TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 New Mexico St.  9-15 (0.375)  |  WAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.381 (225th)
Schedule Strength: 0.536 (111th)
Record Quality: -0.134 (253rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 185.28 (185th)
Pace: 69.85 (65th)
Momentum: -0.14 (184th)
Off. Momentum: -0.66 (255th)
Def. Momentum: 0.52 (105th)
Consistency: -8.17 (49th)
Res. Consistency: -13.27 (257th)
Away From Home: 0.03 (105th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.38 (72nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.67 27.59 69.01 82.42 43.27 30.39 33.91 22.87 36.09 29.16 58.64 11.34 13.81 4.46 36.87 27.75 35.38 2.01
RANK: 216th 81st 285th 280th 213th 221st 182nd 220th 273rd 190th 184th 139th 197th 276th 181st 194th 163rd 168th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.13 25.49 -- 81.35 45.09 36.30 36.98 22.22 42.62 22.83 60.39 8.77 13.03 5.95 44.62 27.32 28.06 2.17
RANK: 217th 194th -- 54th 238th 347th 319th 111th 343rd 3rd 232nd 40th 103rd 266th 353rd 147th 4th 7th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, New Mexico St. is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Carrying a record of 9-15, they are currently rated #225 overall (out of 363) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 13) in the WAC (average ranking 162.9).

Defensively, New Mexico St. finds itself in the lower half of our ratings. The team is ranked 217th in defensive efficiency, giving up more than 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. New Mexico St. performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked 343rd nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 42.6% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. New Mexico St. also does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 319th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.0% of their attempts from afar. And to expose that weakness, AO will gladly launch the three all day and all night. Of AO's total field goals, a large chunk of them (44.6%) will be from long-distance.

New Mexico St. doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #216 in the nation in offensive efficiency. New Mexico St. isn't performing well from the free throw line this season. Converting just 69.0% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #285 overall in free throw percentage. If New Mexico St. does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 8.77 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 40th in the college game.

New Mexico St. is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 49th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, New Mexico St. often performs better than normal. New Mexico St. is more efficient than usual 69% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.34. In their other contests, New Mexico St. performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
New Mexico St. does better vs. clubs that favor a faster tempo. When playing squads that have a pace vs. AO greater than 68.49, New Mexico St. performs above average 69% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
New Mexico St. performs better against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.78, New Mexico St. is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 39% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25129th129th164th151stConference USA342nd359th123rd73rd128th184th
2023-24277th277th271st260thConference USA305th73rd133rd242nd341st247th
2022-23225th225th280th253rdWAC65th49th111th72nd105th185th
2021-2274th74th12th29thWAC278th318th127th30th177th99th
2020-21148th147th112th195thWAC339th160th218th272nd157th131st
2019-2099th98th10th65thWAC343rd272nd254th169th127th135th
2018-1941st41st5th34thWAC291st148th240th221st211th49th
2017-1866th66th9th35thWAC127th39th172nd133rd106th64th
2016-1783rd83rd16th48thWAC183rd284th256th248th256th109th
2015-16107th106th65th114thWAC289th69th247th322nd180th120th
2014-15105th105th60th123rdWAC260th82nd271st290th247th92nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25204th130th327th18th297th204th275th32nd322nd213th167th166th96th210th265th46th280th180th
2023-24255th214th296th99th275th224th288th45th158th304th236th289th150th229th242nd46th316th240th
2022-23216th81st285th280th213th221st182nd220th273rd190th184th139th197th276th181st194th163rd168th
2021-2290th155th280th121st101st71st126th219th211th251st38th274th154th110th80th222nd265th298th
2020-21122nd220th201st16th271st3rd292nd308th258th247th92nd248th28th134th3rd330th299th351st
2019-2091st280th212th40th160th12th116th328th297th123rd117th167th87th145th20th336th164th300th
2018-1928th72nd269th69th71st12th180th350th306th48th34th272nd41st36th14th350th63rd247th
2017-18119th301st337th8th126th102nd184th198th299th44th71st165th66th78th159th245th93rd129th
2016-1763rd42nd155th212th60th171st154th244th103rd95th72nd273rd73rd74th160th254th88th149th
2015-16177th215th285th152nd103rd335th196th20th125th164th81st345th38th59th335th17th179th48th
2014-1598th54th83rd245th61st348th111th124th247th15th99th205th9th1st348th101st8th4th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2583rd290th--165th45th331st15th155th203rd46th108th62nd48th50th327th165th48th31st
2023-24266th345th--162nd153rd321st228th92nd71st102nd237th297th302nd132nd333rd87th110th52nd
2022-23217th194th--54th238th347th319th111th343rd3rd232nd40th103rd266th353rd147th4th7th
2021-2260th139th--178th27th320th35th167th209th42nd38th239th38th25th324th168th41st28th
2020-21204th139th--162nd220th203rd203rd309th254th36th297th79th116th241st218th314th32nd61st
2019-20119th99th--41st228th198th188th248th220th14th335th95th15th19th255th295th21st32nd
2018-1995th131st--91st110th215th91st265th180th37th198th6th6th79th250th286th42nd50th
2017-1835th132nd--55th63rd60th50th269th213th93rd37th9th27th39th94th294th118th178th
2016-17122nd172nd--193rd166th46th33rd277th169th224th222nd62nd293rd279th39th277th218th281st
2015-1642nd52nd--313th33rd157th55th347th95th45th61st143rd145th51st95th343rd16th94th
2014-15112th38th--207th199th16th157th335th168th258th209th77th131st85th8th334th243rd319th