Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Rutgers 20-11 (0.645) | Big Ten

All-Play Percentage: 0.935 (24^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.711 (41^st)	Record Quality: 0.291 (46^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 38.63 (34^th)
Pace: 68.75 (229^th)	Momentum: 1.08 (128^th)	Off. Momentum: 1.79 (100^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.71 (176^th)
Consistency: -9.53 (234^th)	Res. Consistency: -11.66 (165^th)	Away From Home: -2.53 (328^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.27 (90^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

104.86

27.62

62.97

84.95

46.23

26.82

33.27

22.95

38.82

35.18

60.94

11.47

17.49

6.84

31.57

27.01

41.42

1.90

RANK:

65^th

86^th

341^st

41^st

38^th

293^rd

180^th

164^th

99^th

8^th

119^th

139^th

12^th

34^th

315^th

200^th

20^th

14^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

86.94

22.20

81.41

37.36

33.21

30.07

21.97

28.92

26.23

53.65

8.31

13.86

4.68

40.80

26.99

32.22

2.09

RANK:

6^th

58^th

151^st

6^th

280^th

25^th

153^rd

3^rd

84^th

34^th

16^th

242^nd

128^th

290^th

165^th

73^rd

61^st

ANALYSIS:
A top-25 caliber adversary, Rutgers will likely be a stiff test for any team in Division I. Haslametrics has them ranked 24th overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 20-11. Of the 14 schools in the Big Ten (average ranking 36.9), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

The Rutgers defense will be extremely problematic for most opposing offenses. Allowing about 87 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, the club is ranked sixth overall in defensive efficiency. Rutgers will put a good dent in the shooting percentages of several opponents, considering the team ranks in the top-50 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. Though they're most successful defending the mid-range jumper (allowing 28.9% shooting in that category vs. AO, third in the country), the team also hassles AO into converting just 30.1% of their three-pointers (25th), 53.7% of their near-proximity chances (34th), and 37.4% of their total shots from the field (sixth). Rutgers also makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 22.20 vs. AO, they are currently rated 58th in the country in that category.

Rutgers is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 65th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Rutgers appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 17.49 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 12th in the NCAA), and they convert 6.8% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 34th) as well. Rutgers also allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.31, which ranks #16 in the country. Rutgers will lastly routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is 20th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 60.9% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. If Rutgers does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 63.0% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 13th-worst in Division I.

