266th265th234th261stMAC168th286th260th141st96th207th
2020-21200th200th168th166thMAC311th222nd198th341st84th174th
2019-20209th209th264th227thMAC258th126th145th119th233rd227th
2018-19152nd152nd212th170thMAC247th125th85th252nd280th135th
2017-18200th200th203rd209thMAC230th103rd158th75th208th252nd
2016-17253rd252nd285th273rdMAC140th49th196th37th55th248th
2015-16237th237th251st232ndMAC327th305th177th32nd195th230th
2014-15211th211th249th222ndMAC160th239th156th67th155th234th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25139th314th188th127th145th65th37th191st142nd304th179th168th259th258th74th194th310th325th
2023-24312th285th249th310th285th144th203rd182nd236th302nd278th160th240th340th107th158th277th282nd
2022-23193rd238th7th285th167th156th290th156th11th324th185th345th273rd182nd120th133rd301st288th
2021-22181st332nd4th46th267th59th167th44th151st343rd179th194th304th223rd88th59th350th336th
2020-21127th275th33rd55th220th81st56th69th135th302nd285th334th219th168th121st92nd332nd298th
2019-20176th251st110th84th249th50th171st158th120th290th240th284th226th285th63rd177th303rd313th
2018-19187th54th173rd215th279th30th220th262nd157th291st255th251st277th326th22nd261st283rd328th
2017-18244th310th264th178th246th28th217th274th319th267th128th34th244th328th28th282nd265th314th
2016-17305th198th135th316th260th235th328th258th191st108th245th100th238th180th201st233rd70th104th
2015-16297th177th57th240th299th244th337th37th149th330th211th97th215th255th240th26th320th242nd
2014-15200th193rd116th275th136th265th197th161st157th148th141st23rd297th216th247th138th110th97th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25169th180th--89th225th145th256th74th100th250th210th252nd210th256th173rd86th286th248th
2023-24185th173rd--262nd156th252nd126th131st291st255th104th298th335th267th225th117th221st191st
2022-23309th348th--109th289th126th197th273rd329th89th293rd268th352nd247th140th290th105th161st
2021-22340th204th--236th335th253rd337th133rd291st218th335th263rd200th315th226th121st195th161st
2020-21291st99th--259th268th326th315th204th201st72nd318th175th75th248th313th187th52nd35th
2019-20230th292nd--83rd252nd181st298th182nd82nd87th307th36th261st300th221st204th103rd116th
2018-19136th216th--142nd135th188th149th151st68th165th172nd193rd119th71st191st149th176th180th
2017-18145th45th--203rd221st136th93rd197th184th218th286th178th128th229th130th199th207th219th
2016-17193rd251st--52nd208th239th101st43rd268th145th233rd331st258th185th295th59th185th112th
2015-16173rd190th--94th145th287th215th154th195th49th171st120th312th274th309th178th58th39th
2014-15216th239th--49th286th243rd158th71st328th91st315th146th103rd222nd296th107th121st75th