TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UAB  24-13 (0.649)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.736 (97th)
Schedule Strength: 0.485 (144th)
Record Quality: 0.184 (83rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 109.96 (104th)
Pace: 68.50 (62nd)
Momentum: 2.05 (90th)
Off. Momentum: -1.80 (298th)
Def. Momentum: 3.85 (14th)
Consistency: -9.36 (173rd)
Res. Consistency: -9.95 (38th)
Away From Home: -0.51 (206th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.72 (155th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 117.24 29.56 76.35 93.74 45.30 28.32 34.46 28.21 34.18 37.21 61.97 15.16 20.45 8.57 30.21 30.09 39.70 1.91
RANK: 53rd 89th 55th 8th 112th 327th 152nd 30th 296th 24th 77th 41st 8th 11th 350th 53rd 84th 18th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.11 23.18 -- 91.42 44.34 32.65 34.51 25.04 32.61 33.73 62.58 10.45 15.76 6.30 35.71 27.39 36.90 1.99
RANK: 195th 42nd -- 339th 185th 137th 202nd 322nd 34th 258th 310th 55th 267th 220th 75th 285th 193rd 259th

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, UAB is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Haslametrics has them ranked 97th overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 24-13. Of the 13 schools in the AAC (average ranking 159.4), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

UAB succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 53rd in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 117 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UAB is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked eighth in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 93.74 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 45.3% of them vs. AO. UAB also appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 20.45 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked eighth in the NCAA), and they convert 8.6% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 11th) as well.

The defense for UAB, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 195th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UAB struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 339th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 91.42 vs. AO. If UAB does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to prevent opponents from draining shot attempts in between the three-point line and the low post. AO will convert just 32.6% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the team is nationally ranked 34th-best in that category as a result.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, UAB often performs worse than normal. UAB is more efficient than usual 25% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 13.19. In their other contests, UAB performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
UAB does worse vs. clubs that favor a faster tempo. When playing squads that have a pace vs. AO greater than 68.04, UAB performs above average 27% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 72% of the time.
UAB performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.41%, UAB is more efficient than normal 71% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2597th97th80th83rdAAC62nd173rd144th155th206th104th
2023-2497th97th72nd68thAAC132nd247th93rd13th10th135th
2022-2348th47th36th40thConference USA30th12th113th265th215th63rd
2021-2259th59th21st52ndConference USA92nd68th151st210th354th42nd
2020-21100th100th22nd72ndConference USA250th201st223rd261st233rd86th
2019-20190th190th122nd165thConference USA273rd252nd219th96th42nd208th
2018-19137th136th129th165thConference USA301st104th207th35th154th168th
2017-18119th119th109th120thConference USA181st306th149th256th225th130th
2016-17186th186th168th187thConference USA280th333rd180th161st341st158th
2015-16116th116th15th64thConference USA153rd192nd232nd111th185th114th
2014-15122nd122nd145th135thConference USA185th173rd133rd26th170th157th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2553rd89th55th8th112th327th152nd30th296th24th77th41st8th11th350th53rd84th18th
2023-2463rd7th75th209th82nd323rd162nd173rd114th37th152nd146th49th24th320th165th33rd22nd
2022-2357th28th123rd36th139th289th163rd112th339th34th101st14th17th10th312th140th58th33rd
2021-2239th222nd88th25th46th254th23rd38th166th132nd48th8th82nd68th290th57th184th101st
2020-21139th163rd231st11th188th341st307th1st192nd156th102nd40th90th169th352nd5th230th45th
2019-20217th168th162nd276th103rd331st266th34th94th264th57th236th158th210th326th25th240th88th
2018-19121st194th226th54th120th277th214th69th17th75th204th167th164th33rd311th84th117th64th
2017-18101st295th168th134th31st268th201st212th44th33rd46th205th167th40th276th224th35th46th
2016-17181st114th75th278th161st263rd253rd214th179th74th182nd318th144th58th247th198th51st55th
2015-16103rd248th135th97th77th162nd123rd244th93rd46th129th148th91st41st174th260th57th108th
2014-15118th189th39th89th155th247th126th160th170th32nd241st167th27th20th266th189th57th54th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25195th42nd--339th185th137th202nd322nd34th258th310th55th267th220th75th285th193rd259th
2023-24164th114th--247th158th189th190th201st136th238th159th225th186th112th154th186th206th214th
2022-2348th74th--190th46th225th27th285th60th65th156th220th56th10th212th289th53rd90th
2021-22102nd180th--53rd168th135th174th206th73rd84th274th28th104th111th184th259th112th142nd
2020-2161st100th--42nd143rd95th243rd303rd205th24th139th3rd33rd91st139th327th38th102nd
2019-20169th143rd--147th164th262nd254th329th284th6th243rd258th45th65th270th332nd7th15th
2018-19152nd197th--160th109th333rd172nd219th236th24th155th42nd87th51st334th228th23rd10th
2017-18149th39th--220th135th339th221st64th205th103rd104th303rd155th83rd338th45th96th26th
2016-17186th48th--312th142nd312th164th105th218th266th94th289th283rd257th269th64th211th149th
2015-16141st63rd--288th136th249th133rd119th147th279th104th306th281st266th206th88th250th211th
2014-15124th129th--268th124th135th50th121st96th321st122nd261st279th220th101st95th307th293rd