When playing on the road, Rutgers performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 328th in our site's away-from-home metric.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Thu 11/7/2019	vs Bryant₂₅₅	W 77.62 - 54.76	W 73-71	1-0	108.26	86.66	▼ 21.60	81.07	88.44	▼ 7.37	▼ 28.97
Sun 11/10/2019	vs Niagara₃₁₂	W 78.70 - 52.78	W 86-39	2-0	115.14	132.03	▲ 16.89	82.33	62.94	▲ 19.39	▲ 36.28
Wed 11/13/2019	vs Drexel₂₄₅	W 76.24 - 54.38	W 62-57	3-0	109.29	90.66	▼ 18.63	82.87	87.39	▼ 4.52	▼ 23.15
Sat 11/16/2019	vs St. Bonaventure₁₃₉ *	W 70.98 - 59.78	L 74-80	3-1	106.35	113.85	▲ 7.50	89.86	125.00	▼ 35.14	▼ 27.64
Wed 11/20/2019	vs Stephen F. Austin₉₇	W 73.19 - 61.33	W 69-57	4-1	98.38	92.93	▼ 5.45	88.40	80.74	▲ 7.66	▲ 2.21
Tue 11/26/2019	vs NJIT₂₇₉	W 73.95 - 50.79	W 85-58	5-1	106.79	124.82	▲ 18.03	77.94	86.08	▼ 8.14	▲ 9.89
Fri 11/29/2019	vs UMass₁₇₉	W 74.31 - 57.01	W 82-57	6-1	105.28	104.62	▼ 0.66	86.20	78.64	▲ 7.56	▲ 6.90
Tue 12/3/2019	@ Pittsburgh₁₀₂	W 66.04 - 60.09	L 60-71	6-2	101.09	86.95	▼ 14.14	88.04	100.15	▼ 12.11	▼ 26.25
Sun 12/8/2019	@ Michigan State₃	L 62.66 - 71.82	L 65-77	6-3	93.29	89.28	▼ 4.01	101.59	101.78	▼ 0.19	▼ 4.20
Wed 12/11/2019	vs Wisconsin₂₆	W 64.02 - 60.31	W 72-65	7-3	96.17	106.64	▲ 10.47	95.47	97.54	▼ 2.07	▲ 8.40
Sat 12/14/2019	vs Seton Hall₂₈	W 69.65 - 65.64	W 68-48	8-3	96.92	94.48	▼ 2.44	96.29	68.85	▲ 27.44	▲ 25.00
Sun 12/22/2019	vs Lafayette₂₄₄	W 76.58 - 54.72	W 63-44	9-3	110.08	97.55	▼ 12.53	83.72	42.83	▲ 40.89	▲ 28.36
Mon 12/30/2019	vs Caldwell	---	W 94-49	10-3	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 1/3/2020	@ Nebraska₁₆₇	W 75.27 - 64.43	W 79-62	11-3	104.94	127.77	▲ 22.83	86.20	90.13	▼ 3.93	▲ 18.90
Tue 1/7/2020	vs Penn State₂₅	W 69.25 - 65.75	W 72-61	12-3	95.70	94.77	▼ 0.93	95.74	82.45	▲ 13.29	▲ 12.36
Sat 1/11/2020	@ Illinois₂₉	L 63.18 - 65.22	L 51-54	12-4	95.82	80.91	▼ 14.91	94.41	78.15	▲ 16.26	▲ 1.35
Wed 1/15/2020	vs Indiana₃₄	W 67.46 - 62.03	W 59-50	13-4	97.01	85.61	▼ 11.40	94.29	74.90	▲ 19.39	▲ 7.99
Sun 1/19/2020	vs Minnesota₂₁	W 67.05 - 64.23	W 64-56	14-4	96.77	106.48	▲ 9.71	97.90	89.95	▲ 7.95	▲ 17.66
Wed 1/22/2020	@ Iowa₂₀	L 68.20 - 72.01	L 80-85	14-5	99.78	113.56	▲ 13.78	100.69	115.61	▼ 14.92	▼ 1.14
Sat 1/25/2020	vs Nebraska₁₆₇	W 78.67 - 61.09	W 75-72	15-5	104.94	101.72	▼ 3.22	86.20	101.08	▼ 14.88	▼ 18.10
Tue 1/28/2020	vs Purdue₁₆	W 62.46 - 60.37	W 70-63	16-5	92.98	98.64	▲ 5.66	94.96	92.45	▲ 2.51	▲ 8.17
Sat 2/1/2020	vs Michigan₁₃ *	L 65.90 - 67.16	L 63-69	16-6	95.60	91.45	▼ 4.15	98.01	100.16	▼ 2.15	▼ 6.30
Tue 2/4/2020	@ Maryland₁₁	L 63.09 - 67.60	L 51-56	16-7	95.60	77.45	▼ 18.15	98.37	83.38	▲ 14.99	▼ 3.16
Sun 2/9/2020	vs Northwestern₁₂₀	W 70.94 - 57.77	W 77-73 (OT)	17-7	103.14	109.42	▲ 6.28	88.93	115.75	▼ 26.82	▼ 20.54
Wed 2/12/2020	@ Ohio State₇	L 61.30 - 67.52	L 66-72	17-8	93.92	99.86	▲ 5.94	98.41	110.49	▼ 12.08	▼ 6.14
Sat 2/15/2020	vs Illinois₂₉	W 66.31 - 61.93	W 72-57	18-8	95.82	108.66	▲ 12.84	94.41	88.76	▲ 5.65	▲ 18.49
Wed 2/19/2020	vs Michigan₁₃	W 67.49 - 65.48	L 52-60	18-9	95.60	81.42	▼ 14.18	98.01	97.69	▲ 0.32	▼ 13.86
Sun 2/23/2020	@ Wisconsin₂₆	L 61.00 - 63.57	L 71-79	18-10	96.17	105.35	▲ 9.18	95.47	110.41	▼ 14.94	▼ 5.76
Wed 2/26/2020	@ Penn State₂₅	L 65.98 - 69.15	L 64-65	18-11	95.70	93.55	▼ 2.15	95.74	88.78	▲ 6.96	▲ 4.81
Tue 3/3/2020	vs Maryland₁₁	W 66.22 - 64.27	W 78-67	19-11	95.60	111.40	▲ 15.80	98.37	97.76	▲ 0.61	▲ 16.41
Sat 3/7/2020	@ Purdue₁₆	L 59.42 - 63.50	W 71-68 (OT)	20-11	92.98	93.49	▲ 0.51	94.96	88.60	▲ 6.36	▲ 6.87
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Rutgers often performs worse than normal. Rutgers is more efficient than usual 33% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.70%. In their other contests, Rutgers performs better than the norm 83% of the time.
	Rutgers does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.19%, Rutgers performs above average 72% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
	Rutgers performs better against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.31, Rutgers is more efficient than normal 82% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 37% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Terps’ Slide Continues At Rutgers: What’s Gone Wrong, Silver Linings And More (3/4/2020 8:07:00 AM) After falling 78-66 to Michigan State Feb. 29, they laid an egg in Piscataway, N.J., en route to a 78-67 loss at Rutgers March 3 that wasn’t even that close. Maryland led this game for all of 52 seconds and trailed for the final 35:35. The Terps never found an offensive rhythm against Rutgers’ physical defense, consistently settling for ...
	Rutgers dominates No. 9 Maryland 78-67 to deny Terps conference title (3/3/2020 11:01:00 PM) Geo Baker scored just 11 points for Rutgers, but a steady performance from his Scarlet Knight teammates, his team was able to pull off an upset of No. 9 Maryland, who would've clinched a Big Ten regular season title with a win.
	Rutgers stuns No. 9 Maryland for school record 18th home win (3/3/2020 11:00:00 PM) PISCATAWAY, N.J. (AP) — Rutgers has inched a little closer to its first NCAA Tournament berth in almost three decades. Jacob Young came off the bench and scored 17 points and the Scarlet Knights claimed their fourth ranked victim at home with a 78-67 victory over No.
	Maryland is left searching for answers after another dud against Rutgers (3/3/2020 9:55:00 PM) PISCATAWAY, N.J. — Once the Maryland men’s basketball team prevailed against ... Their second chance evaporated Tuesday inside the sold-out Rutgers Athletic Center with a 78-67 defeat against the Scarlet Knights. All that remains for the Terps now ...
	No. 16 Penn State shoots down Rutgers on Dread’s 3 (2/27/2020 12:39:00 AM) Myles Dread capped a memorable performance with an unforgettable ending, drilling a 3-pointer with 28 seconds left to lift No. 16 Penn State to a thrilling 65-64 victory over visiting Rutgers in Big Ten Conference play on Wednesday night.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	72	0.804	15-17 (0.469)	0.469	0.125	Big Ten	67.63	-7.82	0.724	1.15	-0.06	81.80
2023-24	121	0.668	15-17 (0.469)	0.469	0.113	Big Ten	68.26	-8.46	0.683	-1.82	-2.11	94.15
2022-23	52	0.859	19-15 (0.559)	0.559	0.220	Big Ten	66.60	-8.94	0.662	-3.43	-2.09	38.42
2021-22	63	0.829	18-14 (0.563)	0.563	0.223	Big Ten	66.32	-11.18	0.650	3.25	-1.09	89.13
2020-21	50	0.862	16-12 (0.571)	0.571	0.287	Big Ten	68.58	-8.92	0.801	0.38	-1.42	42.60
2019-20	24	0.935	20-11 (0.645)	0.645	0.291	Big Ten	68.75	-9.53	0.711	0.27	-2.53	38.63
2018-19	84	0.764	14-17 (0.452)	0.452	0.113	Big Ten	67.76	-11.12	0.732	-0.51	-1.31	99.80
2017-18	121	0.657	15-19 (0.441)	0.441	0.003	Big Ten	68.03	-8.55	0.627	-0.73	-0.94	117.46
2016-17	127	0.643	15-18 (0.455)	0.455	0.032	Big Ten	68.78	-8.88	0.659	-2.07	1.37	117.66
2015-16	288	0.180	7-25 (0.219)	0.219	-0.211	Big Ten	71.50	-8.84	0.652	-4.02	-1.79	287.23
2014-15	199	0.437	10-22 (0.313)	0.313	-0.041	Big Ten	66.42	-10.72	0.723	-0.30	0.60	179.91

