TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 New Mexico St.  23-11 (0.676)  |  WAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.703 (105th)
Schedule Strength: 0.404 (271st)
Record Quality: 0.099 (123rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 95.88 (92nd)
Pace: 64.18 (260th)
Momentum: -1.68 (259th)
Off. Momentum: -0.60 (256th)
Def. Momentum: -1.08 (195th)
Consistency: -8.48 (82nd)
Res. Consistency: -10.83 (122nd)
Away From Home: -0.71 (247th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.58 (290th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.62 32.16 72.16 80.36 45.69 19.52 35.72 27.23 33.70 33.61 61.20 10.73 21.10 11.88 24.29 33.88 41.83 1.82
RANK: 98th 54th 83rd 245th 61st 348th 111th 124th 247th 15th 99th 205th 9th 1st 348th 101st 8th 4th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.13 24.63 -- 83.01 44.18 22.28 34.48 30.31 35.32 30.43 60.10 10.14 14.65 5.85 26.84 36.51 36.65 1.90
RANK: 112th 38th -- 207th 199th 16th 157th 335th 168th 258th 209th 77th 131st 85th 8th 334th 243rd 319th

ANALYSIS:
New Mexico St. is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Carrying a record of 23-11, they are currently rated #105 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of eight) in the WAC (average ranking 261.1).

New Mexico St. succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 98th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. New Mexico St. does an outstanding job finishing any scoring chances they obtain from offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 11.9% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked first nationally), and with a rating of 21.10, they're ninth in potential points scored off of the offensive glass as well. New Mexico St. will also routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is eighth in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to get to the inside, they are undoubtedly capable of making you pay. Presently rated in the top-100 in near-proximity shooting percentage, they make roughly 61.2% of their attempts from short-distance vs. AO.

New Mexico St. plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 112th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 98 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. New Mexico St. does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 24.63 vs. AO, they are currently rated 38th in the country in that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, New Mexico St. often performs worse than normal. New Mexico St. is more efficient than usual 25% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.21. In their other contests, New Mexico St. performs better than the norm 81% of the time.
New Mexico St. does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.11%, New Mexico St. performs above average 32% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 85% of the time.
New Mexico St. performs worse against squads that find ways to get to the free throw line. When facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 30.01, New Mexico St. is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 68% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25129th129th164th151stConference USA342nd359th123rd73rd128th184th
2023-24277th277th271st260thConference USA305th73rd133rd242nd341st247th
2022-23225th225th280th253rdWAC65th49th111th72nd105th185th
2021-2274th74th12th29thWAC278th318th127th30th177th99th
2020-21148th147th112th195thWAC339th160th218th272nd157th131st
2019-2099th98th10th65thWAC343rd272nd254th169th127th135th
2018-1941st41st5th34thWAC291st148th240th221st211th49th
2017-1866th66th9th35thWAC127th39th172nd133rd106th64th
2016-1783rd83rd16th48thWAC183rd284th256th248th256th109th
2015-16107th106th65th114thWAC289th69th247th322nd180th120th
2014-15105th105th60th123rdWAC260th82nd271st290th247th92nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25204th130th327th18th297th204th275th32nd322nd213th167th166th96th210th265th46th280th180th
2023-24255th214th296th99th275th224th288th45th158th304th236th289th150th229th242nd46th316th240th
2022-23216th81st285th280th213th221st182nd220th273rd190th184th139th197th276th181st194th163rd168th
2021-2290th155th280th121st101st71st126th219th211th251st38th274th154th110th80th222nd265th298th
2020-21122nd220th201st16th271st3rd292nd308th258th247th92nd248th28th134th3rd330th299th351st
2019-2091st280th212th40th160th12th116th328th297th123rd117th167th87th145th20th336th164th300th
2018-1928th72nd269th69th71st12th180th350th306th48th34th272nd41st36th14th350th63rd247th
2017-18119th301st337th8th126th102nd184th198th299th44th71st165th66th78th159th245th93rd129th
2016-1763rd42nd155th212th60th171st154th244th103rd95th72nd273rd73rd74th160th254th88th149th
2015-16177th215th285th152nd103rd335th196th20th125th164th81st345th38th59th335th17th179th48th
2014-1598th54th83rd245th61st348th111th124th247th15th99th205th9th1st348th101st8th4th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2583rd290th--165th45th331st15th155th203rd46th108th62nd48th50th327th165th48th31st
2023-24266th345th--162nd153rd321st228th92nd71st102nd237th297th302nd132nd333rd87th110th52nd
2022-23217th194th--54th238th347th319th111th343rd3rd232nd40th103rd266th353rd147th4th7th
2021-2260th139th--178th27th320th35th167th209th42nd38th239th38th25th324th168th41st28th
2020-21204th139th--162nd220th203rd203rd309th254th36th297th79th116th241st218th314th32nd61st
2019-20119th99th--41st228th198th188th248th220th14th335th95th15th19th255th295th21st32nd
2018-1995th131st--91st110th215th91st265th180th37th198th6th6th79th250th286th42nd50th
2017-1835th132nd--55th63rd60th50th269th213th93rd37th9th27th39th94th294th118th178th
2016-17122nd172nd--193rd166th46th33rd277th169th224th222nd62nd293rd279th39th277th218th281st
2015-1642nd52nd--313th33rd157th55th347th95th45th61st143rd145th51st95th343rd16th94th
2014-15112th38th--207th199th16th157th335th168th258th209th77th131st85th8th334th243rd319th