Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Rutgers 16-12 (0.571) | Big Ten

All-Play Percentage: 0.862 (50^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.801 (16^th)	Record Quality: 0.287 (47^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 42.60 (41^st)
Pace: 68.58 (242^nd)	Momentum: -1.18 (230^th)	Off. Momentum: -1.30 (277^th)	Def. Momentum: 0.12 (134^th)
Consistency: -8.92 (143^rd)	Res. Consistency: -10.66 (93^rd)	Away From Home: -1.42 (292^nd)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.38 (91^st)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

104.58

23.99

63.22

84.43

47.33

29.23

32.47

23.99

46.07

31.22

62.21

15.13

13.30

5.99

34.62

28.41

36.97

1.98

RANK:

89^th

199^th

345^th

69^th

35^th

230^th

249^th

147^th

11^th

53^rd

80^th

21^st

145^th

80^th

264^th

174^th

81^st

75^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

90.90

24.07

83.48

39.01

28.78

30.14

26.18

32.09

28.52

54.31

12.76

16.15

5.15

34.48

31.36

34.16

2.00

RANK:

27^th

152^nd

241^st

14^th

103^rd

18^th

304^th

12^th

191^st

49^th

287^th

339^th

206^th

73^rd

294^th

178^th

242^nd

ANALYSIS:
This website places Rutgers in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 50th overall (out of 357) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 16-12. Of the 14 schools in the Big Ten (average ranking 44.1), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.801 (which ranks 16th nationally), Rutgers is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

Rutgers will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 27th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Rutgers will put a good dent in the shooting percentages of several opponents, considering the team ranks in the top-50 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. Though they're most successful defending the mid-range jumper (allowing 32.1% shooting in that category vs. AO, 12th in the country), the team also hassles AO into converting just 30.1% of their three-pointers (18th), 54.3% of their near-proximity chances (49th), and 39.0% of their total shots from the field (14th). Rutgers also thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked 21st in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 15.13. If Rutgers does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's difficulties stopping opponents from obtaining second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 16.15 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 19th-worst in college hoops.

