Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Michigan 19-12 (0.613) | Big Ten

All-Play Percentage: 0.966 (13^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.769 (6^th)	Record Quality: 0.311 (40^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 16.51 (13^th)
Pace: 69.62 (177^th)	Momentum: -1.73 (266^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.72 (179^th)	Def. Momentum: -2.45 (286^th)
Consistency: -8.82 (136^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.62 (230^th)	Away From Home: -0.99 (247^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -3.69 (336^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

110.65

26.61

72.24

83.93

47.80

32.44

34.47

21.30

40.59

30.19

67.22

10.86

12.12

4.80

38.65

25.37

35.97

2.03

RANK:

18^th

123^rd

137^th

73^rd

12^th

111^th

105^th

215^th

42^nd

99^th

8^th

176^th

209^th

189^th

143^rd

233^rd

125^th

176^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

89.13

19.94

83.29

40.41

24.83

32.18

31.15

35.07

27.31

53.98

7.55

11.27

3.96

29.81

37.40

32.79

1.97

RANK:

16^th

20^th

231^st

47^th

11^th

109^th

351^st

90^th

119^th

43^rd

7^th

59^th

53^rd

7^th

351^st

92^nd

291^st

ANALYSIS:
Despite their unexceptional win percentage, Michigan should be regarded as one of the better teams in college hoops. They have a record of 19-12 and are ranked 13th overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 14) in the Big Ten (average ranking 36.9). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.769 (which ranks sixth nationally), Michigan is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

Michigan is one of the most menacing defensive teams in the country. Ranked 16th in defensive efficiency, they will allow fewer than 90 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Michigan is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 19.94 vs. AO, they are currently rated 20th in the country in that category. Michigan has also done a really good job this year to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. They are ranked 43rd in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 54.0% of their attempts from close-up.