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	116.79	32.16	71.43	88.39	46.74	31.53	35.50	24.65	40.08	32.21	62.84	13.81	18.54	7.96	35.68	27.88	36.44	1.99
2023-24	99.08	28.09	65.36	87.82	40.93	27.93	31.61	26.20	33.18	33.69	54.68	14.70	18.26	6.58	31.80	29.84	38.36	1.93
2022-23	104.27	26.51	69.59	86.82	44.19	27.05	33.56	26.64	35.84	33.12	59.60	14.51	18.38	8.33	31.16	30.69	38.15	1.93
2021-22	106.14	25.35	71.21	83.75	46.98	26.94	34.84	27.76	39.04	29.05	65.83	12.14	14.71	5.63	32.17	33.15	34.69	1.97
2020-21	104.58	23.99	63.22	84.43	47.33	29.23	32.47	23.99	46.07	31.22	62.21	15.13	13.30	5.99	34.62	28.41	36.97	1.98
2019-20	104.86	27.62	62.97	84.95	46.23	26.82	33.27	22.95	38.82	35.18	60.94	11.47	17.49	6.84	31.57	27.01	41.42	1.90
2018-19	105.49	28.43	64.27	86.59	44.52	30.38	33.31	20.43	33.53	35.78	60.31	13.10	16.47	6.36	35.08	23.59	41.33	1.94
2017-18	98.03	26.06	69.25	87.00	41.81	23.50	30.80	32.02	35.07	31.48	56.88	10.60	19.80	8.66	27.01	36.81	36.18	1.91
2016-17	98.24	27.15	62.02	86.75	42.49	23.89	32.17	22.65	30.79	40.20	55.21	11.21	23.79	11.01	27.54	26.11	46.34	1.81
2015-16	95.66	27.67	67.42	80.30	43.25	22.49	33.58	23.11	32.94	34.70	56.39	10.12	15.20	6.53	28.01	28.78	43.22	1.85
2014-15	95.22	27.57	65.04	82.89	41.87	25.07	31.46	31.32	35.35	26.49	59.42	9.33	15.88	7.73	30.25	37.79	31.96	1.98