Rutgers is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 89th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Rutgers is superb at converting jumpers in between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 11th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 46.1% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. The squad likewise lands in the top-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, making good on about 47.3% of their total attempts vs. AO. Rutgers also does a pretty decent job in most cases to maximize opportunities to score on offense. The team is ranked 69th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 84.43 vs. AO. If Rutgers does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 63.2% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 13th-worst in Division I.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Wed 11/25/2020	vs Sacred Heart₃₁₂	W 77.75 - 56.09	W 86-63	1-0	114.99	119.26	▲ 4.27	86.03	90.85	▼ 4.82	▼ 0.55
Fri 11/27/2020	vs Fair. Dickinson₂₈₆	W 82.92 - 61.92	W 96-75	2-0	114.08	119.60	▲ 5.52	89.66	93.05	▼ 3.39	▲ 2.13
Sun 11/29/2020	vs Hofstra₁₇₀	W 76.81 - 63.66	W 70-56	3-0	109.29	86.90	▼ 22.39	93.96	73.66	▲ 20.30	▼ 2.09
Tue 12/8/2020	vs Syracuse₃₆	W 68.89 - 68.53	W 79-69	4-0	98.71	109.13	▲ 10.42	102.01	97.91	▲ 4.10	▲ 14.52
Mon 12/14/2020	@ Maryland₄₅	L 63.26 - 66.74	W 74-60	5-0	99.41	111.23	▲ 11.82	100.97	90.17	▲ 10.80	▲ 22.62
Sun 12/20/2020	vs Illinois₅	L 66.42 - 73.24	W 91-88	6-0	93.24	120.84	▲ 27.60	106.34	122.69	▼ 16.35	▲ 11.25
Wed 12/23/2020	@ Ohio State₁₁	L 65.38 - 74.27	L 68-80	6-1	100.29	96.26	▼ 4.03	109.16	106.43	▲ 2.73	▼ 1.30
Tue 12/29/2020	vs Purdue₂₉	L 66.01 - 66.45	W 81-76	7-1	98.01	122.48	▲ 24.47	102.65	120.89	▼ 18.24	▲ 6.23
Sat 1/2/2021	vs Iowa₉	L 70.87 - 76.24	L 75-77	7-2	99.70	102.03	▲ 2.33	111.15	112.14	▼ 0.99	▲ 1.34
Tue 1/5/2021	@ Michigan State₆₂	L 64.67 - 66.85	L 45-68	7-3	97.14	67.71	▼ 29.43	96.22	94.69	▲ 1.53	▼ 27.90
Sat 1/9/2021	vs Ohio State₁₁	L 68.01 - 71.41	L 68-79	7-4	100.29	100.99	▲ 0.70	109.16	124.01	▼ 14.85	▼ 14.15
Fri 1/15/2021	vs Wisconsin₁₈	L 62.34 - 64.39	L 54-60	7-5	94.06	79.68	▼ 14.38	101.01	93.05	▲ 7.96	▼ 6.42
Thu 1/21/2021	@ Penn State₃₉	L 66.06 - 71.07	L 67-75	7-6	98.07	99.24	▲ 1.17	101.40	103.50	▼ 2.10	▼ 0.93
Sun 1/24/2021	@ Indiana₅₉	L 63.52 - 65.46	W 74-70	8-6	97.19	114.26	▲ 17.07	96.16	103.92	▼ 7.76	▲ 9.31
Thu 1/28/2021	vs Michigan State₆₂	W 67.35 - 63.98	W 67-37	9-6	97.14	97.86	▲ 0.72	96.22	56.68	▲ 39.54	▲ 40.26
Sun 1/31/2021	@ Northwestern₉₅	W 65.31 - 64.33	W 64-56	10-6	97.62	92.14	▼ 5.48	92.56	76.12	▲ 16.44	▲ 10.96
Thu 2/4/2021	vs Minnesota₈₂	W 70.76 - 65.19	W 76-72	11-6	99.72	113.01	▲ 13.29	95.15	109.20	▼ 14.05	▼ 0.76
Wed 2/10/2021	@ Iowa₉	L 68.12 - 79.16	L 66-79	11-7	99.70	102.14	▲ 2.44	111.15	118.50	▼ 7.35	▼ 4.91
Sat 2/13/2021	vs Northwestern₉₅	W 68.02 - 61.49	W 64-50	12-7	97.62	94.36	▼ 3.26	92.56	78.70	▲ 13.86	▲ 10.60
Thu 2/18/2021	@ Michigan₃	L 59.32 - 72.74	L 64-71	12-8	91.56	94.07	▲ 2.51	107.56	107.54	▲ 0.02	▲ 2.53
Sun 2/21/2021	vs Maryland₄₅	W 65.83 - 64.02	L 59-68	12-9	99.41	85.92	▼ 13.49	100.97	104.78	▼ 3.81	▼ 17.30
Wed 2/24/2021	vs Indiana₅₉	W 66.16 - 62.79	W 74-63	13-9	97.19	108.97	▲ 11.78	96.16	81.19	▲ 14.97	▲ 26.75
Mon 3/1/2021	@ Nebraska₁₁₀	W 68.38 - 65.99	L 51-72	13-10	97.23	70.06	▼ 27.17	90.23	122.39	▼ 32.16	▼ 59.33
Sat 3/6/2021	@ Minnesota₈₂	L 68.00 - 68.15	W 77-70 (OT)	14-10	99.72	92.14	▼ 7.58	95.15	86.59	▲ 8.56	▲ 0.98
Thu 3/11/2021	vs Indiana₅₉ *	W 64.84 - 64.12	W 61-50	15-10	97.19	98.39	▲ 1.20	96.16	78.13	▲ 18.03	▲ 19.23
Fri 3/12/2021	vs Illinois₅ *	L 65.04 - 74.68	L 68-90	15-11	93.24	96.72	▲ 3.48	106.34	131.75	▼ 25.41	▼ 21.93
Fri 3/19/2021	vs Clemson₇₀ *	W 62.20 - 60.31	W 60-56	16-11	96.03	92.31	▼ 3.72	93.67	90.32	▲ 3.35	▼ 0.37
Sun 3/21/2021	vs Houston₄ *	L 60.82 - 70.15	L 60-63	16-12	94.64	96.77	▲ 2.13	108.19	100.00	▲ 8.19	▲ 10.32
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that prefer the outside shot, Rutgers often performs worse than normal. Rutgers is more efficient than usual 33% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In their other contests, Rutgers performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
	Rutgers does better vs. clubs that shoot the ball well from the field. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 45.43%, Rutgers performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
	Rutgers performs worse against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 82.10, Rutgers is more efficient than normal 37% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 78% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	After 30 Years, Rutgers Finds Its Way Back to the N.C.A.A. Tournament (3/21/2021 12:01:09 AM) Steve Pikiell revived the Rutgers men's basketball program using a trusted blueprint borrowed from his former UConn coach, John Calhoun.
	Rutgers’ long-sought March Madness win came in most fitting way possible (3/20/2021 4:40:14 AM) The clinching play proceeded perfectly according to plan, at least in the context of the 39 minutes and 50 seconds that had preceded it. Geo Baker had the ball in his hands, Rutgers was up a deuce, the clock was running down, and the Scarlet Knights were desp…
	Geo Baker speaks loudly, lifts Rutgers past Clemson 60-56 (3/20/2021 1:00:26 AM) Geo Baker spent part of this week using his voice to raise awareness about inequities in college sports.
	Rutgers beats Clemson for first NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament victory in 38 years (3/20/2021 12:40:02 AM) Rutgers picked up its first NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament in 38 years on Friday night when the Scarlet Knights defeated Clemson, 60-56.
	Rutgers March Madness: Half a world away, Steve Pikiell's biggest fan is tuning in (3/19/2021 9:05:16 AM) The Rutgers coach has Jameel Warney to thank for his rise to prominence. The feeling is definitely mutual.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	72	0.804	15-17 (0.469)	0.469	0.125	Big Ten	67.63	-7.82	0.724	1.15	-0.06	81.80
2023-24	121	0.668	15-17 (0.469)	0.469	0.113	Big Ten	68.26	-8.46	0.683	-1.82	-2.11	94.15
2022-23	52	0.859	19-15 (0.559)	0.559	0.220	Big Ten	66.60	-8.94	0.662	-3.43	-2.09	38.42
2021-22	63	0.829	18-14 (0.563)	0.563	0.223	Big Ten	66.32	-11.18	0.650	3.25	-1.09	89.13
2020-21	50	0.862	16-12 (0.571)	0.571	0.287	Big Ten	68.58	-8.92	0.801	0.38	-1.42	42.60
2019-20	24	0.935	20-11 (0.645)	0.645	0.291	Big Ten	68.75	-9.53	0.711	0.27	-2.53	38.63
2018-19	84	0.764	14-17 (0.452)	0.452	0.113	Big Ten	67.76	-11.12	0.732	-0.51	-1.31	99.80
2017-18	121	0.657	15-19 (0.441)	0.441	0.003	Big Ten	68.03	-8.55	0.627	-0.73	-0.94	117.46
2016-17	127	0.643	15-18 (0.455)	0.455	0.032	Big Ten	68.78	-8.88	0.659	-2.07	1.37	117.66
2015-16	288	0.180	7-25 (0.219)	0.219	-0.211	Big Ten	71.50	-8.84	0.652	-4.02	-1.79	287.23
2014-15	199	0.437	10-22 (0.313)	0.313	-0.041	Big Ten	66.42	-10.72	0.723	-0.30	0.60	179.91

