TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UNH  8-24 (0.250)  |  America East
All-Play Percentage: 0.022 (356th)
Schedule Strength: 0.283 (327th)
Record Quality: -0.453 (354th)
Avg. Season Rank: 353.80 (358th)
Pace: 67.16 (144th)
Momentum: 2.07 (88th)
Off. Momentum: -0.26 (219th)
Def. Momentum: 2.33 (47th)
Consistency: -10.77 (326th)
Res. Consistency: -11.94 (135th)
Away From Home: -1.79 (300th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.51 (239th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.21 21.90 66.26 86.43 38.68 37.63 31.43 24.93 34.60 23.87 54.39 10.36 10.02 2.74 43.54 28.84 27.62 2.16
RANK: 357th 345th 343rd 214th 354th 77th 301st 88th 283rd 360th 314th 281st 350th 362nd 66th 79th 359th 355th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 117.69 29.94 -- 88.77 47.66 33.58 34.76 22.85 42.94 32.33 64.40 14.71 17.74 7.77 37.83 25.74 36.42 2.01
RANK: 342nd 282nd -- 254th 332nd 170th 220th 242nd 346th 195th 342nd 334th 348th 343rd 149th 231st 172nd 190th

ANALYSIS:
UNH is a poor basketball team, arguably one of the very worst in all of college hoops. Haslametrics has them ranked ninth from the bottom overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 8-24. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of nine) in the America East (average ranking 276.3).

Offense comes as a real struggle to UNH this year. The team is rated eighth from the bottom in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 94 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UNH does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 2.7% of all second-chance opportunities (third from the bottom nationally), and with a rating of 10.02, they're 350th in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well. UNH is also among the worst of the worst when it comes to field goal shooting. The team is rated #354 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 38.7% of their attempts vs. AO. UNH lastly does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.90 vs. AO, they are 345th in the overall rankings for that category.

UNH doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 118 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #342 in the nation in defensive efficiency. UNH gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 17.74 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (348th nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 7.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 343rd) as well. UNH also allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. They are exceptionally deficient defending inside the three-point line, allowing AO to make good on 42.9% of their mid-range jumpers (346th in the nation), 64.4% of their near-proximity chances (342nd), and 47.7% of their total shots from the field (332nd).

UNH has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 326th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UNH does worse vs. clubs that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.97, UNH performs above average 20% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
UNH performs better against squads that prefer the outside shot. When facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.04, UNH is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 31% of the time.
When playing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, UNH usually performs worse than average. UNH is more efficient than normal 35% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.42. In all other contests, UNH performs better than average 69% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25356th356th333rd354thAmerica East144th326th327th239th300th358th
2023-24264th264th181st222ndAmerica East18th163rd260th15th67th245th
2022-23291st291st193rd244thAmerica East325th354th284th233rd356th300th
2021-22267th267th168th255thAmerica East348th186th346th158th38th242nd
2020-21255th253rd163rd239thAmerica East246th126th314th85th81st263rd
2019-20271st270th192nd250thAmerica East150th167th302nd223rd167th289th
2018-19344th344th346th350thAmerica East255th34th298th85th195th348th
2017-18293rd293rd300th310thAmerica East283rd9th279th84th37th286th
2016-17193rd193rd85th146thAmerica East306th324th269th311th45th164th
2015-16221st221st111th173rdAmerica East235th79th304th175th38th252nd
2014-15201st201st117th176thAmerica East191st40th301st23rd192nd198th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25357th345th343rd214th354th77th301st88th283rd360th314th281st350th362nd66th79th359th355th
2023-24300th325th69th268th296th31st273rd255th62nd340th295th104th340th317th21st239th328th353rd
2022-23306th205th280th66th359th25th258th204th342nd295th360th310th247th306th34th231st317th341st
2021-22210th274th337th52nd274th43rd132nd212th337th249th183rd350th149th266th59th240th284th314th
2020-21272nd61st313th196th321st156th244th256th357th91st280th295th266th240th162nd260th89th144th
2019-20313th330th317th90th334th47th236th136th233rd314th323rd347th171st274th59th154th315th324th
2018-19351st350th344th130th351st7th319th150th350th353rd348th351st301st344th7th160th353rd353rd
2017-18301st225th77th59th346th19th321st130th277th328th336th350th45th229th36th152nd337th335th
2016-17191st215th91st150th259th45th250th179th87th313th224th338th284th346th55th182nd318th324th
2015-16245th151st37th72nd337th114th254th100th246th237th348th346th242nd301st145th125th265th251st
2014-15252nd213th306th233rd244th123rd62nd203rd293rd257th268th319th220th145th104th195th244th244th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25342nd282nd--254th332nd170th220th242nd346th195th342nd334th348th343rd149th231st172nd190th
2023-24190th102nd--180th237th203rd109th247th302nd110th302nd319th78th164th198th245th114th129th
2022-23249th203rd--314th253rd54th96th272nd337th344th144th209th232nd268th27th241st323rd346th
2021-22321st177th--280th292nd210th274th284th335th164th241st86th56th72nd176th264th117th154th
2020-21232nd299th--128th252nd34th268th217th255th275th126th36th72nd41st43rd227th290th322nd
2019-20174th323rd--133rd135th41st137th299th259th149th82nd241st134th35th50th313th163rd259th
2018-19238th339th--95th258th40th165th237th259th199th253rd208th60th174th46th263rd237th276th
2017-18240th347th--85th232nd80th202nd235th181st121st276th232nd4th29th109th258th151st195th
2016-17154th115th--291st194th123rd54th246th187th279th245th153rd68th65th73rd207th244th266th
2015-16193rd163rd--268th162nd156th141st246th102nd238th201st54th167th173rd111th226th201st225th
2014-15154th298th--120th140th58th65th256th57th175th247th138th79th86th58th274th195th259th