TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Holy Cross  10-22 (0.313)  |  Patriot League
All-Play Percentage: 0.055 (343rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.288 (328th)
Record Quality: -0.395 (347th)
Avg. Season Rank: 339.48 (347th)
Pace: 69.60 (73rd)
Momentum: -2.35 (284th)
Off. Momentum: 0.76 (174th)
Def. Momentum: -3.11 (324th)
Consistency: -8.14 (44th)
Res. Consistency: -11.13 (115th)
Away From Home: 0.45 (61st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.08 (204th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.38 20.72 62.84 84.55 41.60 28.66 34.96 25.85 34.23 30.05 54.26 9.02 10.94 3.79 33.89 30.57 35.54 1.98
RANK: 333rd 347th 357th 184th 294th 272nd 124th 121st 325th 150th 312th 283rd 320th 325th 274th 125th 157th 108th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.70 25.08 -- 88.58 46.43 29.45 32.60 22.66 41.33 36.47 60.76 11.49 16.61 6.26 33.25 25.58 41.17 1.92
RANK: 295th 175th -- 335th 315th 119th 103rd 144th 317th 362nd 249th 236th 334th 298th 70th 73rd 352nd 348th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Holy Cross likely fits the bill. They are ranked #343 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 10-22. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 10) in the Patriot League (average ranking 265.3).

Holy Cross is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #333 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 93 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Holy Cross has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 62.8% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #357 overall in free throw percentage. Holy Cross also does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.72 vs. AO, they are 347th in the overall rankings for that category.

Holy Cross doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #295 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Holy Cross struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 335th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.58 vs. AO. Holy Cross also can be weak on rebounding, giving the opposition too many chances to score off of the offensive glass. The club has a rating of 16.61 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (334th nationally).

Holy Cross is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 44th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Holy Cross does worse vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.21, Holy Cross performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 74% of the time.
Holy Cross performs better against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.41, Holy Cross is more efficient than normal 74% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 18% of the time.
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Holy Cross usually performs better than average. Holy Cross is more efficient than normal 90% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 106.25. In all other contests, Holy Cross performs better than average 35% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25320th320th273rd316thPatriot League243rd40th325th65th46th319th
2023-24341st341st318th337thPatriot League262nd22nd335th253rd118th348th
2022-23343rd343rd319th347thPatriot League73rd44th328th204th61st347th
2021-22349th349th317th347thPatriot League140th56th344th192nd160th350th
2020-21227th227th294th302ndPatriot League145th200th195th50th40th295th
2019-20346th346th352nd345thPatriot League139th316th251st118th1st344th
2018-19226th225th195th209thPatriot League329th149th238th110th122nd171st
2017-18278th278th268th280thPatriot League344th179th306th191st31st298th
2016-17214th214th207th212thPatriot League349th282nd233rd174th231st203rd
2015-16275th275th232nd263rdPatriot League339th290th291st215th93rd262nd
2014-15232nd232nd210th249thPatriot League199th161st267th39th235th232nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25264th358th215th247th216th69th40th67th119th363rd205th360th361st353rd53rd55th362nd362nd
2023-24292nd330th335th206th227th201st163rd144th191st221st251st358th278th338th198th142nd213th190th
2022-23333rd347th357th184th294th272nd124th121st325th150th312th283rd320th325th274th125th157th108th
2021-22349th231st162nd220th351st308th290th98th356th104th345th330th135th286th307th96th95th49th
2020-21194th325th194th201st138th210th16th247th170th59th298th311th214th261st211th251st59th89th
2019-20324th333rd263rd313th247th157th241st299th175th145th286th353rd306th292nd106th285th100th181st
2018-19226th347th298th137th125th144th163rd263rd312th70th84th267th330th288th155th268th81st134th
2017-18306th315th275th346th150th166th296th293rd257th216th51st333rd351st351st104th269th134th203rd
2016-17275th252nd235th306th267th21st224th341st308th202nd249th126th347th337th12th339th161st309th
2015-16299th235th208th273rd306th32nd267th330th269th238th313th287th329th328th19th330th206th318th
2014-15244th232nd113th189th249th151st182nd261st134th101st318th216th164th191st148th267th86th145th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25323rd81st--353rd336th91st259th267th335th354th281st266th120th131st29th217th325th334th
2023-24360th264th--332nd322nd292nd359th84th221st328th230th195th33rd114th239th38th288th223rd
2022-23295th175th--335th315th119th103rd144th317th362nd249th236th334th298th70th73rd352nd348th
2021-22323rd290th--226th340th17th338th93rd223rd356th224th295th194th264th16th79th357th357th
2020-21253rd348th--80th265th8th233rd67th335th350th40th351st267th237th13th78th355th353rd
2019-20346th247th--312th347th45th345th168th318th350th268th351st269th269th20th119th349th347th
2018-19218th65th--198th216th270th306th133rd195th142nd187th122nd323rd316th268th118th132nd114th
2017-18262nd284th--243rd142nd335th212th87th187th123rd126th341st290th274th325th71st109th52nd
2016-17139th82nd--60th210th323rd151st14th117th108th298th16th284th297th339th14th140th40th
2015-16244th134th--184th262nd279th114th35th167th256th305th118th300th320th280th23rd251st157th
2014-15220th203rd--34th316th25th335th79th337th287th147th83rd85th280th43rd124th323rd322nd