TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Ole Miss  20-12 (0.625)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.763 (84th)
Schedule Strength: 0.617 (87th)
Record Quality: 0.226 (74th)
Avg. Season Rank: 101.57 (99th)
Pace: 70.48 (126th)
Momentum: 1.81 (83rd)
Off. Momentum: 2.72 (53rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.91 (206th)
Consistency: -7.40 (19th)
Res. Consistency: -9.72 (55th)
Away From Home: -0.33 (210th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.43 (77th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.36 32.44 70.32 84.18 43.86 32.42 36.11 21.51 37.07 30.25 57.00 12.55 18.68 7.66 38.51 25.55 35.94 2.03
RANK: 63rd 40th 155th 81st 157th 63rd 105th 257th 99th 109th 227th 74th 26th 85th 83rd 281st 138th 229th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.66 29.45 -- 79.48 42.64 30.81 35.93 20.50 32.69 28.17 57.23 11.61 14.14 6.69 38.76 25.80 35.44 2.03
RANK: 100th 193rd -- 70th 114th 262nd 229th 51st 48th 159th 106th 238th 122nd 157th 296th 55th 186th 110th

ANALYSIS:
This website places Ole Miss in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. Carrying a record of 20-12, they are currently rated #84 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 83.6).

Ole Miss succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 63rd in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 108 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Ole Miss has established itself as a team that cleans the offensive glass quite well. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 18.68 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 26th in the NCAA). Ole Miss also does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.44 vs. AO, they are ranked 40th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.3%.

Ole Miss plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 100th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 99 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Ole Miss has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 48th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 32.7% of their attempts from that distance. Ole Miss also has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 70th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 79.48 vs. AO.

Ole Miss is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 19th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Ole Miss does worse vs. clubs that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.04, Ole Miss performs above average 10% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 64% of the time.
Ole Miss performs better against squads that prefer the outside shot. When facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.00, Ole Miss is more efficient than normal 73% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2523rd23rd65th29thSEC150th200th22nd5th24th32nd
2023-2496th96th94th59thSEC190th214th63rd68th155th85th
2022-23104th103rd288th205thSEC230th6th65th177th66th86th
2021-22105th105th256th156thSEC244th250th53rd82nd238th102nd
2020-2151st51st130th68thSEC315th291st78th328th305th45th
2019-2089th89th224th134thSEC104th190th70th262nd352nd82nd
2018-1947th47th101st51stSEC117th133rd46th309th272nd39th
2017-1896th96th274th156thSEC39th18th23rd175th276th85th
2016-1769th69th101st52ndSEC26th80th47th91st43rd78th
2015-1684th84th98th74thSEC126th19th87th77th210th99th
2014-1545th45th99th46thSEC64th112th35th89th1st50th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2520th57th120th76th35th142nd23rd130th115th207th24th14th204th153rd176th143rd244th223rd
2023-2460th89th146th126th62nd237th48th62nd125th263rd56th40th164th206th253rd62nd272nd192nd
2022-23126th177th236th26th163rd219th226th207th341st18th127th28th58th171st265th251st40th58th
2021-22117th206th187th86th99th212th189th80th299th197th16th75th226th265th229th94th224th171st
2020-21101st63rd203rd83rd90th343rd243rd18th92nd126th114th44th42nd38th346th17th161st32nd
2019-20158th118th99th261st90th303rd218th48th97th278th39th39th254th160th289th34th262nd134th
2018-1936th222nd5th171st22nd131st37th96th48th309th11th42nd186th64th129th94th302nd277th
2017-1874th96th94th26th141st143rd267th80th153rd179th47th58th20th29th180th101st239th194th
2016-1762nd32nd40th164th123rd165th137th231st230th83rd140th27th33rd33rd168th247th91st145th
2015-1663rd40th155th81st157th63rd105th257th99th109th227th74th26th85th83rd281st138th229th
2014-1528th90th5th15th117th170th164th57th37th160th153rd105th68th116th227th85th249th171st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2526th185th--16th36th193rd52nd208th57th20th85th4th193rd133rd284th263rd41st55th
2023-24150th178th--231st145th147th189th130th55th312th123rd61st303rd326th110th118th301st290th
2022-23109th121st--134th133rd111th124th68th269th327th37th90th142nd161st108th63rd336th309th
2021-22103rd47th--48th220th160th166th155th175th103rd322nd80th5th75th202nd188th136th143rd
2020-2117th142nd--19th63rd119th179th206th95th29th52nd46th9th3rd207th275th76th98th
2019-2063rd268th--28th86th65th40th302nd132nd20th233rd105th113th120th111th335th44th119th
2018-1961st173rd--63rd124th21st235th342nd43rd36th255th111th235th256th30th348th43rd184th
2017-18123rd204th--153rd97th234th223rd274th16th52nd202nd42nd193rd177th243rd278th51st75th
2016-1775th108th--121st59th319th153rd26th10th152nd71st111th64th55th328th28th161st64th
2015-16100th193rd--70th114th262nd229th51st48th159th106th238th122nd157th296th55th186th110th
2014-1589th209th--124th35th334th228th77th4th44th54th10th52nd11th341st90th52nd17th