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	104.84	24.13	--	87.91	43.53	33.78	34.07	20.44	34.39	33.69	58.57	9.88	16.30	7.36	38.43	23.25	38.32	2.00
2023-24	94.42	25.19	--	82.48	40.03	31.70	33.16	20.53	35.34	30.26	50.41	11.04	15.67	6.38	38.43	24.89	36.68	2.02
2022-23	89.54	21.48	--	82.38	38.98	34.47	30.51	22.61	35.08	25.30	53.99	8.87	14.07	4.32	41.84	27.45	30.71	2.11
2021-22	94.57	22.45	--	84.83	40.00	31.96	32.25	24.69	33.67	28.19	54.33	10.11	14.02	4.44	37.67	29.10	33.22	2.04
2020-21	90.90	24.07	--	83.48	39.01	28.78	30.14	26.18	32.09	28.52	54.31	12.76	16.15	5.15	34.48	31.36	34.16	2.00
2019-20	86.94	22.20	--	81.41	37.36	33.21	30.07	21.97	28.92	26.23	53.65	8.31	13.86	4.68	40.80	26.99	32.22	2.09
2018-19	98.00	26.53	--	83.81	41.12	32.13	34.79	21.16	32.24	30.52	53.93	10.78	12.03	4.46	38.34	25.25	36.41	2.02
2017-18	94.25	24.57	--	80.94	41.48	30.37	32.23	22.65	34.75	27.92	57.01	9.91	13.19	5.87	37.52	27.99	34.49	2.03
2016-17	96.63	25.96	--	83.00	40.95	31.14	31.76	20.72	36.09	31.14	53.37	12.09	14.43	5.49	37.52	24.96	37.52	2.00
2015-16	108.06	25.98	--	90.21	43.83	30.70	37.48	24.16	30.17	35.35	58.69	12.25	19.22	8.61	34.03	26.78	39.19	1.95
2014-15	98.65	26.48	--	83.41	42.33	29.94	32.69	22.28	37.42	31.19	55.09	11.88	16.27	5.70	35.89	26.71	37.40	1.98