Michigan plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 18th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 111 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Michigan allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 7.55, which ranks #7 in the country. Michigan is also an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They are most proficient from two-point range, making good on 40.6% of their mid-range jumpers (42nd in the nation), 67.2% of their near-proximity chances (eighth), and 47.8% of their total shots from the field (12th) vs. AO.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/5/2019	vs Appalachian St.₁₈₁	W 76.48 - 57.38	W 79-71	1-0	109.34	96.27	▼ 13.07	86.28	89.79	▼ 3.51	▼ 16.58
Tue 11/12/2019	vs Creighton₈	W 75.00 - 72.34	W 79-69	2-0	105.86	119.77	▲ 13.91	107.11	105.62	▲ 1.49	▲ 15.40
Fri 11/15/2019	vs Elon₂₄₈	W 80.49 - 56.85	W 70-50	3-0	116.41	107.55	▼ 8.86	86.89	79.11	▲ 7.78	▼ 1.08
Fri 11/22/2019	vs Houston Baptist₃₃₆	W 99.95 - 64.48	W 111-68	4-0	128.21	147.55	▲ 19.34	87.57	67.67	▲ 19.90	▲ 39.24
Wed 11/27/2019	vs Iowa State₉₁ *	W 77.89 - 67.92	W 83-76	5-0	110.20	105.06	▼ 5.14	96.33	98.70	▼ 2.37	▼ 7.51
Thu 11/28/2019	vs North Carolina₆₃ *	W 75.54 - 68.33	W 73-64	6-0	106.19	102.82	▼ 3.37	96.01	87.32	▲ 8.69	▲ 5.32
Fri 11/29/2019	vs Gonzaga₂ *	L 73.83 - 79.41	W 82-64	7-0	102.19	120.00	▲ 17.81	109.35	88.06	▲ 21.29	▲ 39.10
Tue 12/3/2019	@ Louisville₁₀	L 67.83 - 71.53	L 43-58	7-1	101.55	65.94	▼ 35.61	101.66	86.44	▲ 15.22	▼ 20.39
Fri 12/6/2019	vs Iowa₂₀	W 76.02 - 71.58	W 103-91	8-1	105.17	137.55	▲ 32.38	103.50	121.02	▼ 17.52	▲ 14.86
Wed 12/11/2019	@ Illinois₂₉	L 67.28 - 68.23	L 62-71	8-2	101.07	93.29	▼ 7.78	97.29	98.98	▼ 1.69	▼ 9.47
Sat 12/14/2019	vs Oregon₁₈	W 71.65 - 67.89	L 70-71 (OT)	8-3	105.35	100.83	▼ 4.52	104.79	104.06	▲ 0.73	▼ 3.79
Sat 12/21/2019	vs Presbyterian₃₃₄	W 85.50 - 54.09	W 86-44	9-3	122.15	137.09	▲ 14.94	82.69	61.97	▲ 20.72	▲ 35.66
Sun 12/29/2019	vs UMass Lowell₂₉₀	W 88.91 - 61.52	W 86-60	10-3	120.87	113.64	▼ 7.23	88.12	82.86	▲ 5.26	▼ 1.97
Sun 1/5/2020	@ Michigan State₃	L 67.03 - 74.88	L 69-87	10-4	98.84	95.41	▼ 3.43	104.36	111.64	▼ 7.28	▼ 10.71
Thu 1/9/2020	vs Purdue₁₆	W 66.79 - 63.31	W 84-78 (2OT)	11-4	98.43	99.19	▲ 0.76	97.90	102.45	▼ 4.55	▼ 3.79
Sun 1/12/2020	@ Minnesota₂₁	L 68.16 - 70.54	L 67-75	11-5	102.21	104.01	▲ 1.80	100.87	114.74	▼ 13.87	▼ 12.07
Fri 1/17/2020	@ Iowa₂₀	L 72.55 - 75.11	L 83-90	11-6	105.17	113.41	▲ 8.24	103.50	119.17	▼ 15.67	▼ 7.43
Wed 1/22/2020	vs Penn State₂₅	W 73.98 - 68.84	L 63-72	11-7	101.28	83.17	▼ 18.11	98.66	101.06	▼ 2.40	▼ 20.51
Sat 1/25/2020	vs Illinois₂₉	W 70.63 - 64.88	L 62-64	11-8	101.07	91.49	▼ 9.58	97.29	96.57	▲ 0.72	▼ 8.86
Tue 1/28/2020	@ Nebraska₁₆₇	W 79.59 - 67.66	W 79-68	12-8	109.99	106.40	▼ 3.59	89.29	89.44	▼ 0.15	▼ 3.74
Sat 2/1/2020	vs Rutgers₂₄ *	W 67.16 - 65.90	W 69-63	13-8	98.01	100.16	▲ 2.15	95.60	91.45	▲ 4.15	▲ 6.30
Tue 2/4/2020	vs Ohio State₇	W 68.78 - 67.08	L 58-61	13-9	99.33	88.18	▼ 11.15	101.20	96.29	▲ 4.91	▼ 6.24
Sat 2/8/2020	vs Michigan State₃	L 70.44 - 71.35	W 77-68	14-9	98.84	107.55	▲ 8.71	104.36	100.64	▲ 3.72	▲ 12.43
Wed 2/12/2020	@ Northwestern₁₂₀	W 72.16 - 63.97	W 79-54	15-9	108.68	111.54	▲ 2.86	91.77	77.55	▲ 14.22	▲ 17.08
Sun 2/16/2020	vs Indiana₃₄	W 72.10 - 65.05	W 89-65	16-9	102.67	143.01	▲ 40.34	97.26	104.23	▼ 6.97	▲ 33.37
Wed 2/19/2020	@ Rutgers₂₄	L 65.48 - 67.49	W 60-52	17-9	98.01	97.69	▼ 0.32	95.60	81.42	▲ 14.18	▲ 13.86
Sat 2/22/2020	@ Purdue₁₆	L 63.54 - 66.50	W 71-63	18-9	98.43	100.98	▲ 2.55	97.90	82.08	▲ 15.82	▲ 18.37
Thu 2/27/2020	vs Wisconsin₂₆	W 68.24 - 63.14	L 74-81	18-10	101.46	108.00	▲ 6.54	98.24	121.57	▼ 23.33	▼ 16.79
Sun 3/1/2020	@ Ohio State₇	L 65.46 - 70.50	L 63-77	18-11	99.33	93.36	▼ 5.97	101.20	111.19	▼ 9.99	▼ 15.96
Thu 3/5/2020	vs Nebraska₁₆₇	W 83.23 - 64.28	W 82-58	19-11	109.99	100.04	▼ 9.95	89.29	76.47	▲ 12.82	▲ 2.87
Sun 3/8/2020	@ Maryland₁₁	L 67.19 - 70.60	L 70-83	19-12	100.84	110.38	▲ 9.54	101.19	124.54	▼ 23.35	▼ 13.81
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that prefer the outside shot, Michigan often performs worse than normal. Michigan is more efficient than usual 23% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.96. In their other contests, Michigan performs better than the norm 89% of the time.
	Michigan does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.27%, Michigan performs above average 58% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 17% of the time.
	Michigan performs better against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.47, Michigan is more efficient than normal 67% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 26% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Our 10 favorite photos from Michigan’s Senior Night win over Nebraska (3/6/2020 7:33:00 AM) Michigan players were all smiles en route to defeating Nebraska on Senior Night at Crisler Center, 82-58. In what would be Zavier Simpson and Jon Teske’s last game in Ann Arbor, the winningest duo notched win No. 108 to add to their Michigan school record career wins. Teske finished with 12 points, 5 rebounds, 1 assist, and 2 blocks.
	No. 25 Michigan sends Zavier Simpson out in style on Senior Night, beats Nebraska 82-58 (3/6/2020 12:33:00 AM) Zavier Simpson and Jon Teske had an emotional send off on Senior Night, as Michigan crushes Nebraska. Simpson had 11 points and 10 assists and the Wolverines had five players in double figures as Michigan rounds into shape for the conference tournament.
	No. 25 Michigan beats Nebraska 82-58 with Beilein on hand (3/5/2020 11:51:00 PM) “Definitely appreciate the support from him." Simpson had 11 points and 10 assists, and Teske scored 12 points as No. 25 Michigan beat Nebraska 82-58 on Thursday night. Beilein watched from a box about halfway up the seating bowl as his old team closed out its home schedule with a relatively easy win. Michigan (19-11, 10-9 Big Ten) led 32-28 ...
	Michigan tops Nebraska 82-58 on Senior Night; John Beilein back to watch (3/5/2020 9:20:00 PM) “Definitely appreciate the support from him.” Simpson had 11 points and 10 assists, and Teske scored 12 points as No. 25 Michigan beat Nebraska 82-58 on Thursday night. Beilein watched from a box about halfway up the seating bowl as his old team closed out its home schedule with a relatively easy win. Michigan (19-11, 10-9 Big Ten) led 32 ...
	Wessons spark Buckeyes' rout of Wolverines (3/2/2020 1:09:00 AM) No. 23 Ohio State has won eight of its last 10 games, a surge that culminated in a 77-63 victory over No. 19 Michigan in front of sold-out crowd Sunday. The Buckeyes (20-9, 10-8 Big Ten ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	26	0.934	27-10 (0.730)	0.730	0.499	Big Ten	68.94	-9.88	0.803	-2.58	0.21	30.75
2023-24	133	0.634	8-24 (0.250)	0.250	-0.058	Big Ten	67.59	-9.45	0.766	-0.95	-0.76	86.14
2022-23	53	0.856	18-16 (0.529)	0.529	0.182	Big Ten	67.43	-10.00	0.703	3.37	-0.61	59.64
2021-22	21	0.944	19-15 (0.559)	0.559	0.286	Big Ten	67.18	-9.47	0.761	-1.11	-0.22	28.49
2020-21	3	0.994	23-5 (0.821)	0.821	0.577	Big Ten	67.45	-11.28	0.785	3.46	-1.71	6.58
2019-20	13	0.966	19-12 (0.613)	0.613	0.311	Big Ten	69.62	-8.82	0.769	-3.69	-0.99	16.51
2018-19	7	0.983	30-7 (0.811)	0.811	0.525	Big Ten	65.58	-10.18	0.739	1.71	0.85	6.42
2017-18	7	0.983	33-8 (0.805)	0.805	0.518	Big Ten	67.11	-9.49	0.728	-1.73	0.45	24.15
2016-17	15	0.960	26-12 (0.684)	0.684	0.392	Big Ten	65.54	-11.00	0.745	-2.03	-0.26	24.14
2015-16	55	0.846	23-13 (0.639)	0.639	0.259	Big Ten	67.01	-8.76	0.675	-5.28	0.09	35.76
2014-15	37	0.894	16-16 (0.500)	0.500	0.135	Big Ten	61.18	-10.32	0.716	-3.25	0.62	63.46

