TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Ole Miss  15-17 (0.469)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.750 (89th)
Schedule Strength: 0.663 (70th)
Record Quality: 0.088 (134th)
Avg. Season Rank: 81.77 (82nd)
Pace: 70.71 (104th)
Momentum: -2.29 (287th)
Off. Momentum: -0.34 (243rd)
Def. Momentum: -1.96 (265th)
Consistency: -9.19 (190th)
Res. Consistency: -13.05 (263rd)
Away From Home: -4.24 (352nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.86 (262nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.87 26.76 73.58 79.81 44.82 26.38 32.77 27.78 38.86 25.65 63.68 13.84 11.32 5.10 33.06 34.81 32.13 2.01
RANK: 158th 118th 99th 261st 90th 303rd 218th 48th 97th 278th 39th 39th 254th 160th 289th 34th 262nd 134th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.57 27.74 -- 77.26 41.63 27.76 30.58 26.09 36.08 23.42 60.91 10.23 12.11 4.57 35.92 33.77 30.31 2.06
RANK: 63rd 268th -- 28th 86th 65th 40th 302nd 132nd 20th 233rd 105th 113th 120th 111th 335th 44th 119th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Ole Miss, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Haslametrics has them ranked 89th overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 15-17. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 66.1).

The primary strength for Ole Miss is defense. The team is ranked 63rd in efficiency, allowing fewer than 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Ole Miss does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 28th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 77.26 vs. AO. Ole Miss also does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 39th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 13.84.

Ole Miss is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 158th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Ole Miss favors the mid-range jumper over any of the others. The club is ranked 34th in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to take that in-between shot, they can certainly make it, too. Currently rated in the top-100 in mid-range shooting percentage, they make roughly 38.9% of their attempts from that distance vs. AO. Ole Miss also has the potential to make you pay if you let them get close to the rim. The team is ranked 39th in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 63.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

On the road, Ole Miss performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked second from the bottom in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Ole Miss usually performs worse than average. Ole Miss is more efficient than normal 23% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.72. In all other contests, Ole Miss performs better than average 63% of the time.
Ole Miss is typically worse vs. teams that prefer the outside shot. Against foes that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.05, Ole Miss performs above their norm 20% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 59% of the time.
When facing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, Ole Miss often performs better than normal. Ole Miss is more efficient than usual 70% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.18%. In their other contests, Ole Miss performs better than the norm 36% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Georgia tops Mississippi 81-63 in SEC Tournament opener
(3/12/2020 12:46:00 AM) Rayshaun Hammonds had 22 points and 11 rebounds, and Georgia shot 55% to beat Mississippi 81-63 in the opener of the Southeastern Conference Tournament
Next up for Florida
(3/11/2020 9:31:00 PM) Georgia forward Rayshaun Hammonds (20) celebrates after a score against Mississippi in the second half of an NCAA college basketball game in the Southeastern Conference Tournament Wednesday, March 11, 2020, in Nashville, Tenn. Georgia won 81-63. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey) The Gators (19-12) take on Georgia (16-16) in the second round of the SEC ...
Tokyo organizers, IOC going ahead as planned with Olympics
(2/25/2020 11:53:00 PM) AUBURN, Ala. (AP) — Austin Wiley had 15 points and 11 rebounds and No. 15 Auburn withstood Mississippi's rally attempts for a 67-58 win Tuesday night. The Tigers (24-4, 11-4 Southeastern Conference) benefited from the return of Isaac Okoro, who missed ...
No. 12 Kentucky edges Mississippi 67-62 for 4th straight win
(2/15/2020 7:48:00 PM) Nick Richards had 16 points, including two go-ahead free throws with 1:11 remaining, and Immanuel Quickley and Keion Brooks each made two more in the closing seconds to help No. 12 Kentucky escape Mis
Calipari sees beauty in Maxey’s bricked three near end of UK’s win against Ole Miss
(2/15/2020 7:13:00 PM) Kentucky Coach John Calipari saw significance in the three-point brick Tyrese Maxey shot inside the final two minutes of his team’s 67-62 win against Mississippi on Saturday night. Maxey shot from the right wing. The ball banked off the glass to the left of the basket. It was the freshman’s reaction to such a miss that caught Calipari’s eye.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2526th26th65th29thSEC151st199th23rd5th24th32nd
2023-2496th96th94th59thSEC190th214th63rd68th155th85th
2022-23104th103rd288th205thSEC230th6th65th177th66th86th
2021-22105th105th256th156thSEC244th250th53rd82nd238th102nd
2020-2151st51st130th68thSEC315th291st78th328th305th45th
2019-2089th89th224th134thSEC104th190th70th262nd352nd82nd
2018-1947th47th101st51stSEC117th133rd46th309th272nd39th
2017-1896th96th274th156thSEC39th18th23rd175th276th85th
2016-1769th69th101st52ndSEC26th80th47th91st43rd78th
2015-1684th84th98th74thSEC126th19th87th77th210th99th
2014-1545th45th99th46thSEC64th112th35th89th1st50th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2520th57th120th75th36th141st24th131st116th206th25th12th203rd151st175th144th244th222nd
2023-2460th89th146th126th62nd237th48th62nd125th263rd56th40th164th206th253rd62nd272nd192nd
2022-23126th177th236th26th163rd219th226th207th341st18th127th28th58th171st265th251st40th58th
2021-22117th206th187th86th99th212th189th80th299th197th16th75th226th265th229th94th224th171st
2020-21101st63rd203rd83rd90th343rd243rd18th92nd126th114th44th42nd38th346th17th161st32nd
2019-20158th118th99th261st90th303rd218th48th97th278th39th39th254th160th289th34th262nd134th
2018-1936th222nd5th171st22nd131st37th96th48th309th11th42nd186th64th129th94th302nd277th
2017-1874th96th94th26th141st143rd267th80th153rd179th47th58th20th29th180th101st239th194th
2016-1762nd32nd40th164th123rd165th137th231st230th83rd140th27th33rd33rd168th247th91st145th
2015-1663rd40th155th81st157th63rd105th257th99th109th227th74th26th85th83rd281st138th229th
2014-1528th90th5th15th117th170th164th57th37th160th153rd105th68th116th227th85th249th171st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2526th185th--17th38th194th57th205th55th21st85th4th196th134th283rd261st43rd57th
2023-24150th178th--231st145th147th189th130th55th312th123rd61st303rd326th110th118th301st290th
2022-23109th121st--134th133rd111th124th68th269th327th37th90th142nd161st108th63rd336th309th
2021-22103rd47th--48th220th160th166th155th175th103rd322nd80th5th75th202nd188th136th143rd
2020-2117th142nd--19th63rd119th179th206th95th29th52nd46th9th3rd207th275th76th98th
2019-2063rd268th--28th86th65th40th302nd132nd20th233rd105th113th120th111th335th44th119th
2018-1961st173rd--63rd124th21st235th342nd43rd36th255th111th235th256th30th348th43rd184th
2017-18123rd204th--153rd97th234th223rd274th16th52nd202nd42nd193rd177th243rd278th51st75th
2016-1775th108th--121st59th319th153rd26th10th152nd71st111th64th55th328th28th161st64th
2015-16100th193rd--70th114th262nd229th51st48th159th106th238th122nd157th296th55th186th110th
2014-1589th209th--124th35th334th228th77th4th44th54th10th52nd11th341st90th52nd17th