TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Montana  20-13 (0.606)  |  Big Sky
All-Play Percentage: 0.569 (151st)
Schedule Strength: 0.444 (228th)
Record Quality: 0.032 (156th)
Avg. Season Rank: 156.18 (150th)
Pace: 63.15 (308th)
Momentum: 0.06 (160th)
Off. Momentum: 0.62 (173rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.56 (159th)
Consistency: -9.72 (234th)
Res. Consistency: -11.31 (163rd)
Away From Home: -0.16 (183rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.77 (245th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.74 26.20 72.79 81.40 44.21 32.25 36.27 24.86 37.54 24.28 61.58 9.90 11.39 5.30 39.62 30.54 29.83 2.10
RANK: 119th 278th 65th 191st 114th 45th 94th 192nd 77th 320th 85th 266th 331st 300th 39th 192nd 320th 329th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.75 32.01 -- 79.07 44.28 28.77 33.63 25.40 38.02 24.90 62.97 12.78 13.62 5.78 36.39 32.13 31.49 2.05
RANK: 203rd 269th -- 68th 208th 214th 110th 172nd 267th 45th 294th 286th 60th 76th 265th 218th 74th 66th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Montana should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Carrying a record of 20-13, they are currently rated #151 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of 12) in the Big Sky (average ranking 242.4).

Montana will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 119th in offensive efficiency and scores more than 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Montana will make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 39th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to shoot from long, they have the ability to punish you for it, too. Ranked in the top-100 in three-point shooting percentage, they make approximately 36.3% of their three-point attempts vs. AO. Montana also converts a fair amount of its free throws. Making 72.8% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 65th nationally in free throw percentage. Unfortunately, with a free throw attempt rate of just 26.20 vs. AO, they don't provide themselves a whole lot of opportunities at the foul line. If Montana does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad only has a rating of 11.39 vs. AO in potential points off of second chances, which ranks 21st-worst in college hoops.

Montana doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 203rd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Montana does not stand out in a positive manner when they're asked to defend in the paint. The team is ranked 294th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 63.0% of their attempts from close-up.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Montana is typically worse vs. teams that favor a faster tempo. Against foes that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.06, Montana performs above their norm 20% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Montana often performs worse than normal. Montana is more efficient than usual 38% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.02%. In their other contests, Montana performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
Montana does better vs. clubs that convert well from outside the arc. When playing squads that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.49%, Montana performs above average 65% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25141st141st43rd92ndBig Sky206th287th193rd210th133rd165th
2023-24156th156th65th142ndBig Sky282nd270th272nd292nd307th146th
2022-23159th159th153rd164thBig Sky341st165th185th192nd135th162nd
2021-22253rd252nd148th238thBig Sky280th205th336th296th352nd244th
2020-21231st231st159th208thBig Sky286th251st144th58th82nd181st
2019-20131st131st131st137thBig Sky166th122nd161st162nd245th144th
2018-19143rd143rd33rd112thBig Sky166th233rd286th242nd73rd130th
2017-1875th75th24th70thBig Sky200th79th206th243rd311th91st
2016-17174th174th179th209thBig Sky232nd262nd264th125th93rd169th
2015-16145th145th90th167thBig Sky294th299th278th306th296th175th
2014-15151st151st107th156thBig Sky308th234th228th245th183rd150th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2594th191st67th314th31st269th105th245th87th103rd35th257th314th249th236th228th67th76th
2023-2498th303rd6th203rd69th94th134th129th18th329th55th349th315th288th85th133rd326th319th
2022-23101st290th4th176th116th63rd50th129th23rd349th151st350th348th358th63rd129th349th342nd
2021-22235th17th9th356th263rd230th236th185th306th323rd145th341st352nd356th160th117th279th248th
2020-21252nd98th6th347th229th331st167th49th227th333rd190th356th268th291st300th14th303rd161st
2019-20174th297th141st269th34th322nd29th25th87th301st24th163rd353rd351st317th21st280th118th
2018-19141st249th216th284th48th169th63rd249th64th175th88th125th292nd278th140th238th142nd186th
2017-18104th72nd161st118th112th310th147th166th180th13th210th12th106th64th323rd184th17th13th
2016-17125th176th39th95th171st201st207th148th139th93rd196th240th260th281st214th162nd122nd128th
2015-16134th226th213th277th67th168th28th196th56th245th139th332nd337th338th141st186th213th218th
2014-15119th278th65th191st114th45th94th192nd77th320th85th266th331st300th39th192nd320th329th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25235th184th--206th266th36th212th339th309th168th233rd101st64th172nd25th343rd157th278th
2023-24258th272nd--329th197th33rd148th312th160th330th160th273rd208th105th15th295th292nd337th
2022-23280th319th--161st240th35th161st328th229th159th277th195th211th180th41st336th154th264th
2021-22277th351st--54th303rd1st302nd234th270th344th138th92nd202nd234th2nd283rd355th358th
2020-21178th319th--147th194th28th185th314th200th188th169th258th198th109th28th320th207th296th
2019-20101st328th--13th170th7th149th219th121st143rd174th89th37th72nd21st299th250th319th
2018-19150th227th--70th210th33rd183rd215th170th195th209th106th93rd95th49th253rd248th284th
2017-1844th255th--24th113th7th101st276th211th135th50th18th143rd151st17th314th196th305th
2016-17220th317th--106th251st28th90th229th290th214th243rd84th106th203rd41st257th243rd293rd
2015-16200th295th--52nd200th203rd143rd107th273rd104th221st187th28th118th255th143rd149th120th
2014-15203rd269th--68th208th214th110th172nd267th45th294th286th60th76th265th218th74th66th