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	117.96	32.02	72.55	86.28	48.10	33.87	34.61	15.10	44.26	37.32	61.89	11.37	18.16	8.02	39.25	17.50	43.25	1.96
2023-24	108.38	26.85	69.46	85.22	45.87	30.64	37.66	24.94	40.63	29.65	58.78	9.56	14.29	6.15	35.95	29.26	34.79	2.01
2022-23	109.90	27.34	70.09	84.88	46.81	30.84	36.56	27.14	42.00	26.91	63.40	8.84	15.09	7.15	36.33	31.97	31.70	2.05
2021-22	113.23	26.82	76.52	85.73	48.62	26.38	35.40	28.44	42.22	30.90	65.80	8.99	15.31	6.66	30.77	33.18	36.05	1.95
2020-21	116.46	25.93	78.13	83.92	50.57	28.14	40.24	23.74	41.34	32.04	66.49	8.75	14.73	7.18	33.53	28.29	38.18	1.95
2019-20	110.65	26.61	72.24	83.93	47.80	32.44	34.47	21.30	40.59	30.19	67.22	10.86	12.12	4.80	38.65	25.37	35.97	2.03
2018-19	115.26	25.14	72.04	89.03	47.34	36.02	35.67	18.42	33.03	34.59	67.11	12.14	12.13	5.47	40.45	20.69	38.86	2.02
2017-18	112.13	28.90	66.89	83.32	48.04	35.91	35.48	17.92	37.84	29.49	69.54	12.66	11.63	6.22	43.10	21.51	35.39	2.08
2016-17	121.26	26.49	77.47	84.11	51.05	37.19	39.99	20.99	44.87	25.93	71.91	11.98	11.22	6.40	44.21	24.96	30.83	2.13
2015-16	110.94	26.42	74.16	84.29	46.30	36.48	36.45	19.04	36.53	28.77	65.24	12.78	10.90	5.45	43.28	22.59	34.13	2.09
2014-15	110.61	24.27	76.86	86.46	46.01	33.41	37.10	25.67	42.08	27.38	60.55	11.67	11.16	5.81	38.64	29.69	31.67	2.07