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	72^nd	72	72^nd	72	218^th	218	110^th	110	Big Ten	Big Ten	116^th	116	8^th	8	35^th	35	27^th	27	161^st	161	80^th	80
2023-24	121^st	121	121^st	121	226^th	226	118^th	118	Big Ten	Big Ten	139^th	139	82^nd	82	43^rd	43	265^th	265	335^th	335	94^th	94
2022-23	52^nd	52	52^nd	52	147^th	147	74^th	74	Big Ten	Big Ten	255^th	255	146^th	146	55^th	55	332^nd	332	324^th	324	34^th	34
2021-22	63^rd	63	62^nd	62	148^th	148	72^nd	72	Big Ten	Big Ten	264^th	264	343^rd	343	58^th	58	2^nd	2	303^rd	303	89^th	89
2020-21	50^th	50	50^th	50	130^th	130	47^th	47	Big Ten	Big Ten	242^nd	242	143^rd	143	16^th	16	91^st	91	292^nd	292	41^st	41
2019-20	24^th	24	24^th	24	80^th	80	46^th	46	Big Ten	Big Ten	229^th	229	234^th	234	41^st	41	90^th	90	328^th	328	34^th	34
2018-19	84^th	84	84^th	84	223^rd	223	118^th	118	Big Ten	Big Ten	230^th	230	318^th	318	29^th	29	132^nd	132	292^nd	292	94^th	94
2017-18	121^st	121	121^st	121	229^th	229	173^rd	173	Big Ten	Big Ten	297^th	297	113^th	113	79^th	79	160^th	160	231^st	231	115^th	115
2016-17	127^th	127	125^th	125	223^rd	223	147^th	147	Big Ten	Big Ten	258^th	258	166^th	166	65^th	65	276^th	276	36^th	36	113^th	113
2015-16	288^th	288	288^th	288	335^th	335	277^th	277	Big Ten	Big Ten	83^rd	83	160^th	160	63^rd	63	335^th	335	321^st	321	291^st	291
2014-15	199^th	199	199^th	199	304^th	304	194^th	194	Big Ten	Big Ten	130^th	130	313^th	313	16^th	16	135^th	135	98^th	98	175^th	175

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	58^th	58	34^th	34	219^th	219	115^th	115	64^th	64	250^th	250	93^rd	93	97^th	97	79^th	79	167^th	167	62^nd	62	89^th	89	28^th	28	32^nd	32	266^th	266	100^th	100	178^th	178	123^rd	123
2023-24	282^nd	282	112^th	112	345^th	345	69^th	69	315^th	315	301^st	301	309^th	309	86^th	86	349^th	349	72^nd	72	267^th	267	42^nd	42	12^th	12	78^th	78	313^th	313	103^rd	103	101^st	101	51^st	51
2022-23	146^th	146	114^th	114	266^th	266	85^th	85	156^th	156	312^th	312	201^st	201	103^rd	103	278^th	278	55^th	55	153^rd	153	23^rd	23	11^th	11	5^th	5	323^rd	323	122^nd	122	71^st	71	31^st	31
2021-22	87^th	87	154^th	154	188^th	188	216^th	216	33^rd	33	291^st	291	95^th	95	77^th	77	107^th	107	178^th	178	19^th	19	88^th	88	95^th	95	105^th	105	283^rd	283	75^th	75	164^th	164	91^st	91
2020-21	89^th	89	199^th	199	345^th	345	69^th	69	35^th	35	230^th	230	249^th	249	147^th	147	11^th	11	53^rd	53	80^th	80	21^st	21	145^th	145	80^th	80	264^th	264	174^th	174	81^st	81	75^th	75
2019-20	65^th	65	86^th	86	341^st	341	41^st	41	38^th	38	293^rd	293	180^th	180	164^th	164	99^th	99	8^th	8	119^th	119	139^th	139	12^th	12	34^th	34	315^th	315	200^th	200	20^th	20	14^th	14
2018-19	123^rd	123	80^th	80	341^st	341	47^th	47	144^th	144	238^th	238	231^st	231	195^th	195	269^th	269	23^rd	23	147^th	147	79^th	79	46^th	46	123^rd	123	272^nd	272	213^th	213	42^nd	42	44^th	44
2017-18	237^th	237	165^th	165	270^th	270	11^th	11	279^th	279	337^th	337	334^th	334	11^th	11	263^rd	263	66^th	66	264^th	264	198^th	198	14^th	14	47^th	47	344^th	344	20^th	20	124^th	124	20^th	20
2016-17	217^th	217	189^th	189	345^th	345	8^th	8	240^th	240	335^th	335	298^th	298	209^th	209	339^th	339	1^st	1	290^th	290	137^th	137	1^st	1	2^nd	2	346^th	346	261^st	261	1^st	1	1^st	1
2015-16	269^th	269	203^rd	203	267^th	267	258^th	258	195^th	195	338^th	338	243^rd	243	210^th	210	291^st	291	16^th	16	247^th	247	218^th	218	159^th	159	186^th	186	331^st	331	200^th	200	8^th	8	7^th	7
2014-15	258^th	258	223^rd	223	303^rd	303	131^st	131	232^nd	232	267^th	267	300^th	300	27^th	27	174^th	174	260^th	260	143^rd	143	294^th	294	131^st	131	73^rd	73	277^th	277	29^th	29	281^st	281	146^th	146

