TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Cornell  13-17 (0.433)  |  Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.409 (207th)
Schedule Strength: 0.485 (181st)
Record Quality: -0.105 (226th)
Avg. Season Rank: 186.53 (185th)
Pace: 65.24 (189th)
Momentum: -3.60 (318th)
Off. Momentum: -1.90 (315th)
Def. Momentum: -1.70 (240th)
Consistency: -11.20 (334th)
Res. Consistency: -12.56 (235th)
Away From Home: -0.31 (203rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.74 (164th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.41 28.58 75.21 79.69 38.72 30.67 30.02 23.32 32.96 25.69 54.33 10.64 11.82 4.68 38.49 29.27 32.24 2.06
RANK: 302nd 179th 19th 277th 323rd 77th 325th 246th 278th 281st 281st 214th 320th 336th 60th 226th 271st 294th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.16 30.91 -- 81.61 40.46 29.16 33.59 25.23 34.92 27.22 52.97 9.86 16.55 5.40 35.73 30.92 33.35 2.02
RANK: 99th 243rd -- 153rd 57th 232nd 107th 163rd 148th 126th 34th 61st 270th 43rd 241st 175th 124th 113th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Cornell is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Carrying a record of 13-17, they are currently rated #207 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of eight) in the Ivy League (average ranking 181.4).

Cornell has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #99 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 97 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cornell has done a really good job this year to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. They are ranked 34th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 53.0% of their attempts from close-up. Cornell is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 5.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 43rd in the NCAA).

Unfortunately, Cornell is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 302nd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 92 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cornell does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 4.7% of all second-chance opportunities (336th nationally), and with a rating of 11.82, they're 320th in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well. Cornell also won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 325th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 30.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 38.7% of their total attempts vs. AO. If Cornell does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's outstanding shooting at the charity stripe. The squad makes 75.2% of their free throw attempts, which ranks #19 in Division I.

Cornell has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 318th in the country in positive momentum. Cornell has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 334th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Cornell performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.68%, Cornell is more efficient than normal 58% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 20% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25105th105th103rd145thIvy League35th342nd178th324th178th129th
2023-24116th116th31st77thIvy League26th28th155th62nd149th119th
2022-23145th145th110th134thIvy League19th115th157th274th157th137th
2021-22195th195th142nd175thIvy League6th24th212th143rd256th211th
2020-21198th198th--170thIvy League169th--------194th
2019-20274th274th325th322ndIvy League311th240th182nd145th309th278th
2018-19201st201st203rd196thIvy League153rd346th153rd137th196th234th
2017-18250th250th242nd226thIvy League131st202nd208th260th270th265th
2016-17275th274th310th293rdIvy League85th73rd139th219th122nd275th
2015-16281st281st271st254thIvy League29th140th160th327th96th268th
2014-15207th206th227th226thIvy League189th334th181st164th203rd185th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2533rd248th37th254th19th9th14th352nd9th240th39th161st311th225th6th352nd230th343rd
2023-2467th264th151st201st43rd9th170th360th50th125th15th24th273rd277th7th360th116th316th
2022-2381st218th183rd122nd107th4th178th361st279th76th64th2nd280th201st6th362nd93rd312th
2021-22180th152nd199th339th131st29th164th357th46th180th150th44th351st336th8th354th106th312th
2020-21178th177th215th245th141st121st216th246th104th229th119th245th339th267th94th238th205th253rd
2019-20202nd261st136th309th108th130th157th141st18th331st67th321st316th350th87th106th314th311th
2018-19229th219th137th340th141st104th190th336th298th185th92nd336th341st319th51st328th106th232nd
2017-18158th153rd75th305th118th111th210th265th17th252nd156th274th290th315th77th249th205th265th
2016-17259th326th227th294th169th42nd225th334th246th184th115th323rd323rd315th25th332nd137th278th
2015-16300th258th277th281st282nd67th220th252nd215th302nd288th49th290th343rd53rd238th279th312th
2014-15302nd179th19th277th323rd77th325th246th278th281st281st214th320th336th60th226th271st294th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25261st193rd--243rd262nd151st255th265th229th184th282nd235th73rd111th127th256th164th205th
2023-24149th219th--283rd126th280th145th95th193rd274th94th86th334th325th256th61st241st175th
2022-23245th215th--25th346th164th311th13th285th221st322nd39th28th99th251st21st303rd219th
2021-22194th303rd--72nd233rd148th84th76th340th230th194th266th224th331st190th103rd268th235th
2020-21211th163rd--267th203rd140th193rd285th249th189th171st209th65th151st102nd265th166th209th
2019-20319th261st--250th294th169th333rd296th331st113th171st165th245th216th140th285th78th146th
2018-19157th83rd--307th162nd44th114th256th264th333rd75th233rd275th136th15th221st319th338th
2017-18326th173rd--334th262nd131st347th207th173rd328th85th284th325th270th64th141st297th313th
2016-17289th176th--309th239th56th204th289th170th304th219th299th308th301st27th250th268th316th
2015-16281st175th--283rd215th166th226th123rd113th315th179th48th343rd280th118th91st298th289th
2014-1599th243rd--153rd57th232nd107th163rd148th126th34th61st270th43rd241st175th124th113th