TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Alabama A&M  10-17 (0.370)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.080 (322nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.304 (341st)
Record Quality: -0.316 (307th)
Avg. Season Rank: 275.69 (276th)
Pace: 67.06 (313th)
Momentum: -2.86 (300th)
Off. Momentum: -2.86 (321st)
Def. Momentum: 0.00 (147th)
Consistency: -8.66 (138th)
Res. Consistency: -10.86 (125th)
Away From Home: 0.16 (152nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.65 (60th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.63 28.75 61.82 85.80 39.87 29.81 28.31 27.69 32.95 28.29 58.82 12.50 18.58 6.99 34.75 32.28 32.97 2.02
RANK: 287th 168th 346th 30th 314th 142nd 348th 73rd 290th 198th 170th 76th 28th 134th 185th 94th 255th 209th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 112.06 33.13 -- 81.78 48.27 28.97 35.30 22.91 41.24 29.90 66.23 10.24 19.10 8.91 35.42 28.01 36.56 1.99
RANK: 334th 313th -- 157th 337th 186th 199th 131st 337th 217th 336th 113th 342nd 316th 187th 129th 228th 204th

ANALYSIS:
Alabama A&M presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Haslametrics has them ranked 322nd overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 10-17. Of the 10 schools in the SWAC (average ranking 291.6), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.304 (which ranks 341st nationally), Alabama A&M has had one of the cushiest slates in all of college basketball.

Alabama A&M has a very sieve-like defense that gives up points way too easily. The team is ranked 334th in efficiency on that end of the court and gives up more than 112 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Alabama A&M gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 19.10 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (tenth from the bottom nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 8.9% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 316th) as well. Alabama A&M also allows the opposition far too many easy shots from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major defensive field goal shooting categories. They are exceptionally deficient defending inside the three-point line, allowing AO to make good on 41.2% of their mid-range jumpers (337th in the nation), 66.2% of their near-proximity chances (336th), and 48.3% of their total shots from the field (337th).

Alabama A&M doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 95 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #287 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Alabama A&M is one of the least accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They are ranked fourth from the bottom in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 28.3% of their attempts from long vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 39.9% of their total attempts vs. AO. Alabama A&M also has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 61.8% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #346 overall in free throw percentage. If Alabama A&M does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities off of their frequent misses. The squad has a rating of 18.58 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 28th in all of college hoops.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Alabama A&M usually performs worse than average. Alabama A&M is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In all other contests, Alabama A&M performs better than average 77% of the time.
Alabama A&M is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.91, Alabama A&M performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, Alabama A&M often performs worse than normal. Alabama A&M is more efficient than usual 38% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.42%. In their other contests, Alabama A&M performs better than the norm 82% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25360th360th319th350thSWAC44th180th352nd334th322nd357th
2023-24326th326th308th320thSWAC54th62nd329th353rd312th352nd
2022-23304th304th230th306thSWAC187th131st339th31st133rd325th
2021-22312th312th261st285thSWAC148th11th350th288th204th324th
2020-21348th348th247th335thSWAC227th151st346th51st342nd345th
2019-20345th345th323rd336thSWAC134th100th343rd191st272nd343rd
2018-19346th346th347th349thSWAC280th19th334th148th257th349th
2017-18350th350th349th350thSWAC252nd319th328th296th191st347th
2016-17351st351st351st350thSWAC320th306th344th323rd284th351st
2015-16322nd322nd264th307thSWAC313th138th341st60th152nd276th
2014-15343rd343rd309th334thSWAC183rd68th347th331st212th345th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25360th189th334th328th360th210th320th188th351st273rd353rd128th199th218th167th161st238th225th
2023-24347th42nd125th357th329th361st356th41st197th211th350th205th162nd200th359th14th120th12th
2022-23325th179th352nd226th291st334th205th22nd236th260th304th44th152nd181st329th16th246th94th
2021-22355th195th159th210th353rd357th358th12th353rd113th340th203rd129th179th356th11th104th5th
2020-21352nd341st337th119th353rd324th353rd11th303rd254th344th325th255th278th331st10th264th97th
2019-20349th301st264th182nd350th327th345th42nd347th176th342nd207th165th159th330th36th161st60th
2018-19348th352nd332nd116th335th320th326th5th314th308th250th76th290th311th332nd7th311th141st
2017-18347th334th312th240th343rd285th344th95th318th191st308th313th68th190th275th81st180th116th
2016-17336th202nd198th101st340th324th351st33rd303rd153rd319th320th161st243rd331st36th184th49th
2015-16287th168th346th30th314th142nd348th73rd290th198th170th76th28th134th185th94th255th209th
2014-15335th197th339th186th338th118th345th237th323rd174th303rd143rd67th157th113th230th169th211th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25348th362nd--20th351st214th361st15th268th164th330th300th224th259th289th24th249th143rd
2023-24256th356th--58th154th222nd254th46th106th175th122nd356th360th223rd266th62nd228th160th
2022-23213th357th--42nd163rd306th139th16th353rd87th105th253rd199th56th340th23rd145th51st
2021-22133rd206th--252nd89th329th89th18th9th276th154th301st298th161st310th8th264th126th
2020-21252nd341st--298th124th262nd97th186th21st214th287th320th169th138th220th155th180th154th
2019-20291st271st--78th328th164th284th54th187th228th340th153rd118th307th215th73rd256th205th
2018-19286th303rd--93rd336th210th245th83rd198th143rd351st342nd264th293rd243rd101st178th150th
2017-18340th153rd--292nd339th171st343rd210th325th270th307th343rd327th325th119th174th236th245th
2016-17351st259th--342nd348th249th330th73rd349th347th287th346th331st330th156th27th331st295th
2015-16334th313th--157th337th186th199th131st337th217th336th113th342nd316th187th129th228th204th
2014-15333rd299th--144th338th173rd294th47th340th285th312th239th262nd293rd184th46th300th257th