Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 UAB22-7 (0.759) | Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.722 (100th)
Schedule Strength: 0.424 (223rd)
Record Quality: 0.224 (72nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 89.10 (86th)
Pace: 68.39 (250th)
Momentum: 0.52 (150th)
Off. Momentum: 2.04 (72nd)
Def. Momentum: -1.51 (240th)
Consistency: -9.52 (201st)
Res. Consistency: -13.36 (235th)
Away From Home: -0.56 (233rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.19 (261st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
101.28
68.52
24.93
69.50
88.15
38.23
43.38
24.35
7.48
30.73
35.23
13.22
37.52
28.57
17.53
61.37
14.17
14.38
4.86
27.62
39.97
32.41
1.95
RANK:
139th
246th
163rd
231st
11th
70th
188th
341st
344th
307th
1st
6th
192nd
156th
108th
102nd
40th
90th
169th
352nd
5th
230th
45th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
94.00
68.26
22.60
--
78.29
33.94
43.35
28.59
10.11
35.37
26.16
10.18
38.91
23.53
13.65
57.98
6.88
10.41
4.22
36.52
33.42
30.06
2.06
RANK:
61st
103rd
100th
--
42nd
82nd
143rd
95th
146th
243rd
303rd
299th
205th
24th
27th
139th
3rd
33rd
91st
139th
327th
38th
102nd
ANALYSIS: They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but UAB, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They have a record of 22-7 and are ranked 100th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 14) in Conference USA (average ranking 168.9).
UAB will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 61st in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 94 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UAB is a solid rebounding team that will deny the opposition chances to score off of offensive rebounds. They have a rating of 10.41 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 33rd in the country). UAB also does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 40th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 14.17.
UAB is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 139th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UAB allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 6.88, which ranks #3 in the country. UAB also loves taking the mid-range two, far more so than most other teams. The club is ranked fifth in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those mid-range shots goes, the team shoots a mediocre 37.5% vs. AO. UAB is lastly one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 11th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.15 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 43.4% of them vs. AO.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UAB performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.03, UAB is more efficient than normal 89% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 28% of the time.
When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, UAB usually performs better than average. UAB is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.10. In all other contests, UAB performs better than average 11% of the time.
UAB is typically better vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.38%, UAB performs above their norm 77% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 21% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Bassey's 22 lifts Western Kentucky past UAB 64-60 in CUSA (3/12/2021 4:13:42 PM) FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Charles Bassey had 22 points as Western Kentucky narrowly defeated UAB 64-60 in the semifinals of the Conference USA Conference Tournament on Friday.
Ertel scores 22 to lead UAB over Rice 73-60 in CUSA tourney (3/11/2021 9:26:36 PM) FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Michael Ertel had a season-high 22 points as UAB defeated Rice 73-60 in the Conference USA Tournament quarterfinals on Thursday night.
Toney lifts UAB past Rust College 117-45 (2/22/2021 9:46:01 PM) BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Tony Toney scored 23 points as UAB rolled past NAIA member Rust College 117-45 on Monday night.
Blazers cool of ODU in Birmingham (2/20/2021 4:18:12 AM) UAB beat the Monarchs 76-69 in a showdown of second place teams in their division.
Lofton, Jr., Williams Lift LA Tech over UAB - Southernminn.com (2/12/2021 11:33:00 PM) Kenneth Lofton, Jr. and Cobe Williams combined for 36 points in helping Louisiana Tech defeat UAB, 70-58, on Friday night inside the Thomas Assembly Center on Karl Malone Court.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.