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	107^th	107	70^th	70	--	--	222^nd	222	142^nd	142	187^th	187	176^th	176	142^nd	142	70^th	70	255^th	255	169^th	169	36^th	36	308^th	308	329^th	329	167^th	167	129^th	129	248^th	248	222^nd	222
2023-24	13^th	13	141^st	141	--	--	48^th	48	21^st	21	194^th	194	121^st	121	78^th	78	33^rd	33	152^nd	152	10^th	10	152^nd	152	322^nd	322	292^nd	292	247^th	247	113^th	113	201^st	201	157^th	157
2022-23	6^th	6	41^st	41	--	--	88^th	88	13^th	13	319^th	319	25^th	25	143^rd	143	54^th	54	31^st	31	34^th	34	43^rd	43	200^th	200	62^nd	62	336^th	336	156^th	156	40^th	40	25^th	25
2021-22	57^th	57	83^rd	83	--	--	198^th	198	44^th	44	238^th	238	124^th	124	191^st	191	26^th	26	142^nd	142	50^th	50	131^st	131	227^th	227	114^th	114	223^rd	223	181^st	181	127^th	127	114^th	114
2020-21	27^th	27	152^nd	152	--	--	241^st	241	14^th	14	103^rd	103	18^th	18	304^th	304	12^th	12	191^st	191	49^th	49	287^th	287	339^th	339	206^th	206	73^rd	73	294^th	294	178^th	178	242^nd	242
2019-20	6^th	6	58^th	58	--	--	151^st	151	6^th	6	280^th	280	25^th	25	153^rd	153	3^rd	3	84^th	84	34^th	34	16^th	16	242^nd	242	128^th	128	290^th	290	165^th	165	73^rd	73	61^st	61
2018-19	73^rd	73	203^rd	203	--	--	180^th	180	50^th	50	182^nd	182	181^st	181	199^th	199	36^th	36	174^th	174	35^th	35	114^th	114	58^th	58	32^nd	32	170^th	170	198^th	198	165^th	165	188^th	188
2017-18	40^th	40	104^th	104	--	--	121^st	121	46^th	46	158^th	158	27^th	27	183^rd	183	68^th	68	146^th	146	75^th	75	92^nd	92	74^th	74	78^th	78	175^th	175	207^th	207	152^nd	152	147^th	147
2016-17	66^th	66	109^th	109	--	--	232^nd	232	50^th	50	252^nd	252	31^st	31	64^th	64	138^th	138	282^nd	282	34^th	34	273^rd	273	174^th	174	56^th	56	233^rd	233	47^th	47	267^th	267	211^th	211
2015-16	282^nd	282	74^th	74	--	--	350^th	350	163^rd	163	259^th	259	298^th	298	185^th	185	9^th	9	333^rd	333	145^th	145	279^th	279	345^th	345	304^th	304	131^st	131	95^th	95	292^nd	292	286^th	286
2014-15	122^nd	122	84^th	84	--	--	231^st	231	121^st	121	262^nd	262	76^th	76	53^rd	53	247^th	247	282^nd	282	70^th	70	205^th	205	257^th	257	66^th	66	248^th	248	35^th	35	270^th	270	196^th	196