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	94.04	22.24	--	91.00	36.89	36.47	29.13	27.54	31.24	26.99	53.14	12.58	14.51	4.42	40.07	30.27	29.66	2.10
2023-24	106.08	23.73	--	87.71	44.62	29.67	34.30	23.40	33.26	34.64	61.14	13.03	15.22	6.28	33.83	26.67	39.50	1.94
2022-23	95.65	20.32	--	88.29	40.84	29.35	31.21	27.02	33.77	31.92	55.68	10.23	12.90	3.53	33.24	30.60	36.16	1.97
2021-22	94.92	19.20	--	86.82	41.38	29.12	30.25	31.13	38.07	26.57	57.46	7.86	9.11	3.05	33.54	35.85	30.61	2.03
2020-21	87.23	18.06	--	87.30	37.33	26.91	30.46	33.14	31.15	27.26	51.64	8.83	10.69	3.03	30.82	37.96	31.22	2.00
2019-20	89.13	19.94	--	83.29	40.41	24.83	32.18	31.15	35.07	27.31	53.98	7.55	11.27	3.96	29.81	37.40	32.79	1.97
2018-19	85.11	19.67	--	84.87	38.00	27.06	27.66	25.19	27.61	32.62	54.60	8.60	13.66	4.84	31.88	29.68	38.44	1.93
2017-18	88.58	22.62	--	80.12	39.96	25.22	31.07	31.04	35.02	23.85	55.81	7.72	12.52	5.85	31.48	38.75	29.77	2.02
2016-17	95.16	20.78	--	82.55	44.06	24.41	34.65	30.16	37.64	27.98	59.18	7.45	13.89	6.72	29.57	36.53	33.89	1.96
2015-16	98.43	21.85	--	82.65	43.99	28.75	34.04	26.97	37.47	26.92	61.15	8.74	10.79	5.16	34.79	32.63	32.58	2.02
2014-15	95.48	22.03	--	84.80	42.14	28.70	30.78	25.67	35.59	30.43	58.38	7.98	16.16	8.21	33.85	30.27	35.88	1.98

