TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 UMKC  16-16 (0.500)  |  Summit League
All-Play Percentage: 0.474 (191st)
Schedule Strength: 0.356 (257th)
Record Quality: -0.139 (251st)
Avg. Season Rank: 236.29 (243rd)
Pace: 66.92 (247th)
Momentum: 6.33 (15th)
Off. Momentum: 0.13 (191st)
Def. Momentum: 6.20 (3rd)
Consistency: -8.83 (142nd)
Res. Consistency: -13.68 (276th)
Away From Home: -1.33 (295th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.91 (343rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.08 24.86 73.27 85.63 41.20 37.52 32.83 23.89 38.23 24.22 57.09 9.13 15.03 6.38 43.82 27.90 28.28 2.16
RANK: 248th 243rd 132nd 169th 300th 30th 256th 146th 214th 351st 202nd 305th 103rd 96th 29th 149th 351st 356th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.20 31.75 -- 80.61 44.49 29.09 31.80 25.40 43.00 26.11 60.07 11.38 13.49 5.47 36.09 31.51 32.39 2.04
RANK: 132nd 340th -- 20th 199th 75th 47th 275th 321st 21st 266th 176th 193rd 174th 138th 324th 55th 109th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, UMKC is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They have a record of 16-16 and are ranked 191st overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the nine schools in the Summit League (average ranking 231.6), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, UMKC will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #132 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UMKC has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 20th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 80.61 vs. AO. UMKC has also done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 47th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.8% of their attempts from afar. If UMKC does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's tendency to send opponents to the line too much by fouling. The squad has a rating of 31.75 in defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 23rd-worst in the country.

The offense for UMKC, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 248th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 101 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UMKC would not consider converting field goal attempts to be a strength. The team is rated #300 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 41.2% of their attempts vs. AO.

UMKC has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 15th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UMKC performs better against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.62, UMKC is more efficient than normal 80% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 7% of the time.
When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, UMKC usually performs better than average. UMKC is more efficient than normal 60% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.31. In all other contests, UMKC performs better than average 11% of the time.
UMKC is typically better vs. teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively. Against foes that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 107.13, UMKC performs above their norm 63% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 23% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25233rd233rd281st300thSummit League333rd124th208th281st315th246th
2023-24191st191st193rd251stSummit League247th142nd257th343rd295th243rd
2022-23318th318th295th304thSummit League335th268th266th24th154th250th
2021-22203rd203rd117th180thSummit League171st107th267th201st78th239th
2020-21197th197th209th221stSummit League346th278th137th107th169th225th
2019-20221st220th158th218thWAC325th48th228th155th54th212th
2018-19258th258th289th246thWAC245th129th134th250th300th265th
2017-18277th277th304th281stWAC90th276th148th232nd105th267th
2016-17226th226th175th199thWAC66th106th174th309th260th241st
2015-16235th235th254th261stWAC245th49th194th94th276th209th
2014-15289th289th237th282ndWAC200th81st292nd155th156th295th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25276th262nd56th115th346th76th255th22nd197th364th288th303rd110th141st83rd23rd364th361st
2023-24248th243rd132nd169th300th30th256th146th214th351st202nd305th103rd96th29th149th351st356th
2022-23339th60th185th113th363rd215th363rd45th362nd290th271st292nd29th205th240th49th306th231st
2021-22208th122nd293rd305th137th227th112th263rd146th139th209th126th328th281st201st242nd90th118th
2020-21256th213th276th321st132nd281st145th137th131st258th155th286th324th299th246th97th198th147th
2019-20258th307th236th232nd172nd236th226th203rd154th120th207th285th330th251st226th198th104th105th
2018-19244th229th182nd222nd246th128th200th286th333rd111th236th44th294th287th114th284th104th178th
2017-18283rd240th139th309th298th31st253rd270th166th336th260th218th347th343rd16th254th323rd343rd
2016-17212th185th174th293rd219th113th70th236th258th268th261st143rd259th183rd84th216th238th262nd
2015-16196th173rd255th220th204th227th62nd201st345th90th191st126th100th68th221st205th80th91st
2014-15280th126th143rd220th314th115th252nd291st178th119th346th115th175th269th103rd294th88th179th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25188th258th--150th208th118th54th313th350th70th235th354th274th281st128th328th82nd140th
2023-24132nd340th--20th199th75th47th275th321st21st266th176th193rd174th138th324th55th109th
2022-23284th352nd--138th156th206th230th255th169th67th199th273rd315th219th220th259th66th99th
2021-22221st357th--11th282nd4th123rd118th289th283rd210th91st220th269th19th184th342nd350th
2020-21128th357th--1st236th7th190th260th258th13th276th91st224th184th56th340th80th188th
2019-20205th352nd--12th218th23rd62nd129th252nd148th224th225th235th314th68th218th262nd285th
2018-19259th257th--126th285th74th289th239th196th190th291st74th210th298th88th252nd207th248th
2017-18233rd342nd--64th245th41st204th171st35th215th313th35th341st339th65th218th254th291st
2016-17221st281st--68th276th106th188th61st190th252nd273rd317th229th293rd150th80th285th258th
2015-16277th342nd--111th172nd278th223rd117th226th101st161st248th226th219th294th127th116th63rd
2014-15246th225th--102nd297th237th180th38th326th205th285th162nd339th349th267th44th231st168th