Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UMass12-20 (0.375) | Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.391 (222nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.500 (137th)
Record Quality: -0.113 (237th)
Avg. Season Rank: 191.49 (188th)
Pace: 68.62 (58th)
Momentum: -4.84 (342nd)
Off. Momentum: -1.27 (272nd)
Def. Momentum: -3.57 (333rd)
Consistency: -8.91 (96th)
Res. Consistency: -12.18 (158th)
Away From Home: 1.06 (35th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.57 (135th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
103.45
68.42
30.24
67.49
91.84
37.02
40.30
30.85
9.00
29.19
25.26
8.83
34.94
35.73
19.19
53.69
13.81
18.35
6.17
33.59
27.51
38.91
1.95
RANK:
245th
62nd
70th
326th
20th
235th
334th
269th
331st
358th
80th
124th
269th
53rd
157th
326th
88th
33rd
159th
319th
113th
111th
52nd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
108.56
68.82
28.66
--
88.13
38.22
43.36
33.64
11.58
34.44
18.71
6.35
33.97
35.79
20.28
56.66
11.93
16.65
6.12
38.17
21.23
40.61
1.98
RANK:
181st
311th
242nd
--
228th
162nd
136th
177th
193rd
197th
59th
23rd
55th
333rd
266th
100th
157th
319th
195th
162nd
45th
324th
287th
ANALYSIS: If you see UMass on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. Their record this season is 12-20, and the club is ranked 222nd overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 15 schools in the A-10 (average ranking 141.1), they're currently ranked as our #12 team in the conference.
Based on their performances this year, UMass will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #181 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UMass has been fairly decent in preventing teams from draining shots from between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 55th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 34.0% of their attempts from that distance. Due to this fact, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots as they typically would and, as a result, only 21.2% of AO's field goal attempts will come from those in-between locations. If UMass does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's difficulties stopping opponents from obtaining second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 16.65 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 46th-worst in college hoops.
UMass doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 245th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UMass struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They only convert 29.2% of their three-pointers (seventh from the bottom in the nation), 53.7% of their near-proximity attempts (326th), and 40.3% of their total shots from the field (334th) vs. AO. UMass is also not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 67.5% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #326 overall in free throw percentage. If UMass does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 91.84 vs. AO, which ranks #20 in college basketball.
UMass has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 342nd in positive momentum because of it. On the road, UMass performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 35th in our away-from-home metric.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UMass is typically better vs. teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.22, UMass performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, UMass often performs worse than normal. UMass is more efficient than usual 22% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.50%. In their other contests, UMass performs better than the norm 64% of the time.
UMass does better vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 12.49, UMass performs above average 75% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 37% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.