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	116.79	32.16	71.43	88.39	46.74	31.53	35.50	24.65	40.08	32.21	62.84	13.81	18.54	7.96	35.68	27.88	36.44	1.99
2023-24	99.08	28.09	65.36	87.82	40.93	27.93	31.61	26.20	33.18	33.69	54.68	14.70	18.26	6.58	31.80	29.84	38.36	1.93
2022-23	104.27	26.51	69.59	86.82	44.19	27.05	33.56	26.64	35.84	33.12	59.60	14.51	18.38	8.33	31.16	30.69	38.15	1.93
2021-22	106.14	25.35	71.21	83.75	46.98	26.94	34.84	27.76	39.04	29.05	65.83	12.14	14.71	5.63	32.17	33.15	34.69	1.97
2020-21	104.58	23.99	63.22	84.43	47.33	29.23	32.47	23.99	46.07	31.22	62.21	15.13	13.30	5.99	34.62	28.41	36.97	1.98
2019-20	104.86	27.62	62.97	84.95	46.23	26.82	33.27	22.95	38.82	35.18	60.94	11.47	17.49	6.84	31.57	27.01	41.42	1.90
2018-19	105.49	28.43	64.27	86.59	44.52	30.38	33.31	20.43	33.53	35.78	60.31	13.10	16.47	6.36	35.08	23.59	41.33	1.94
2017-18	98.03	26.06	69.25	87.00	41.81	23.50	30.80	32.02	35.07	31.48	56.88	10.60	19.80	8.66	27.01	36.81	36.18	1.91
2016-17	98.24	27.15	62.02	86.75	42.49	23.89	32.17	22.65	30.79	40.20	55.21	11.21	23.79	11.01	27.54	26.11	46.34	1.81
2015-16	95.66	27.67	67.42	80.30	43.25	22.49	33.58	23.11	32.94	34.70	56.39	10.12	15.20	6.53	28.01	28.78	43.22	1.85
2014-15	95.22	27.57	65.04	82.89	41.87	25.07	31.46	31.32	35.35	26.49	59.42	9.33	15.88	7.73	30.25	37.79	31.96	1.98

