TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Ole Miss  24-12 (0.667)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.931 (26th)
Schedule Strength: 0.745 (23rd)
Record Quality: 0.371 (29th)
Avg. Season Rank: 33.24 (32nd)
Pace: 67.07 (151st)
Momentum: 4.22 (27th)
Off. Momentum: 1.84 (87th)
Def. Momentum: 2.38 (43rd)
Consistency: -9.60 (199th)
Res. Consistency: -10.88 (69th)
Away From Home: 1.37 (24th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 2.75 (5th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 121.57 30.90 73.78 89.61 47.73 34.83 37.96 23.45 38.99 31.34 65.14 17.09 14.14 6.20 38.86 26.17 34.97 2.04
RANK: 20th 56th 120th 75th 36th 143rd 24th 131st 116th 206th 25th 12th 203rd 151st 176th 145th 241st 221st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.51 27.28 -- 82.43 40.24 33.94 31.79 21.87 33.96 26.63 56.18 8.11 14.77 5.65 41.17 26.53 32.30 2.09
RANK: 27th 183rd -- 17th 38th 198th 57th 206th 54th 21st 86th 4th 196th 132nd 283rd 261st 40th 55th

ANALYSIS:
A borderline top-25 caliber team, Ole Miss will almost certainly present a challenging task for any Division I opponent. They are ranked #26 (out of 364) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 24-12. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 16) in the SEC (average ranking 32.0). Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.745 (the 23rd-highest in the country), Ole Miss has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.

Ole Miss is undoubtedly one of the best in the business on offense. The team is rated 20th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 121 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Ole Miss allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.11, which ranks #4 in the country. Ole Miss is also an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They convert 38.0% of their three-pointers (24th in the nation), 65.1% of their near-proximity attempts (25th), and 47.7% of their total shots from the field (36th) vs. AO.

Ole Miss plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 27th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 97 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Ole Miss thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked 12th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 17.09. Ole Miss also has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 17th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 82.43 vs. AO.

Ole Miss has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #27 ranking in positive momentum. When playing on the road, Ole Miss has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 24th in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, Ole Miss often performs worse than normal. Ole Miss is more efficient than usual 30% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 13.30. In their other contests, Ole Miss performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Ole Miss does worse vs. clubs that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When playing squads that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 99.78, Ole Miss performs above average 28% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 72% of the time.
Ole Miss performs worse against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.03, Ole Miss is more efficient than normal 27% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2526th26th65th29thSEC151st199th23rd5th24th32nd
2023-2496th96th94th59thSEC190th214th63rd68th155th85th
2022-23104th103rd288th205thSEC230th6th65th177th66th86th
2021-22105th105th256th156thSEC244th250th53rd82nd238th102nd
2020-2151st51st130th68thSEC315th291st78th328th305th45th
2019-2089th89th224th134thSEC104th190th70th262nd352nd82nd
2018-1947th47th101st51stSEC117th133rd46th309th272nd39th
2017-1896th96th274th156thSEC39th18th23rd175th276th85th
2016-1769th69th101st52ndSEC26th80th47th91st43rd78th
2015-1684th84th98th74thSEC126th19th87th77th210th99th
2014-1545th45th99th46thSEC64th112th35th89th1st50th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2520th56th120th75th36th143rd24th131st116th206th25th12th203rd151st176th145th241st221st
2023-2460th89th146th126th62nd237th48th62nd125th263rd56th40th164th206th253rd62nd272nd192nd
2022-23126th177th236th26th163rd219th226th207th341st18th127th28th58th171st265th251st40th58th
2021-22117th206th187th86th99th212th189th80th299th197th16th75th226th265th229th94th224th171st
2020-21101st63rd203rd83rd90th343rd243rd18th92nd126th114th44th42nd38th346th17th161st32nd
2019-20158th118th99th261st90th303rd218th48th97th278th39th39th254th160th289th34th262nd134th
2018-1936th222nd5th171st22nd131st37th96th48th309th11th42nd186th64th129th94th302nd277th
2017-1874th96th94th26th141st143rd267th80th153rd179th47th58th20th29th180th101st239th194th
2016-1762nd32nd40th164th123rd165th137th231st230th83rd140th27th33rd33rd168th247th91st145th
2015-1663rd40th155th81st157th63rd105th257th99th109th227th74th26th85th83rd281st138th229th
2014-1528th90th5th15th117th170th164th57th37th160th153rd105th68th116th227th85th249th171st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2527th183rd--17th38th198th57th206th54th21st86th4th196th132nd283rd261st40th55th
2023-24150th178th--231st145th147th189th130th55th312th123rd61st303rd326th110th118th301st290th
2022-23109th121st--134th133rd111th124th68th269th327th37th90th142nd161st108th63rd336th309th
2021-22103rd47th--48th220th160th166th155th175th103rd322nd80th5th75th202nd188th136th143rd
2020-2117th142nd--19th63rd119th179th206th95th29th52nd46th9th3rd207th275th76th98th
2019-2063rd268th--28th86th65th40th302nd132nd20th233rd105th113th120th111th335th44th119th
2018-1961st173rd--63rd124th21st235th342nd43rd36th255th111th235th256th30th348th43rd184th
2017-18123rd204th--153rd97th234th223rd274th16th52nd202nd42nd193rd177th243rd278th51st75th
2016-1775th108th--121st59th319th153rd26th10th152nd71st111th64th55th328th28th161st64th
2015-16100th193rd--70th114th262nd229th51st48th159th106th238th122nd157th296th55th186th110th
2014-1589th209th--124th35th334th228th77th4th44th54th10th52nd11th341st90th52nd17th