TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Boston U  16-17 (0.485)  |  Patriot League
All-Play Percentage: 0.208 (287th)
Schedule Strength: 0.235 (357th)
Record Quality: -0.211 (296th)
Avg. Season Rank: 287.23 (296th)
Pace: 66.32 (278th)
Momentum: 1.50 (106th)
Off. Momentum: 3.54 (30th)
Def. Momentum: -2.05 (278th)
Consistency: -10.24 (292nd)
Res. Consistency: -14.24 (304th)
Away From Home: 0.56 (110th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.78 (151st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.69 24.42 74.09 84.85 40.82 34.02 33.31 17.56 31.81 33.26 53.26 10.18 10.99 3.19 40.10 20.70 39.20 2.01
RANK: 290th 258th 105th 213th 321st 99th 237th 331st 359th 83rd 308th 250th 292nd 352nd 88th 330th 78th 184th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.19 29.86 -- 83.94 45.06 32.49 37.04 21.27 42.07 30.18 55.81 10.86 12.07 4.45 38.70 25.34 35.96 2.03
RANK: 236th 303rd -- 92nd 226th 234th 324th 116th 308th 147th 95th 133rd 72nd 54th 259th 128th 173rd 135th

ANALYSIS:
Boston U is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. Carrying a record of 16-17, they are currently rated #287 overall (out of 362) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 10 schools in the Patriot League (average ranking 288.8), they're currently ranked as our #4 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.235 (which ranks sixth from the bottom nationally), Boston U has had one of the cushiest slates in all of college basketball.

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to Boston U. The team is ranked 290th in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 99 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Boston U is downright rotten when shooting the mid-range jumper. The team is ranked fourth from the bottom in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 31.8% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. Exacerbating the situation, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting only 40.8% of all their attempts from the floor vs. AO. Boston U also does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 3.2% of all second-chance opportunities (352nd nationally).

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Boston U still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 108 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #236 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Boston U does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 324th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.0% of their attempts from afar.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Boston U performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.16, Boston U is more efficient than normal 13% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 63% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, Boston U usually performs better than average. Boston U is more efficient than normal 50% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.74%. In all other contests, Boston U performs better than average 10% of the time.
Boston U is typically better vs. teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.41, Boston U performs above their norm 58% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25311th311th196th286thPatriot League347th253rd360th63rd330th297th
2023-24287th287th208th296thPatriot League278th292nd357th151st110th296th
2022-23261st261st220th270thPatriot League299th76th322nd122nd70th246th
2021-22236th236th104th191stPatriot League265th134th332nd112th50th190th
2020-21234th234th258th238thPatriot League302nd147th152nd177th4th203rd
2019-20175th175th101st183rdPatriot League291st274th296th230th20th195th
2018-19219th219th221st237thPatriot League226th182nd260th64th45th224th
2017-18257th257th201st249thPatriot League233rd246th298th192nd23rd251st
2016-17192nd192nd134th170thPatriot League105th278th243rd134th65th179th
2015-16247th247th146th199thPatriot League85th95th295th201st97th232nd
2014-15244th243rd227th261stPatriot League169th209th251st38th25th241st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25319th268th322nd266th313th89th260th215th35th323rd354th325th326th340th73rd202nd306th324th
2023-24290th258th105th213th321st99th237th331st359th83rd308th250th292nd352nd88th330th78th184th
2022-23290th232nd121st156th338th91st249th253rd240th181st358th242nd128th278th95th260th201st250th
2021-22156th224th116th163rd159th135th153rd95th1st311th324th328th144th283rd142nd100th315th286th
2020-21207th305th61st212th199th79th160th214th232nd274th130th351st223rd232nd73rd210th267th294th
2019-20177th304th334th67th102nd182nd232nd298th242nd7th150th317th147th47th214th313th13th43rd
2018-19160th312th278th150th54th259th154th127th20th114th102nd200th268th236th257th136th121st92nd
2017-18262nd288th338th282nd156th236th119th228th270th109th184th194th223rd177th206th211th83rd110th
2016-17226th206th218th260th238th63rd211th314th266th194th221st19th222nd219th44th312th173rd273rd
2015-16218th228th149th322nd167th88th88th312th189th246th206th283rd298th242nd57th294th174th272nd
2014-15153rd30th244th339th142nd35th115th339th38th302nd202nd242nd273rd182nd15th328th248th334th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25268th253rd--80th306th77th321st222nd351st155th195th165th63rd199th106th241st199th232nd
2023-24236th303rd--92nd226th234th324th116th308th147th95th133rd72nd54th259th128th173rd135th
2022-23194th316th--122nd170th193rd147th216th305th91st158th203rd145th170th217th240th100th116th
2021-22312th219th--255th320th74th242nd325th355th183rd199th348th79th277th59th319th144th249th
2020-21225th258th--207th246th101st140th170th280th297th178th297th67th73rd76th169th293rd302nd
2019-20160th69th--284th200th61st192nd94th106th351st88th292nd173rd274th33rd62nd351st346th
2018-19270th207th--110th315th154th154th103rd339th202nd309th251st46th199th178th115th231st206th
2017-18253rd125th--255th234th217th180th181st329th220th172nd310th261st244th168th154th195th186th
2016-17133rd228th--119th127th223rd246th297th226th23rd115th277th250th187th245th312th31st43rd
2015-16242nd148th--275th250th199th109th169th301st276th231st289th208th246th154th134th249th241st
2014-15322nd128th--284th257th333rd310th198th300th79th263rd225th292nd238th323rd158th42nd29th