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	104.84	24.13	--	87.91	43.53	33.78	34.07	20.44	34.39	33.69	58.57	9.88	16.30	7.36	38.43	23.25	38.32	2.00
2023-24	94.42	25.19	--	82.48	40.03	31.70	33.16	20.53	35.34	30.26	50.41	11.04	15.67	6.38	38.43	24.89	36.68	2.02
2022-23	89.54	21.48	--	82.38	38.98	34.47	30.51	22.61	35.08	25.30	53.99	8.87	14.07	4.32	41.84	27.45	30.71	2.11
2021-22	94.57	22.45	--	84.83	40.00	31.96	32.25	24.69	33.67	28.19	54.33	10.11	14.02	4.44	37.67	29.10	33.22	2.04
2020-21	90.90	24.07	--	83.48	39.01	28.78	30.14	26.18	32.09	28.52	54.31	12.76	16.15	5.15	34.48	31.36	34.16	2.00
2019-20	86.94	22.20	--	81.41	37.36	33.21	30.07	21.97	28.92	26.23	53.65	8.31	13.86	4.68	40.80	26.99	32.22	2.09
2018-19	98.00	26.53	--	83.81	41.12	32.13	34.79	21.16	32.24	30.52	53.93	10.78	12.03	4.46	38.34	25.25	36.41	2.02
2017-18	94.25	24.57	--	80.94	41.48	30.37	32.23	22.65	34.75	27.92	57.01	9.91	13.19	5.87	37.52	27.99	34.49	2.03
2016-17	96.63	25.96	--	83.00	40.95	31.14	31.76	20.72	36.09	31.14	53.37	12.09	14.43	5.49	37.52	24.96	37.52	2.00
2015-16	108.06	25.98	--	90.21	43.83	30.70	37.48	24.16	30.17	35.35	58.69	12.25	19.22	8.61	34.03	26.78	39.19	1.95
2014-15	98.65	26.48	--	83.41	42.33	29.94	32.69	22.28	37.42	31.19	55.09	11.88	16.27	5.70	35.89	26.71	37.40	1.98

