TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Nebraska  21-14 (0.600)  |  Big Ten
All-Play Percentage: 0.857 (53rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.717 (37th)
Record Quality: 0.276 (57th)
Avg. Season Rank: 56.31 (55th)
Pace: 67.09 (149th)
Momentum: 1.80 (105th)
Off. Momentum: 2.07 (78th)
Def. Momentum: -0.27 (181st)
Consistency: -10.08 (259th)
Res. Consistency: -12.32 (168th)
Away From Home: 0.96 (44th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.02 (98th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.75 30.70 75.56 85.52 47.01 33.66 36.06 18.62 38.79 33.25 62.71 12.02 16.25 7.73 39.35 21.77 38.87 2.00
RANK: 63rd 59th 67th 257th 56th 184th 75th 261st 123rd 131st 64th 188th 102nd 40th 160th 262nd 112th 148th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.43 20.19 -- 88.67 40.20 38.79 32.86 23.35 34.63 26.53 55.82 12.16 14.61 5.43 43.75 26.33 29.92 2.14
RANK: 40th 4th -- 248th 36th 341st 110th 269th 74th 18th 77th 181st 183rd 110th 331st 251st 13th 12th

ANALYSIS:
This website places Nebraska in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 53rd overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 21-14. Of the 18 schools in the Big Ten (average ranking 41.3), they're currently ranked as our #13 team in the conference.

Nebraska has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #40 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 98 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Nebraska is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.19 vs. AO, they are currently rated fourth in the country in that category. Nebraska also boasts one of the better overall defensive field goal percentages in the country. The team ranks #36 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.2% of their total attempts from the floor.

Nebraska plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 63rd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 116 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Nebraska is one of the better teams in the country when it comes to converting scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 7.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 40th nationally). Nebraska has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 56th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 47.0% of their attempts vs. AO.

On the road, Nebraska performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 44th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Nebraska is typically worse vs. teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. Against foes that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 86.13, Nebraska performs above their norm 46% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 91% of the time.
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, Nebraska often performs better than normal. Nebraska is more efficient than usual 80% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.14. In their other contests, Nebraska performs better than the norm 45% of the time.
Nebraska does worse vs. clubs that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When playing squads that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.30%, Nebraska performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2553rd53rd123rd57thBig Ten149th259th37th98th44th55th
2023-2430th29th56th36thBig Ten78th314th58th312th347th42nd
2022-23102nd102nd193rd99thBig Ten182nd104th25th213th317th103rd
2021-22113th113th305th202ndBig Ten24th279th35th331st125th128th
2020-21110th110th312th213thBig Ten41st245th6th316th336th115th
2019-20167th167th338th245thBig Ten15th212th10th59th134th150th
2018-1936th36th163rd74thBig Ten269th291st11th353rd329th17th
2017-1853rd53rd66th39thBig Ten204th139th54th7th265th58th
2016-17110th110th264th136thBig Ten198th161st11th34th57th91st
2015-1672nd72nd201st148thBig Ten204th255th93rd329th123rd67th
2014-15107th107th241st149thBig Ten222nd105th36th127th297th102nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2563rd59th67th257th56th184th75th261st123rd131st64th188th102nd40th160th262nd112th148th
2023-2426th151st30th184th40th33rd29th276th38th272nd33rd149th208th140th30th278th275th333rd
2022-23145th191st353rd330th18th211th111th335th55th70th41st258th292nd175th146th323rd32nd100th
2021-2299th72nd66th335th36th251st197th310th94th56th50th47th316th102nd215th299th23rd61st
2020-21182nd179th346th288th89th92nd90th342nd50th115th202nd78th194th225th64th337th77th216th
2019-20185th196th348th77th179th98th212th350th340th1st257th10th122nd223rd121st351st4th52nd
2018-1922nd19th168th6th126th124th164th180th254th32nd114th18th157th159th207th224th84th104th
2017-1868th21st63rd70th155th198th190th53rd105th239th107th140th73rd144th229th66th264th181st
2016-17131st174th180th26th168th298th201st12th296th177th60th123rd12th32nd323rd28th230th81st
2015-1673rd213th46th83rd68th180th127th32nd35th315th40th11th188th135th208th39th325th257th
2014-15210th158th151st230th179th153rd329th109th28th315th75th178th274th225th141st89th311th275th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2540th4th--248th36th341st110th269th74th18th77th181st183rd110th331st251st13th12th
2023-2435th21st--322nd10th350th101st240th3rd43rd62nd144th312th137th344th196th18th11th
2022-2372nd6th--340th39th357th164th302nd57th4th115th250th243rd199th346th264th2nd4th
2021-22138th112th--217th127th292nd138th266th87th43rd282nd329th266th158th275th256th38th43rd
2020-2144th42nd--233rd30th351st19th264th119th9th170th283rd119th64th349th251st5th3rd
2019-20138th3rd--329th149th318th177th194th257th203rd136th120th336th310th263rd144th128th99th
2018-1971st105th--183rd67th109th113th290th78th138th67th1st176th125th102nd291st129th200th
2017-1825th54th--322nd32nd35th18th348th71st150th48th47th342nd283rd12th342nd104th255th
2016-1797th81st--170th114th95th315th323rd121st70th62nd133rd189th181st93rd329th71st152nd
2015-1692nd219th--41st121st49th276th303rd75th23rd168th46th27th41st94th327th45th126th
2014-1541st224th--67th30th211th100th304th47th4th90th85th32nd55th263rd333rd8th25th