Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Columbia12-15 (0.444) | Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.248 (274th)
Schedule Strength: 0.367 (266th)
Record Quality: -0.153 (256th)
Avg. Season Rank: 214.62 (216th)
Pace: 69.90 (18th)
Momentum: -6.12 (353rd)
Off. Momentum: -4.52 (357th)
Def. Momentum: -1.60 (255th)
Consistency: -9.99 (242nd)
Res. Consistency: -14.84 (311th)
Away From Home: -2.40 (332nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.24 (201st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
106.40
69.63
25.51
73.82
86.63
37.95
43.81
35.02
11.66
33.31
17.76
6.22
35.04
33.85
20.07
59.28
12.31
14.04
5.77
40.42
20.51
39.07
2.01
RANK:
204th
24th
246th
119th
204th
194th
174th
134th
169th
220th
284th
299th
266th
108th
114th
159th
170th
207th
201st
130th
287th
106th
166th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
116.25
70.16
23.50
--
88.89
42.89
48.24
34.32
13.12
38.24
22.21
9.10
40.98
32.36
20.66
63.84
11.64
13.15
6.57
38.61
24.99
36.40
2.02
RANK:
324th
348th
48th
--
260th
346th
343rd
220th
328th
350th
223rd
294th
305th
197th
286th
338th
139th
70th
252nd
182nd
206th
167th
166th
ANALYSIS: If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Columbia likely fits the bill. Their record this season is 12-15, and the club is ranked 274th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the eight schools in the Ivy League (average ranking 191.8), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.
Columbia does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #324 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 116 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Columbia allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 38.2% of their three-pointers (350th in the nation), 63.8% of their near-proximity attempts (338th), and 48.2% of their total shots from the field (343rd). If Columbia does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 23.50 vs. AO, which ranks 48th-best in the country.
Even though the team ranks considerably higher in offensive efficiency, Columbia isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Scoring roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #204 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Columbia has some difficulties converting mid-range shot attempts. The team is ranked 266th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 35.0% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO.
Columbia has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 353rd in positive momentum because of it. When playing on the road, Columbia performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 332nd in our site's away-from-home metric.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Columbia performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 102.44, Columbia is more efficient than normal 24% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 88% of the time.
When playing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Columbia usually performs worse than average. Columbia is more efficient than normal 25% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 54.94%. In all other contests, Columbia performs better than average 78% of the time.
Columbia is typically better vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.66%, Columbia performs above their norm 78% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.