TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 NC State  15-17 (0.469)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.714 (101st)
Schedule Strength: 0.684 (58th)
Record Quality: 0.087 (119th)
Avg. Season Rank: 95.90 (93rd)
Pace: 72.22 (68th)
Momentum: -0.96 (215th)
Off. Momentum: -0.87 (253rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.09 (141st)
Consistency: -9.19 (204th)
Res. Consistency: -12.54 (256th)
Away From Home: -2.47 (336th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.88 (335th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.05 29.52 69.71 81.42 47.91 27.80 37.65 24.41 38.58 29.21 65.47 10.89 16.85 9.53 34.15 29.98 35.88 1.98
RANK: 55th 85th 195th 195th 35th 233rd 55th 144th 77th 132nd 44th 159th 51st 12th 233rd 143rd 133rd 120th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.44 24.41 -- 85.90 43.85 31.46 36.82 23.42 36.56 31.02 56.48 11.25 14.60 6.75 36.63 27.27 36.11 2.01
RANK: 214th 61st -- 324th 149th 266th 247th 159th 153rd 275th 80th 212th 184th 168th 194th 106th 224th 202nd

ANALYSIS:
NC State is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Their record this season is 15-17, and the club is ranked 101st overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #14 team (out of 15) in the ACC (average ranking 47.2).

The primary strength for NC State this year is offense. The team is ranked 55th in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. NC State does an outstanding job finishing any scoring chances they obtain from offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 9.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 12th nationally). NC State also boasts one of the better offensive field goal percentages in the college game. The squad is ranked 35th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 47.9% of their attempts vs. AO.

Unfortunately, NC State is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 214th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. NC State struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 324th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.90 vs. AO.

On the road, NC State performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 336th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
NC State does better vs. clubs that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When playing squads that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 100.78, NC State performs above average 73% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 29% of the time.
NC State performs better against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 82.17, NC State is more efficient than normal 73% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 29% of the time.
When playing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, NC State usually performs better than average. NC State is more efficient than normal 61% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 41.76%. In all other contests, NC State performs better than average 21% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25113th112th287th185thACC287th113th83rd271st344th88th
2023-2433rd33rd90th44thACC187th127th26th63rd106th64th
2022-2343rd43rd58th38thACC117th54th72nd198th158th44th
2021-22121st120th290th194thACC181st222nd64th56th33rd107th
2020-2166th66th137th84thACC217th307th79th335th18th50th
2019-2052nd52nd91st52ndACC89th39th62nd43rd240th47th
2018-1949th49th64th50thACC52nd126th79th324th135th30th
2017-1845th45th84th53rdACC53rd82nd69th21st341st56th
2016-17101st101st207th119thACC68th204th58th335th336th93rd
2015-1673rd73rd198th116thACC185th173rd32nd136th6th75th
2014-1524th23rd104th39thACC227th310th11th205th266th34th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25148th108th166th53rd221st207th186th94th293rd163rd182nd111th247th214th238th110th199th156th
2023-2444th56th129th73rd63rd288th56th61st139th141st83rd39th114th75th305th68th179th89th
2022-2329th221st157th3rd71st157th74th33rd63rd167th88th5th117th117th253rd67th267th188th
2021-2269th78th167th12th218th122nd84th258th333rd10th285th56th68th121st195th296th43rd85th
2020-2156th55th144th237th20th337th35th157th158th40th39th9th244th49th330th144th27th16th
2019-2043rd151st176th38th36th205th234th130th31st52nd47th33rd290th191st252nd169th94th85th
2018-1937th152nd215th10th93rd203rd159th111th49th29th162nd29th12th25th271st163rd80th67th
2017-1816th35th267th69th15th254th13th193rd42nd25th86th18th71st17th279th220th36th47th
2016-1755th85th195th195th35th233rd55th144th77th132nd44th159th51st12th233rd143rd133rd120th
2015-1645th24th175th48th84th263rd75th36th160th157th62nd213th6th27th289th50th220th110th
2014-1521st69th199th14th63rd158th42nd51st59th182nd77th339th34th99th222nd80th261st190th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25126th137th--157th146th20th223rd140th13th350th111th105th89th110th19th145th354th359th
2023-2425th64th--132nd38th186th23rd241st111th100th56th3rd47th32nd195th252nd112th132nd
2022-2375th208th--87th110th40th15th171st174th276th113th25th136th159th66th197th316th325th
2021-22236th134th--180th248th144th257th51st80th327th219th51st85th131st140th43rd335th301st
2020-2191st84th--135th150th55th134th230th130th240th150th49th121st18th58th244th257th297th
2019-2078th232nd--105th101st38th67th196th120th269th79th218th70th94th55th217th293rd312th
2018-1967th228th--44th129th25th42nd71st34th294th137th79th250th272nd50th104th332nd331st
2017-18110th167th--106th203rd34th10th44th56th339th240th65th270th303rd45th40th344th335th
2016-17214th61st--324th149th266th247th159th153rd275th80th212th184th168th194th106th224th202nd
2015-16135th31st--325th92nd288th239th287th59th125th117th291st98th92nd238th255th69th77th
2014-1559th131st--317th21st177th67th302nd49th190th7th53rd178th83rd128th261st134th181st