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	72^nd	72	72^nd	72	218^th	218	110^th	110	Big Ten	Big Ten	116^th	116	8^th	8	35^th	35	27^th	27	161^st	161	80^th	80
2023-24	121^st	121	121^st	121	226^th	226	118^th	118	Big Ten	Big Ten	139^th	139	82^nd	82	43^rd	43	265^th	265	335^th	335	94^th	94
2022-23	52^nd	52	52^nd	52	147^th	147	74^th	74	Big Ten	Big Ten	255^th	255	146^th	146	55^th	55	332^nd	332	324^th	324	34^th	34
2021-22	63^rd	63	62^nd	62	148^th	148	72^nd	72	Big Ten	Big Ten	264^th	264	343^rd	343	58^th	58	2^nd	2	303^rd	303	89^th	89
2020-21	50^th	50	50^th	50	130^th	130	47^th	47	Big Ten	Big Ten	242^nd	242	143^rd	143	16^th	16	91^st	91	292^nd	292	41^st	41
2019-20	24^th	24	24^th	24	80^th	80	46^th	46	Big Ten	Big Ten	229^th	229	234^th	234	41^st	41	90^th	90	328^th	328	34^th	34
2018-19	84^th	84	84^th	84	223^rd	223	118^th	118	Big Ten	Big Ten	230^th	230	318^th	318	29^th	29	132^nd	132	292^nd	292	94^th	94
2017-18	121^st	121	121^st	121	229^th	229	173^rd	173	Big Ten	Big Ten	297^th	297	113^th	113	79^th	79	160^th	160	231^st	231	115^th	115
2016-17	127^th	127	125^th	125	223^rd	223	147^th	147	Big Ten	Big Ten	258^th	258	166^th	166	65^th	65	276^th	276	36^th	36	113^th	113
2015-16	288^th	288	288^th	288	335^th	335	277^th	277	Big Ten	Big Ten	83^rd	83	160^th	160	63^rd	63	335^th	335	321^st	321	291^st	291
2014-15	199^th	199	199^th	199	304^th	304	194^th	194	Big Ten	Big Ten	130^th	130	313^th	313	16^th	16	135^th	135	98^th	98	175^th	175

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	58^th	58	34^th	34	219^th	219	115^th	115	64^th	64	250^th	250	93^rd	93	97^th	97	79^th	79	167^th	167	62^nd	62	89^th	89	28^th	28	32^nd	32	266^th	266	100^th	100	178^th	178	123^rd	123
2023-24	282^nd	282	112^th	112	345^th	345	69^th	69	315^th	315	301^st	301	309^th	309	86^th	86	349^th	349	72^nd	72	267^th	267	42^nd	42	12^th	12	78^th	78	313^th	313	103^rd	103	101^st	101	51^st	51
2022-23	146^th	146	114^th	114	266^th	266	85^th	85	156^th	156	312^th	312	201^st	201	103^rd	103	278^th	278	55^th	55	153^rd	153	23^rd	23	11^th	11	5^th	5	323^rd	323	122^nd	122	71^st	71	31^st	31
2021-22	87^th	87	154^th	154	188^th	188	216^th	216	33^rd	33	291^st	291	95^th	95	77^th	77	107^th	107	178^th	178	19^th	19	88^th	88	95^th	95	105^th	105	283^rd	283	75^th	75	164^th	164	91^st	91
2020-21	89^th	89	199^th	199	345^th	345	69^th	69	35^th	35	230^th	230	249^th	249	147^th	147	11^th	11	53^rd	53	80^th	80	21^st	21	145^th	145	80^th	80	264^th	264	174^th	174	81^st	81	75^th	75
2019-20	65^th	65	86^th	86	341^st	341	41^st	41	38^th	38	293^rd	293	180^th	180	164^th	164	99^th	99	8^th	8	119^th	119	139^th	139	12^th	12	34^th	34	315^th	315	200^th	200	20^th	20	14^th	14
2018-19	123^rd	123	80^th	80	341^st	341	47^th	47	144^th	144	238^th	238	231^st	231	195^th	195	269^th	269	23^rd	23	147^th	147	79^th	79	46^th	46	123^rd	123	272^nd	272	213^th	213	42^nd	42	44^th	44
2017-18	237^th	237	165^th	165	270^th	270	11^th	11	279^th	279	337^th	337	334^th	334	11^th	11	263^rd	263	66^th	66	264^th	264	198^th	198	14^th	14	47^th	47	344^th	344	20^th	20	124^th	124	20^th	20
2016-17	217^th	217	189^th	189	345^th	345	8^th	8	240^th	240	335^th	335	298^th	298	209^th	209	339^th	339	1^st	1	290^th	290	137^th	137	1^st	1	2^nd	2	346^th	346	261^st	261	1^st	1	1^st	1
2015-16	269^th	269	203^rd	203	267^th	267	258^th	258	195^th	195	338^th	338	243^rd	243	210^th	210	291^st	291	16^th	16	247^th	247	218^th	218	159^th	159	186^th	186	331^st	331	200^th	200	8^th	8	7^th	7
2014-15	258^th	258	223^rd	223	303^rd	303	131^st	131	232^nd	232	267^th	267	300^th	300	27^th	27	174^th	174	260^th	260	143^rd	143	294^th	294	131^st	131	73^rd	73	277^th	277	29^th	29	281^st	281	146^th	146

