TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Alabama A&M  10-22 (0.313)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.011 (360th)
Schedule Strength: 0.254 (352nd)
Record Quality: -0.423 (350th)
Avg. Season Rank: 353.69 (357th)
Pace: 69.08 (45th)
Momentum: -3.43 (317th)
Off. Momentum: -1.87 (303rd)
Def. Momentum: -1.56 (254th)
Consistency: -9.39 (178th)
Res. Consistency: -11.34 (90th)
Away From Home: -2.18 (322nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.23 (334th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.05 26.87 66.67 83.80 38.14 32.88 31.07 21.53 30.98 29.40 51.28 13.16 14.33 5.61 39.23 25.69 35.08 2.04
RANK: 360th 193rd 334th 327th 360th 209th 318th 188th 352nd 274th 353rd 128th 199th 221st 166th 160th 240th 225th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 118.36 35.17 -- 82.62 48.55 34.24 39.06 16.77 39.58 31.61 63.58 13.85 15.13 6.65 41.45 20.29 38.26 2.03
RANK: 348th 362nd -- 20th 349th 213th 361st 15th 268th 165th 330th 299th 224th 258th 288th 24th 249th 143rd

ANALYSIS:
Alabama A&M is a poor basketball team, arguably one of the very worst in all of college hoops. Ranked fifth from the bottom overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 10-22. They are also ranked by this site as the #10 team (out of 12) in the SWAC (average ranking 318.6). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.254 (which ranks 352nd in the nation), Alabama A&M has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

Alabama A&M has a very tough time coming by points on offense. Scoring about 92 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are woefully ranked #360 in offensive efficiency. Alabama A&M is a lousy shooting team, incapable of converting efficiently from anyplace on the floor and ranking in the bottom-50 in each of our four most noteworthy field goal shooting categories. They make just 31.1% of their three-pointers (ranking 318th nationally), 31.0% of their mid-range attempts (352nd), 51.3% of their near-proximity chances (353rd), and 38.1% of their total shots from the field (fifth from the bottom) vs. AO. Alabama A&M is also not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 66.7% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #334 overall in free throw percentage.

Alabama A&M doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 118 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #348 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Alabama A&M fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 35.17 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #362 in the country in that category. Alabama A&M also allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 39.1% of their three-pointers (fourth from the bottom in the nation), 63.6% of their near-proximity attempts (330th), and 48.6% of their total shots from the field (349th). If Alabama A&M does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 82.62 vs. AO, which ranks 20th-best in college basketball.

Alabama A&M has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 317th in the country in positive momentum. When playing on the road, Alabama A&M performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 322nd in our site's away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Alabama A&M usually performs worse than average. Alabama A&M is more efficient than normal 11% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.12%. In all other contests, Alabama A&M performs better than average 75% of the time.
Alabama A&M is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.49%, Alabama A&M performs above their norm 77% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, Alabama A&M often performs better than normal. Alabama A&M is more efficient than usual 70% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.93. In their other contests, Alabama A&M performs better than the norm 22% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25360th360th319th350thSWAC45th178th352nd334th322nd357th
2023-24326th326th308th320thSWAC54th62nd329th353rd312th352nd
2022-23304th304th230th306thSWAC187th131st339th31st133rd325th
2021-22312th312th261st285thSWAC148th11th350th288th204th324th
2020-21348th348th247th335thSWAC227th151st346th51st342nd345th
2019-20345th345th323rd336thSWAC134th100th343rd191st272nd343rd
2018-19346th346th347th349thSWAC280th19th334th148th257th349th
2017-18350th350th349th350thSWAC252nd319th328th296th191st347th
2016-17351st351st351st350thSWAC320th306th344th323rd284th351st
2015-16322nd322nd264th307thSWAC313th138th341st60th152nd276th
2014-15343rd343rd309th334thSWAC183rd68th347th331st212th345th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25360th193rd334th327th360th209th318th188th352nd274th353rd128th199th221st166th160th240th225th
2023-24347th42nd125th357th329th361st356th41st197th211th350th205th162nd200th359th14th120th12th
2022-23325th179th352nd226th291st334th205th22nd236th260th304th44th152nd181st329th16th246th94th
2021-22355th195th159th210th353rd357th358th12th353rd113th340th203rd129th179th356th11th104th5th
2020-21352nd341st337th119th353rd324th353rd11th303rd254th344th325th255th278th331st10th264th97th
2019-20349th301st264th182nd350th327th345th42nd347th176th342nd207th165th159th330th36th161st60th
2018-19348th352nd332nd116th335th320th326th5th314th308th250th76th290th311th332nd7th311th141st
2017-18347th334th312th240th343rd285th344th95th318th191st308th313th68th190th275th81st180th116th
2016-17336th202nd198th101st340th324th351st33rd303rd153rd319th320th161st243rd331st36th184th49th
2015-16287th168th346th30th314th142nd348th73rd290th198th170th76th28th134th185th94th255th209th
2014-15335th197th339th186th338th118th345th237th323rd174th303rd143rd67th157th113th230th169th211th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25348th362nd--20th349th213th361st15th268th165th330th299th224th258th288th24th249th143rd
2023-24256th356th--58th154th222nd254th46th106th175th122nd356th360th223rd266th62nd228th160th
2022-23213th357th--42nd163rd306th139th16th353rd87th105th253rd199th56th340th23rd145th51st
2021-22133rd206th--252nd89th329th89th18th9th276th154th301st298th161st310th8th264th126th
2020-21252nd341st--298th124th262nd97th186th21st214th287th320th169th138th220th155th180th154th
2019-20291st271st--78th328th164th284th54th187th228th340th153rd118th307th215th73rd256th205th
2018-19286th303rd--93rd336th210th245th83rd198th143rd351st342nd264th293rd243rd101st178th150th
2017-18340th153rd--292nd339th171st343rd210th325th270th307th343rd327th325th119th174th236th245th
2016-17351st259th--342nd348th249th330th73rd349th347th287th346th331st330th156th27th331st295th
2015-16334th313th--157th337th186th199th131st337th217th336th113th342nd316th187th129th228th204th
2014-15333rd299th--144th338th173rd294th47th340th285th312th239th262nd293rd184th46th300th257th