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	26^th	26	24^th	24	37^th	37	9^th	9	Big Ten	Big Ten	52^nd	52	233^rd	233	4^th	4	310^th	310	123^rd	123	28^th	28
2023-24	133^rd	133	132^nd	132	337^th	337	210^th	210	Big Ten	Big Ten	192^nd	192	208^th	208	3^rd	3	178^th	178	253^rd	253	82^nd	82
2022-23	53^rd	53	53^rd	53	176^th	176	88^th	88	Big Ten	Big Ten	200^th	200	276^th	276	27^th	27	2^nd	2	184^th	184	59^th	59
2021-22	21^st	21	21^st	21	153^rd	153	54^th	54	Big Ten	Big Ten	223^rd	223	213^th	213	3^rd	3	203^rd	203	210^th	210	26^th	26
2020-21	3^rd	3	3^rd	3	12^th	12	3^rd	3	Big Ten	Big Ten	293^rd	293	330^th	330	30^th	30	3^rd	3	310^th	310	3^rd	3
2019-20	13^th	13	13^th	13	102^nd	102	40^th	40	Big Ten	Big Ten	177^th	177	136^th	136	6^th	6	336^th	336	247^th	247	13^th	13
2018-19	7^th	7	7^th	7	15^th	15	10^th	10	Big Ten	Big Ten	332^nd	332	255^th	255	25^th	25	17^th	17	69^th	69	5^th	5
2017-18	7^th	7	7^th	7	12^th	12	6^th	6	Big Ten	Big Ten	323^rd	323	230^th	230	28^th	28	252^nd	252	90^th	90	19^th	19
2016-17	15^th	15	15^th	15	59^th	59	26^th	26	Big Ten	Big Ten	341^st	341	340^th	340	25^th	25	275^th	275	177^th	177	22^nd	22
2015-16	55^th	55	55^th	55	87^th	87	55^th	55	Big Ten	Big Ten	315^th	315	149^th	149	54^th	54	348^th	348	164^th	164	36^th	36
2014-15	37^th	37	37^th	37	179^th	179	101^st	101	Big Ten	Big Ten	342^nd	342	295^th	295	23^rd	23	324^th	324	97^th	97	59^th	59

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	47^th	47	36^th	36	171^st	171	222^nd	222	29^th	29	177^th	177	144^th	144	331^st	331	13^th	13	23^rd	23	79^th	79	227^th	227	35^th	35	29^th	29	164^th	164	328^th	328	14^th	14	72^nd	72
2023-24	116^th	116	165^th	165	281^st	281	195^th	195	90^th	90	219^th	219	32^nd	32	121^st	121	115^th	115	231^st	231	137^th	137	282^nd	282	136^th	136	113^th	113	219^th	219	115^th	115	229^th	229	189^th	189
2022-23	58^th	58	88^th	88	244^th	244	168^th	168	43^rd	43	196^th	196	48^th	48	79^th	79	36^th	36	283^rd	283	61^st	61	291^st	291	118^th	118	24^th	24	206^th	206	83^rd	83	294^th	294	241^st	241
2021-22	15^th	15	91^st	91	30^th	30	104^th	104	11^th	11	303^rd	303	75^th	75	65^th	65	24^th	24	93^rd	93	20^th	20	278^th	278	71^st	71	34^th	34	315^th	315	73^rd	73	115^th	115	52^nd	52
2020-21	7^th	7	127^th	127	19^th	19	84^th	84	4^th	4	267^th	267	2^nd	2	155^th	155	66^th	66	41^st	41	11^th	11	298^th	298	78^th	78	26^th	26	286^th	286	178^th	178	54^th	54	47^th	47
2019-20	18^th	18	123^rd	123	137^th	137	73^rd	73	12^th	12	111^th	111	105^th	105	215^th	215	42^nd	42	99^th	99	8^th	8	176^th	176	209^th	209	189^th	189	143^rd	143	233^rd	233	125^th	125	176^th	176
2018-19	18^th	18	217^th	217	149^th	149	15^th	15	29^th	29	64^th	64	111^th	111	255^th	255	286^th	286	40^th	40	15^th	15	127^th	127	259^th	259	237^th	237	124^th	124	286^th	286	88^th	88	159^th	159
2017-18	34^th	34	63^rd	63	315^th	315	103^rd	103	35^th	35	33^rd	33	155^th	155	305^th	305	132^nd	132	128^th	128	7^th	7	66^th	66	300^th	300	212^th	212	51^st	51	312^th	312	150^th	150	268^th	268
2016-17	3^rd	3	207^th	207	12^th	12	58^th	58	3^rd	3	12^th	12	16^th	16	261^st	261	2^nd	2	277^th	277	1^st	1	93^rd	93	315^th	315	184^th	184	17^th	17	284^th	284	296^th	296	334^th	334
2015-16	37^th	37	250^th	250	41^st	41	76^th	76	54^th	54	14^th	14	84^th	84	318^th	318	118^th	118	169^th	169	33^rd	33	63^rd	63	326^th	326	292^nd	292	23^rd	23	327^th	327	219^th	219	320^th	320
2014-15	27^th	27	324^th	324	9^th	9	18^th	18	55^th	55	31^st	31	56^th	56	164^th	164	5^th	5	231^st	231	112^th	112	142^nd	142	335^th	335	259^th	259	55^th	55	214^th	214	285^th	285	307^th	307

