TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Auburn  32-6 (0.842)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.992 (4th)
Schedule Strength: 0.804 (3rd)
Record Quality: 0.625 (3rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 2.45 (2nd)
Pace: 66.76 (178th)
Momentum: -3.24 (313th)
Off. Momentum: -4.92 (360th)
Def. Momentum: 1.69 (77th)
Consistency: -8.87 (93rd)
Res. Consistency: -11.49 (100th)
Away From Home: -0.53 (208th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.51 (240th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 127.99 32.60 72.28 91.30 49.81 35.80 37.61 21.65 45.26 33.86 65.63 14.92 16.37 7.59 39.21 23.71 37.08 2.02
RANK: 3rd 23rd 184th 27th 11th 116th 30th 183rd 9th 107th 17th 48th 95th 45th 169th 212th 156th 181st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.97 28.41 -- 84.52 37.27 29.59 28.12 24.18 31.82 30.75 50.35 9.82 13.06 4.59 35.00 28.61 36.38 1.99
RANK: 7th 231st -- 60th 6th 33rd 4th 297th 20th 129th 7th 36th 65th 41st 51st 320th 166th 262nd

ANALYSIS:
Auburn is one of the most elite and successful teams in college basketball this year. They are ranked #4 (out of 364) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 32-6. Of the 16 schools in the SEC (average ranking 32.0), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference. Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.804 (the third-highest in the country), Auburn has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.

Auburn is undoubtedly one of the best in the business on offense. The team is rated third in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 127 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Auburn is an outstanding shooting team, capable of converting from a variety of locations on the floor and ranking in the top-50 in each of our four most noteworthy field goal categories. Though they're most successful shooting the mid-range jumper (45.3% vs. AO, ninth in the country), the team also makes 37.6% of their three-pointers (30th), 65.6% of their near-proximity chances (17th), and 49.8% of their total shots from the field (11th) vs. AO. Auburn also does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.60 vs. AO, they are ranked 23rd in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 72.3%.

Compounding opponents' problems, Auburn is nearly as dominant on the defensive end of the floor as they are on the offensive side of things. The team ranks seventh nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 92 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Auburn will wreak havoc with many opponents' shooting percentages this year. And it doesn't really matter where the shots originate; the team ranks in the top-25 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. Defending the long-ball is their strength (allowing 28.1% shooting from three vs. AO, fourth-best in the nation), but the team also harasses AO into converting just 50.3% of their near-proximity attempts (seventh), 31.8% of their mid-range chances (20th), and 37.3% of their total shots from the field (sixth). Auburn is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.6% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 41st in the NCAA).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Auburn is typically better vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 52.98%, Auburn performs above their norm 64% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 8% of the time.
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, Auburn often performs better than normal. Auburn is more efficient than usual 68% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.32. In their other contests, Auburn performs better than the norm 21% of the time.
Auburn does worse vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 32.03, Auburn performs above average 19% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 64% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-254th4th7th3rdSEC178th93rd3rd240th208th2nd
2023-244th4th16th8thSEC61st275th35th176th252nd6th
2022-2324th24th103rd50thSEC175th330th30th185th192nd20th
2021-2215th15th7th5thSEC50th9th32nd34th343rd10th
2020-2164th64th197th104thSEC72nd81st50th208th155th71st
2019-2037th37th10th7thSEC142nd69th53rd251st249th19th
2018-1912th12th31st13thSEC184th111th7th304th333rd10th
2017-1827th26th24th11thSEC20th123rd47th177th329th20th
2016-1774th74th134th72ndSEC9th228th49th243rd131st83rd
2015-16225th225th273rd165thSEC38th231st29th229th298th169th
2014-15135th135th234th131stSEC36th195th29th128th133rd145th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-253rd23rd184th27th11th116th30th183rd9th107th17th48th95th45th169th212th156th181st
2023-2410th17th68th119th13th186th31st273rd25th33rd72nd25th62nd54th213th282nd46th77th
2022-2338th17th265th89th56th200th125th182nd188th80th52nd34th67th14th235th198th104th110th
2021-2234th28th144th9th142nd96th266th205th234th41st80th13th52nd78th163rd257th103rd151st
2020-2138th18th104th159th78th40th159th318th120th142nd55th210th71st78th44th323rd145th265th
2019-2040th1st316th83rd130th37th280th315th64th86th97th99th14th27th48th326th114th251st
2018-198th121st160th38th27th6th13th345th175th126th47th3rd147th158th6th347th174th330th
2017-1847th15th19th112th148th48th121st287th343rd145th63rd14th29th27th68th297th158th256th
2016-1752nd18th277th228th57th149th30th298th327th72nd67th25th43rd20th134th295th67th153rd
2015-16244th88th339th282nd259th56th232nd322nd231st209th267th258th173rd239th37th315th170th285th
2014-15132nd2nd273rd324th148th202nd106th317th153rd107th251st138th121st142nd134th305th55th124th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-257th231st--60th6th33rd4th297th20th129th7th36th65th41st51st320th166th262nd
2023-245th322nd--28th4th10th13th209th24th251st2nd51st189th147th28th253rd304th332nd
2022-2325th303rd--66th28th88th5th148th28th218th57th179th242nd118th115th172nd272nd261st
2021-229th195th--87th4th88th57th151st11th221st2nd242nd111th159th119th172nd255th265th
2020-2197th125th--246th83rd220th94th103rd144th282nd44th336th102nd55th198th80th262nd222nd
2019-2061st218th--144th27th141st166th192nd13th178th24th103rd52nd71st152nd198th184th199th
2018-1928th111th--11th72nd263rd124th23rd115th52nd79th10th296th243rd332nd56th105th39th
2017-1833rd143rd--18th75th184th144th76th62nd84th60th96th101st107th275th130th138th105th
2016-17129th208th--92nd115th274th238th75th122nd121st69th173rd231st72nd301st86th141st80th
2015-16202nd232nd--229th142nd219th211th272nd169th117th157th229th123rd45th184th264th97th124th
2014-15156th216th--36th212th178th144th73rd248th115th231st95th65th319th251st113th169th139th