TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 UAB  23-12 (0.657)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.734 (97th)
Schedule Strength: 0.576 (93rd)
Record Quality: 0.251 (68th)
Avg. Season Rank: 139.28 (135th)
Pace: 68.39 (132nd)
Momentum: 6.23 (17th)
Off. Momentum: 4.73 (11th)
Def. Momentum: 1.49 (73rd)
Consistency: -9.72 (247th)
Res. Consistency: -11.69 (142nd)
Away From Home: 2.57 (10th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.70 (13th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 112.67 33.35 74.78 84.95 46.18 26.64 34.78 22.88 40.63 35.43 58.33 11.94 16.48 7.39 31.36 26.93 41.71 1.90
RANK: 63rd 7th 75th 209th 82nd 323rd 162nd 173rd 114th 37th 152nd 146th 49th 24th 320th 165th 33rd 22nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.05 24.72 -- 86.72 43.91 31.57 34.63 23.18 37.98 31.97 57.38 12.02 13.42 5.01 36.40 26.73 36.87 2.00
RANK: 164th 114th -- 247th 158th 189th 190th 201st 136th 238th 159th 225th 186th 112th 154th 186th 206th 214th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but UAB, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They have a record of 23-12 and are ranked 97th overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 14) in the AAC (average ranking 134.8).

UAB succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 63rd in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 112 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UAB does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 33.35 vs. AO, they are ranked seventh in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. In addition, the team is in the top-75 in free throw shooting, converting a solid 74.8% of their attempts. UAB also does an outstanding job finishing any scoring chances they obtain from offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 7.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 24th nationally), and with a rating of 16.48, they're 49th in potential points scored off of the offensive glass as well.

Though they're not quite as efficient defensively as they are offensively, UAB still does OK when the opposition has possession of the ball. The team ranks 164th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Although they have a capable defense, UAB doesn't stand out in any one particular area on that end of the court, and they fall outside the top-100 in every one of the defensive categories we take into consideration for this analysis.

UAB has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked 17th in positive momentum. When playing on the road, UAB has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked tenth in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UAB performs worse against squads that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.87%, UAB is more efficient than normal 10% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 79% of the time.
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, UAB usually performs worse than average. UAB is more efficient than normal 38% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 101.30. In all other contests, UAB performs better than average 92% of the time.
UAB is typically worse vs. teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. Against foes that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.33%, UAB performs above their norm 41% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 92% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2597th97th80th83rdAAC63rd174th144th154th208th104th
2023-2497th97th72nd68thAAC132nd247th93rd13th10th135th
2022-2348th47th36th40thConference USA30th12th113th265th215th63rd
2021-2259th59th21st52ndConference USA92nd68th151st210th354th42nd
2020-21100th100th22nd72ndConference USA250th201st223rd261st233rd86th
2019-20190th190th122nd165thConference USA273rd252nd219th96th42nd208th
2018-19137th136th129th165thConference USA301st104th207th35th154th168th
2017-18119th119th109th120thConference USA181st306th149th256th225th130th
2016-17186th186th168th187thConference USA280th333rd180th161st341st158th
2015-16116th116th15th64thConference USA153rd192nd232nd111th185th114th
2014-15122nd122nd145th135thConference USA185th173rd133rd26th170th157th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2553rd89th55th8th113th327th153rd30th296th24th76th41st8th10th350th53rd85th18th
2023-2463rd7th75th209th82nd323rd162nd173rd114th37th152nd146th49th24th320th165th33rd22nd
2022-2357th28th123rd36th139th289th163rd112th339th34th101st14th17th10th312th140th58th33rd
2021-2239th222nd88th25th46th254th23rd38th166th132nd48th8th82nd68th290th57th184th101st
2020-21139th163rd231st11th188th341st307th1st192nd156th102nd40th90th169th352nd5th230th45th
2019-20217th168th162nd276th103rd331st266th34th94th264th57th236th158th210th326th25th240th88th
2018-19121st194th226th54th120th277th214th69th17th75th204th167th164th33rd311th84th117th64th
2017-18101st295th168th134th31st268th201st212th44th33rd46th205th167th40th276th224th35th46th
2016-17181st114th75th278th161st263rd253rd214th179th74th182nd318th144th58th247th198th51st55th
2015-16103rd248th135th97th77th162nd123rd244th93rd46th129th148th91st41st174th260th57th108th
2014-15118th189th39th89th155th247th126th160th170th32nd241st167th27th20th266th189th57th54th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25195th43rd--340th184th136th202nd321st30th259th310th57th265th220th75th285th195th258th
2023-24164th114th--247th158th189th190th201st136th238th159th225th186th112th154th186th206th214th
2022-2348th74th--190th46th225th27th285th60th65th156th220th56th10th212th289th53rd90th
2021-22102nd180th--53rd168th135th174th206th73rd84th274th28th104th111th184th259th112th142nd
2020-2161st100th--42nd143rd95th243rd303rd205th24th139th3rd33rd91st139th327th38th102nd
2019-20169th143rd--147th164th262nd254th329th284th6th243rd258th45th65th270th332nd7th15th
2018-19152nd197th--160th109th333rd172nd219th236th24th155th42nd87th51st334th228th23rd10th
2017-18149th39th--220th135th339th221st64th205th103rd104th303rd155th83rd338th45th96th26th
2016-17186th48th--312th142nd312th164th105th218th266th94th289th283rd257th269th64th211th149th
2015-16141st63rd--288th136th249th133rd119th147th279th104th306th281st266th206th88th250th211th
2014-15124th129th--268th124th135th50th121st96th321st122nd261st279th220th101st95th307th293rd