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	12^th	12	27^th	27	--	--	331^st	331	4^th	4	300^th	300	11^th	11	353^rd	353	15^th	15	24^th	24	28^th	28	215^th	215	174^th	174	30^th	30	254^th	254	347^th	347	11^th	11	34^th	34
2023-24	186^th	186	78^th	78	--	--	291^st	291	204^th	204	93^rd	93	176^th	176	211^th	211	9^th	9	326^th	326	294^th	294	287^th	287	305^th	305	283^rd	283	66^th	66	182^nd	182	303^rd	303	319^th	319
2022-23	47^th	47	18^th	18	--	--	327^th	327	48^th	48	114^th	114	48^th	48	304^th	304	25^th	25	286^th	286	72^nd	72	139^th	139	90^th	90	15^th	15	69^th	69	275^th	275	242^nd	242	283^rd	283
2021-22	65^th	65	15^th	15	--	--	279^th	279	86^th	86	107^th	107	42^nd	42	346^th	346	199^th	199	79^th	79	121^st	121	13^th	13	6^th	6	10^th	10	78^th	78	344^th	344	47^th	47	162^nd	162
2020-21	4^th	4	6^th	6	--	--	342^nd	342	2^nd	2	40^th	40	23^rd	23	355^th	355	6^th	6	144^th	144	12^th	12	41^st	41	49^th	49	11^th	11	14^th	14	353^rd	353	74^th	74	261^st	261
2019-20	16^th	16	20^th	20	--	--	231^st	231	47^th	47	11^th	11	109^th	109	351^st	351	90^th	90	119^th	119	43^rd	43	7^th	7	59^th	59	53^rd	53	7^th	7	351^st	351	92^nd	92	291^st	291
2018-19	2^nd	2	5^th	5	--	--	230^th	230	7^th	7	12^th	12	1^st	1	324^th	324	1^st	1	269^th	269	39^th	39	9^th	9	174^th	174	47^th	47	9^th	9	327^th	327	256^th	256	329^th	329
2017-18	3^rd	3	52^nd	52	--	--	98^th	98	17^th	17	11^th	11	14^th	14	346^th	346	79^th	79	31^st	31	52^nd	52	5^th	5	39^th	39	76^th	76	16^th	16	350^th	350	41^st	41	182^nd	182
2016-17	54^th	54	10^th	10	--	--	216^th	216	158^th	158	15^th	15	129^th	129	342^nd	342	211^th	211	154^th	154	145^th	145	5^th	5	136^th	136	166^th	166	11^th	11	343^rd	343	137^th	137	288^th	288
2015-16	95^th	95	14^th	14	--	--	198^th	198	171^st	171	175^th	175	123^rd	123	283^rd	283	239^th	239	97^th	97	234^th	234	31^st	31	6^th	6	34^th	34	163^rd	163	288^th	288	90^th	90	125^th	125
2014-15	72^nd	72	10^th	10	--	--	288^th	288	113^th	113	210^th	210	21^st	21	189^th	189	178^th	178	259^th	259	159^th	159	8^th	8	246^th	246	294^th	294	164^th	164	147^th	147	218^th	218	206^th	206