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	107^th	107	70^th	70	--	--	222^nd	222	142^nd	142	187^th	187	176^th	176	142^nd	142	70^th	70	255^th	255	169^th	169	36^th	36	308^th	308	329^th	329	167^th	167	129^th	129	248^th	248	222^nd	222
2023-24	13^th	13	141^st	141	--	--	48^th	48	21^st	21	194^th	194	121^st	121	78^th	78	33^rd	33	152^nd	152	10^th	10	152^nd	152	322^nd	322	292^nd	292	247^th	247	113^th	113	201^st	201	157^th	157
2022-23	6^th	6	41^st	41	--	--	88^th	88	13^th	13	319^th	319	25^th	25	143^rd	143	54^th	54	31^st	31	34^th	34	43^rd	43	200^th	200	62^nd	62	336^th	336	156^th	156	40^th	40	25^th	25
2021-22	57^th	57	83^rd	83	--	--	198^th	198	44^th	44	238^th	238	124^th	124	191^st	191	26^th	26	142^nd	142	50^th	50	131^st	131	227^th	227	114^th	114	223^rd	223	181^st	181	127^th	127	114^th	114
2020-21	27^th	27	152^nd	152	--	--	241^st	241	14^th	14	103^rd	103	18^th	18	304^th	304	12^th	12	191^st	191	49^th	49	287^th	287	339^th	339	206^th	206	73^rd	73	294^th	294	178^th	178	242^nd	242
2019-20	6^th	6	58^th	58	--	--	151^st	151	6^th	6	280^th	280	25^th	25	153^rd	153	3^rd	3	84^th	84	34^th	34	16^th	16	242^nd	242	128^th	128	290^th	290	165^th	165	73^rd	73	61^st	61
2018-19	73^rd	73	203^rd	203	--	--	180^th	180	50^th	50	182^nd	182	181^st	181	199^th	199	36^th	36	174^th	174	35^th	35	114^th	114	58^th	58	32^nd	32	170^th	170	198^th	198	165^th	165	188^th	188
2017-18	40^th	40	104^th	104	--	--	121^st	121	46^th	46	158^th	158	27^th	27	183^rd	183	68^th	68	146^th	146	75^th	75	92^nd	92	74^th	74	78^th	78	175^th	175	207^th	207	152^nd	152	147^th	147
2016-17	66^th	66	109^th	109	--	--	232^nd	232	50^th	50	252^nd	252	31^st	31	64^th	64	138^th	138	282^nd	282	34^th	34	273^rd	273	174^th	174	56^th	56	233^rd	233	47^th	47	267^th	267	211^th	211
2015-16	282^nd	282	74^th	74	--	--	350^th	350	163^rd	163	259^th	259	298^th	298	185^th	185	9^th	9	333^rd	333	145^th	145	279^th	279	345^th	345	304^th	304	131^st	131	95^th	95	292^nd	292	286^th	286
2014-15	122^nd	122	84^th	84	--	--	231^st	231	121^st	121	262^nd	262	76^th	76	53^rd	53	247^th	247	282^nd	282	70^th	70	205^th	205	257^th	257	66^th	66	248^th	248	35^th	35	270^th	270	196^th	196