TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 AR-Pine Bluff  7-24 (0.226)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.031 (347th)
Schedule Strength: 0.368 (241st)
Record Quality: -0.419 (344th)
Avg. Season Rank: 349.11 (354th)
Pace: 68.65 (124th)
Momentum: 2.86 (46th)
Off. Momentum: 5.53 (2nd)
Def. Momentum: -2.67 (300th)
Consistency: -10.13 (281st)
Res. Consistency: -12.76 (234th)
Away From Home: -1.03 (298th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.41 (232nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.08 24.18 71.71 82.48 40.96 30.28 30.27 26.37 37.58 25.83 56.96 11.88 12.24 4.22 36.72 31.97 31.31 2.05
RANK: 298th 205th 175th 270th 297th 199th 316th 115th 181st 302nd 231st 103rd 229th 258th 173rd 103rd 289th 239th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.58 28.13 -- 84.90 49.89 29.00 35.47 24.64 41.34 31.25 70.01 11.22 16.87 6.95 34.16 29.03 36.81 1.97
RANK: 357th 306th -- 203rd 357th 102nd 295th 189th 312th 275th 358th 215th 350th 348th 98th 176th 282nd 284th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, AR-Pine Bluff likely fits the bill. They are ranked #347 (out of 358) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 7-24. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 12) in the SWAC (average ranking 290.1).

AR-Pine Bluff has one of the most inept defenses in the NCAA. Allowing about 116 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they're ranked way down at #357 in defensive efficiency. AR-Pine Bluff allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. They are exceptionally deficient defending inside the three-point line, allowing AO to make good on 41.3% of their mid-range jumpers (312th in the nation), 70.0% of their near-proximity chances (last), and 49.9% of their total shots from the field (second from the bottom). AR-Pine Bluff also gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 16.87 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ninth from the bottom nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 7.0% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 348th) as well.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, AR-Pine Bluff still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #298 in the nation in offensive efficiency. AR-Pine Bluff won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 316th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 30.3% of their attempts from long vs. AO.

AR-Pine Bluff has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #46 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, AR-Pine Bluff often performs worse than normal. AR-Pine Bluff is more efficient than usual 42% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.38%. In their other contests, AR-Pine Bluff performs better than the norm 90% of the time.
AR-Pine Bluff does better vs. clubs that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.66, AR-Pine Bluff performs above average 74% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
AR-Pine Bluff performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 31.55%, AR-Pine Bluff is more efficient than normal 70% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Morris leads UAPB against Grambling after 21-point performance
(1/23/2022 1:44:54 AM) Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions (4-16, 2-5 SWAC) at Grambling Tigers (7-12, 4-2 SWAC)
Williams lifts Southern over Arkansas-Pine Bluff 99-51
(1/22/2022 9:30:45 PM) BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Terrell Williams had a career-high 21 points as Southern romped past Arkansas-Pine Bluff 99-51 on Saturday.
No. 19 Cyclones overcome slow start, rout Ark-Pine Bluff
(12/1/2021 10:19:16 PM) AMES, Iowa (AP) — Izaiah Brockington had 23 points and 10 rebounds for his third double-double of the season, and No. 19 Iowa State shook off a slow s...
UAPB goes for first win vs Arkansas Baptist
(11/28/2021 6:33:09 AM) Arkansas Baptist vs. Arkansas-Pine Bluff (0-7)
#UAPBMensHoops Set for Season Debut Against Creighton
(11/9/2021 4:19:00 AM) OMAHA, NE – Headed in a new direction with an all-new coaching staff and several transfers, fans are in for a treat for the University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff men's basketball team. On Tuesday, Golden Lion men's basketball will take their talents to the Big Ea…
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25363rd363rd346th363rdSWAC32nd262nd338th349th246th363rd
2023-24331st331st266th328thSWAC20th329th336th106th24th341st
2022-23315th315th313th350thSWAC29th83rd287th50th101st315th
2021-22347th347th336th344thSWAC124th281st241st232nd298th354th
2020-21356th356th337th346thSWAC203rd329th272nd346th255th356th
2019-20350th350th348th349thSWAC290th25th265th53rd103rd347th
2018-19320th320th249th286thSWAC228th287th311th327th284th334th
2017-18326th326th261st290thSWAC113th101st337th336th219th337th
2016-17349th349th335th345thSWAC214th260th338th321st306th349th
2015-16339th339th327th324thSWAC333rd312th244th125th184th335th
2014-15332nd332nd269th303rdSWAC219th207th337th261st157th327th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25355th283rd364th320th267th315th347th290th204th25th324th307th318th322nd287th277th8th20th
2023-24283rd220th40th348th293rd42nd145th332nd35th315th359th318th337th305th20th314th269th340th
2022-23348th249th94th282nd357th122nd313th250th306th254th361st74th219th347th99th236th218th259th
2021-22298th205th175th270th297th199th316th115th181st302nd231st103rd229th258th173rd103rd289th239th
2020-21348th271st116th301st346th345th339th6th271st334th322nd315th256th345th336th2nd321st123rd
2019-20353rd272nd353rd350th348th348th350th12th335th344th238th219th288th305th333rd3rd325th138th
2018-19332nd126th297th345th289th328th204th78th292nd288th259th232nd144th149th303rd38th215th113th
2017-18341st256th292nd349th271st320th322nd46th121st332nd220th160th338th335th287th22nd301st176th
2016-17351st337th340th334th347th240th302nd63rd331st338th342nd157th231st326th208th35th327th256th
2015-16347th338th350th261st326th148th316th144th332nd307th226th153rd231st300th125th122nd289th269th
2014-15337th314th177th262nd329th169th289th140th329th300th287th20th255th287th143rd121st289th251st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25363rd340th--215th360th361st324th1st361st210th356th311th221st301st360th2nd200th36th
2023-24358th242nd--336th320th352nd90th49th359th215th348th132nd343rd355th343rd22nd145th50th
2022-23203rd346th--4th299th236th293rd2nd302nd66th262nd121st61st43rd338th11th199th71st
2021-22357th306th--203rd357th102nd295th189th312th275th358th215th350th348th98th176th282nd284th
2020-21356th310th--249th351st204th355th153rd281st247th340th315th299th332nd181st130th227th204th
2019-20246th348th--34th250th210th135th159th68th32nd352nd349th323rd238th279th215th56th47th
2018-19247th342nd--49th295th99th226th106th171st161st324th222nd263rd295th160th145th221st216th
2017-18251st330th--26th281st196th199th7th304th229th223rd320th206th313th278th12th291st200th
2016-17310th351st--2nd338th169th210th4th324th120th346th350th196th310th311th12th256th143rd
2015-16275th351st--26th239th119th134th49th112th186th282nd316th297th198th215th79th253rd213th
2014-15308th344th--10th310th194th334th29th266th102nd291st106th249th262nd291st64th183rd114th